食用超加工食品与全因和特定原因死亡风险:新加坡华人健康研究

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Yue Li, Xianli Li, An Pan, Woon-Puay Koh
{"title":"食用超加工食品与全因和特定原因死亡风险:新加坡华人健康研究","authors":"Yue Li, Xianli Li, An Pan, Woon-Puay Koh","doi":"10.1186/s12937-025-01219-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although higher intake of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) has been associated with a higher risk of mortality in Western populations such as populations from France and the United States (US), evidence in Asian populations remains limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between UPF consumption and the risk of mortality in an Asian population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 62,197 middle-aged and older Chinese adults who were recruited for the Singapore Chinese Health Study from 1993 to 1998. UPFs were defined from items in the FFQ using the Nova classification, and their consumption was categorized into quintiles according to intake level. Mortality from all-cause, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), cancer, and respiratory diseases were ascertained via Linkage with a nationwide registry through 2022. Associations between UPF intake and mortality were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 24.9 years (median) of follow-up, 29,472 deaths occurred. In the multivariable-adjusted model (variables related to demographics, anthropometric data, lifestyle factors, medical history, and total energy intake), compared with the lowest quintile of UPF consumption, the highest quintile was associated with higher risks of mortality from all-cause [hazard ratio (HR): 1.06; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02-1.10], CVDs (HR: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.01-1.15), and respiratory diseases (HR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.02-1.19), but not of mortality from cancer (HR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.94-1.07). The associations remained essentially unchanged after further adjusting for diet quality measured using the Alternative Healthy Eating Index-2010 and antioxidant capacity using the Vitamin C Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity. Among the subgroups of UPFs, positive associations with all-cause mortality were observed for consumption of sweetened beverages (e.g. soft drinks) and sugary products (e.g. crackers and western cakes). This association was stronger in participants who were non-smokers at recruitment [respective HR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.03-1.13 in non-smokers versus HR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.94-1.08 in smokers (P for interaction = 0.03)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Higher intake of UPFs was associated with higher risks of mortality from all-cause, CVDs, and respiratory diseases in an Asian population. These results need to be confirmed in other Asian populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":19203,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition Journal","volume":"24 1","pages":"146"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12481944/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consumption of ultra-processed foods and risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality: the Singapore Chinese health study.\",\"authors\":\"Yue Li, Xianli Li, An Pan, Woon-Puay Koh\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12937-025-01219-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although higher intake of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) has been associated with a higher risk of mortality in Western populations such as populations from France and the United States (US), evidence in Asian populations remains limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between UPF consumption and the risk of mortality in an Asian population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 62,197 middle-aged and older Chinese adults who were recruited for the Singapore Chinese Health Study from 1993 to 1998. UPFs were defined from items in the FFQ using the Nova classification, and their consumption was categorized into quintiles according to intake level. Mortality from all-cause, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), cancer, and respiratory diseases were ascertained via Linkage with a nationwide registry through 2022. Associations between UPF intake and mortality were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 24.9 years (median) of follow-up, 29,472 deaths occurred. In the multivariable-adjusted model (variables related to demographics, anthropometric data, lifestyle factors, medical history, and total energy intake), compared with the lowest quintile of UPF consumption, the highest quintile was associated with higher risks of mortality from all-cause [hazard ratio (HR): 1.06; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02-1.10], CVDs (HR: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.01-1.15), and respiratory diseases (HR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.02-1.19), but not of mortality from cancer (HR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.94-1.07). The associations remained essentially unchanged after further adjusting for diet quality measured using the Alternative Healthy Eating Index-2010 and antioxidant capacity using the Vitamin C Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity. Among the subgroups of UPFs, positive associations with all-cause mortality were observed for consumption of sweetened beverages (e.g. soft drinks) and sugary products (e.g. crackers and western cakes). This association was stronger in participants who were non-smokers at recruitment [respective HR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.03-1.13 in non-smokers versus HR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.94-1.08 in smokers (P for interaction = 0.03)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Higher intake of UPFs was associated with higher risks of mortality from all-cause, CVDs, and respiratory diseases in an Asian population. These results need to be confirmed in other Asian populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition Journal\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"146\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12481944/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-025-01219-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-025-01219-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管在法国和美国等西方人群中,超加工食品(upf)的高摄入量与较高的死亡风险相关,但在亚洲人群中的证据仍然有限。本研究的目的是评估UPF消费与亚洲人群死亡风险之间的关系。方法:我们纳入了1993年至1998年新加坡华人健康研究中招募的62197名中老年中国成年人。upf使用Nova分类从FFQ中的项目中定义,并根据摄入水平将其消耗分为五分位数。全因死亡率、心血管疾病(cvd)、癌症和呼吸系统疾病的死亡率通过与全国性登记处的联系确定至2022年。使用Cox比例风险回归模型评估UPF摄入量与死亡率之间的关系。结果:随访24.9年(中位)后,发生29,472例死亡。在多变量调整模型(与人口统计学、人体测量数据、生活方式因素、病史和总能量摄入相关的变量)中,与UPF消费最低的五分位数相比,最高的五分位数与全因死亡风险较高相关[危险比(HR): 1.06;95%可信区间(CI): 1.02-1.10]、心血管疾病(HR: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.01-1.15)和呼吸系统疾病(HR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.02-1.19),但与癌症死亡率无关(HR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.94-1.07)。在进一步调整了使用替代健康饮食指数-2010测量的饮食质量和使用维生素C等效抗氧化能力测量的抗氧化能力后,这种关联基本保持不变。在upf的亚组中,观察到含糖饮料(如软饮料)和含糖产品(如饼干和西式蛋糕)的消费与全因死亡率呈正相关。在招募时不吸烟的参与者中,这种关联更强[非吸烟者的HR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.03-1.13, HR: 1.01;吸烟者的95% CI: 0.94-1.08(相互作用P = 0.03)。结论:在亚洲人群中,较高的upf摄入量与全因死亡风险、心血管疾病和呼吸系统疾病相关。这些结果需要在其他亚洲人群中得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Consumption of ultra-processed foods and risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality: the Singapore Chinese health study.

Background: Although higher intake of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) has been associated with a higher risk of mortality in Western populations such as populations from France and the United States (US), evidence in Asian populations remains limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between UPF consumption and the risk of mortality in an Asian population.

Methods: We included 62,197 middle-aged and older Chinese adults who were recruited for the Singapore Chinese Health Study from 1993 to 1998. UPFs were defined from items in the FFQ using the Nova classification, and their consumption was categorized into quintiles according to intake level. Mortality from all-cause, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), cancer, and respiratory diseases were ascertained via Linkage with a nationwide registry through 2022. Associations between UPF intake and mortality were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression models.

Results: After 24.9 years (median) of follow-up, 29,472 deaths occurred. In the multivariable-adjusted model (variables related to demographics, anthropometric data, lifestyle factors, medical history, and total energy intake), compared with the lowest quintile of UPF consumption, the highest quintile was associated with higher risks of mortality from all-cause [hazard ratio (HR): 1.06; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02-1.10], CVDs (HR: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.01-1.15), and respiratory diseases (HR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.02-1.19), but not of mortality from cancer (HR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.94-1.07). The associations remained essentially unchanged after further adjusting for diet quality measured using the Alternative Healthy Eating Index-2010 and antioxidant capacity using the Vitamin C Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity. Among the subgroups of UPFs, positive associations with all-cause mortality were observed for consumption of sweetened beverages (e.g. soft drinks) and sugary products (e.g. crackers and western cakes). This association was stronger in participants who were non-smokers at recruitment [respective HR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.03-1.13 in non-smokers versus HR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.94-1.08 in smokers (P for interaction = 0.03)].

Conclusion: Higher intake of UPFs was associated with higher risks of mortality from all-cause, CVDs, and respiratory diseases in an Asian population. These results need to be confirmed in other Asian populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition Journal
Nutrition Journal NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition Journal publishes surveillance, epidemiologic, and intervention research that sheds light on i) influences (e.g., familial, environmental) on eating patterns; ii) associations between eating patterns and health, and iii) strategies to improve eating patterns among populations. The journal also welcomes manuscripts reporting on the psychometric properties (e.g., validity, reliability) and feasibility of methods (e.g., for assessing dietary intake) for human nutrition research. In addition, study protocols for controlled trials and cohort studies, with an emphasis on methods for assessing dietary exposures and outcomes as well as intervention components, will be considered. Manuscripts that consider eating patterns holistically, as opposed to solely reductionist approaches that focus on specific dietary components in isolation, are encouraged. Also encouraged are papers that take a holistic or systems perspective in attempting to understand possible compensatory and differential effects of nutrition interventions. The journal does not consider animal studies. In addition to the influence of eating patterns for human health, we also invite research providing insights into the environmental sustainability of dietary practices. Again, a holistic perspective is encouraged, for example, through the consideration of how eating patterns might maximize both human and planetary health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信