dexamethone -sparing方案联合daratumumab和来那度胺治疗虚弱和新诊断的多发性骨髓瘤患者的安全性和有效性(IFM2017-03):一项开放标签、多中心、随机对照的3期试验

Salomon Manier, Jérôme Lambert, Cyrille Hulin, Margaret Macro, Kamel Laribi, Carla Araujo, Gian Matteo Pica, Cyrille Touzeau, Pascal Godmer, Borhane Slama, Lionel Karlin, Frédéric Orsini Piocelle, Mamoun Dib, Laurence Sanhes, Pierre Morel, Abderazzak El Yamani, Mourad Tiab, Reza Tabrizi, Valentine Richez, Laurent Garderet, Thierry Facon
{"title":"dexamethone -sparing方案联合daratumumab和来那度胺治疗虚弱和新诊断的多发性骨髓瘤患者的安全性和有效性(IFM2017-03):一项开放标签、多中心、随机对照的3期试验","authors":"Salomon Manier, Jérôme Lambert, Cyrille Hulin, Margaret Macro, Kamel Laribi, Carla Araujo, Gian Matteo Pica, Cyrille Touzeau, Pascal Godmer, Borhane Slama, Lionel Karlin, Frédéric Orsini Piocelle, Mamoun Dib, Laurence Sanhes, Pierre Morel, Abderazzak El Yamani, Mourad Tiab, Reza Tabrizi, Valentine Richez, Laurent Garderet, Thierry Facon","doi":"10.1016/s1470-2045(25)00280-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background</h3>Patients with frailty and newly diagnosed multiple myeloma have worse outcomes due to higher rates of adverse events (AEs) and treatment discontinuation. This study evaluated a dexamethasone-sparing regimen of daratumumab plus lenalidomide versus lenalidomide plus dexamethasone in frail patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.<h3>Methods</h3>In this prospective, randomised, open-label trial, conducted at 61 active Intergroup Francophone of Myeloma centres, patients aged 65 years or older with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group proxy frailty score of 2 or more were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive daratumumab (1800 mg subcutaneously) plus oral lenalidomide (25 mg daily for 21 days of a 28 day cycle) and dexamethasone (20mg weekly) for two cycles (dexamethasone-sparing group) or lenalidomide (25 mg daily) and oral dexamethasone (20 mg weekly; control group), with stratification by International Staging System, age, and centre. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Efficacy was assessed in the intention-to-treat population and safety was assessed in all patients exposed to at least one dose of randomised intervention. This trial is registered with <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg aria-label=\"Opens in new window\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"20\" viewbox=\"0 0 8 8\"><path d=\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\"></path></svg></span>, <span><span>NCT03993912</span><svg aria-label=\"Opens in new window\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"20\" viewbox=\"0 0 8 8\"><path d=\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\"></path></svg></span>, and is complete.<h3>Findings</h3>From Oct 18, 2019 to July 20, 2021, 335 patients were screened, of whom 295 patients were randomly assigned (200 to lenalidomide plus daratumumab, 95 to lenalidomide plus dexamethasone). The median age was 81 years (IQR 77–84), with 180 (61%) aged older than 80 years, and 151 (51%) patients were female and 144 (49%) were male. Median follow-up was 46·3 months (IQR 46·0–52·7). Median progression-free survival was 53·4 months (95% CI 35·3–not reached) in the dexamethasone-sparing group versus 22·5 months (16·5–39·0) in the control group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·51, 95% CI 0·37–0·70, p&lt;0·0001). The most common grade 3–5 AEs were neutropenia (110 [55%] of 200 patients in the dexamethasone-sparing group <em>vs</em> 23 [24%] of 95 patients in the control group), and infection (38 [19%] <em>vs</em> 20 [21%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 126 patients (63%) in the dexamethasone-sparing group and 66 patients (69%) in the control group. AEs leading to death occurred in 23 patients (12%) in the dexamethasone-sparing group and 12 patients (13%) in the control group, with 4 (2%) and 2 (2%) grade 5 treatment-emergent adverse events, respectively.<h3>Interpretation</h3>In the IFM2017-03 trial, use of lenalidomide plus daratumumab, with dexamethasone limited to the first 2 treatment cycles, reduced the risk of progression or death compared with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone, with no additional safety concerns. Lenalidomide plus daratumumab could therefore be considered as a treatment option for older patients with frailty and newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.<h3>Funding</h3>The study was funded by Johnson &amp; Johnson.","PeriodicalId":22865,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Oncology","volume":"202 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and efficacy of a dexamethasone-sparing regimen with daratumumab and lenalidomide in patients with frailty and newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (IFM2017-03): a phase 3, open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Salomon Manier, Jérôme Lambert, Cyrille Hulin, Margaret Macro, Kamel Laribi, Carla Araujo, Gian Matteo Pica, Cyrille Touzeau, Pascal Godmer, Borhane Slama, Lionel Karlin, Frédéric Orsini Piocelle, Mamoun Dib, Laurence Sanhes, Pierre Morel, Abderazzak El Yamani, Mourad Tiab, Reza Tabrizi, Valentine Richez, Laurent Garderet, Thierry Facon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/s1470-2045(25)00280-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Background</h3>Patients with frailty and newly diagnosed multiple myeloma have worse outcomes due to higher rates of adverse events (AEs) and treatment discontinuation. This study evaluated a dexamethasone-sparing regimen of daratumumab plus lenalidomide versus lenalidomide plus dexamethasone in frail patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.<h3>Methods</h3>In this prospective, randomised, open-label trial, conducted at 61 active Intergroup Francophone of Myeloma centres, patients aged 65 years or older with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group proxy frailty score of 2 or more were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive daratumumab (1800 mg subcutaneously) plus oral lenalidomide (25 mg daily for 21 days of a 28 day cycle) and dexamethasone (20mg weekly) for two cycles (dexamethasone-sparing group) or lenalidomide (25 mg daily) and oral dexamethasone (20 mg weekly; control group), with stratification by International Staging System, age, and centre. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Efficacy was assessed in the intention-to-treat population and safety was assessed in all patients exposed to at least one dose of randomised intervention. This trial is registered with <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg aria-label=\\\"Opens in new window\\\" focusable=\\\"false\\\" height=\\\"20\\\" viewbox=\\\"0 0 8 8\\\"><path d=\\\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\\\"></path></svg></span>, <span><span>NCT03993912</span><svg aria-label=\\\"Opens in new window\\\" focusable=\\\"false\\\" height=\\\"20\\\" viewbox=\\\"0 0 8 8\\\"><path d=\\\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\\\"></path></svg></span>, and is complete.<h3>Findings</h3>From Oct 18, 2019 to July 20, 2021, 335 patients were screened, of whom 295 patients were randomly assigned (200 to lenalidomide plus daratumumab, 95 to lenalidomide plus dexamethasone). The median age was 81 years (IQR 77–84), with 180 (61%) aged older than 80 years, and 151 (51%) patients were female and 144 (49%) were male. Median follow-up was 46·3 months (IQR 46·0–52·7). Median progression-free survival was 53·4 months (95% CI 35·3–not reached) in the dexamethasone-sparing group versus 22·5 months (16·5–39·0) in the control group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·51, 95% CI 0·37–0·70, p&lt;0·0001). The most common grade 3–5 AEs were neutropenia (110 [55%] of 200 patients in the dexamethasone-sparing group <em>vs</em> 23 [24%] of 95 patients in the control group), and infection (38 [19%] <em>vs</em> 20 [21%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 126 patients (63%) in the dexamethasone-sparing group and 66 patients (69%) in the control group. AEs leading to death occurred in 23 patients (12%) in the dexamethasone-sparing group and 12 patients (13%) in the control group, with 4 (2%) and 2 (2%) grade 5 treatment-emergent adverse events, respectively.<h3>Interpretation</h3>In the IFM2017-03 trial, use of lenalidomide plus daratumumab, with dexamethasone limited to the first 2 treatment cycles, reduced the risk of progression or death compared with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone, with no additional safety concerns. Lenalidomide plus daratumumab could therefore be considered as a treatment option for older patients with frailty and newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.<h3>Funding</h3>The study was funded by Johnson &amp; Johnson.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Lancet Oncology\",\"volume\":\"202 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Lancet Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(25)00280-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(25)00280-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虚弱和新诊断的多发性骨髓瘤患者由于不良事件(ae)和治疗中断率较高,预后较差。这项研究评估了达拉单抗+来那度胺与来那度胺+地塞米松在新诊断的多发性骨髓瘤体弱患者中的地塞米松节约方案。这项前瞻性、随机、开放标签试验在61个活跃的法语组间骨髓瘤中心进行。65岁及以上的新诊断多发性骨髓瘤和东部肿瘤合作组代理衰弱评分为2或以上的患者被随机分配为2:1,接受达拉单抗(1800mg皮下注射)加口服来那度胺(25mg每天,28天周期21天)和地塞米松(20mg每周)两个周期(地塞米松保留组)或来那度胺(25mg每天)和口服地塞米松(20mg每周;对照组),按国际分期系统、年龄、中心进行分层。主要终点为无进展生存期。在意向治疗人群中评估了疗效,在所有暴露于至少一剂量随机干预的患者中评估了安全性。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号NCT03993912,并且已经完成。从2019年10月18日至2021年7月20日,筛选了335例患者,其中295例患者随机分配(200例来那度胺+达拉单抗,95例来那度胺+地塞米松)。中位年龄为81岁(IQR 77 ~ 84),其中80岁以上患者180例(61%),女性151例(51%),男性144例(49%)。中位随访46.3个月(IQR 46.0 ~ 52.7)。地塞米松保留组的中位无进展生存期为53.4个月(95% CI 35.3 -未达到),对照组为22.5个月(16.5 - 39.0)(风险比[HR] 0.51, 95% CI 0.37 - 0.70, p< 0.0001)。最常见的3-5级ae是中性粒细胞减少症(地塞米松保留组200例患者中110例[55%]vs对照组95例患者中23例[24%])和感染(38例[19%]vs 20例[21%])。地塞米松保留组126例(63%)患者发生严重不良事件,对照组66例(69%)患者发生严重不良事件。地塞米松保留组中有23例(12%)患者和对照组中有12例(13%)患者发生了导致死亡的不良事件,其中治疗后出现的5级不良事件分别为4例(2%)和2例(2%)。在IFM2017-03试验中,与来那度胺加地塞米松相比,来那度胺加达拉单抗与地塞米松限制在前2个治疗周期的使用降低了进展或死亡的风险,没有额外的安全性问题。因此,来那度胺加达拉单抗可以被认为是老年虚弱和新诊断的多发性骨髓瘤患者的治疗选择。这项研究由强生公司资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety and efficacy of a dexamethasone-sparing regimen with daratumumab and lenalidomide in patients with frailty and newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (IFM2017-03): a phase 3, open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial

Background

Patients with frailty and newly diagnosed multiple myeloma have worse outcomes due to higher rates of adverse events (AEs) and treatment discontinuation. This study evaluated a dexamethasone-sparing regimen of daratumumab plus lenalidomide versus lenalidomide plus dexamethasone in frail patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Methods

In this prospective, randomised, open-label trial, conducted at 61 active Intergroup Francophone of Myeloma centres, patients aged 65 years or older with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group proxy frailty score of 2 or more were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive daratumumab (1800 mg subcutaneously) plus oral lenalidomide (25 mg daily for 21 days of a 28 day cycle) and dexamethasone (20mg weekly) for two cycles (dexamethasone-sparing group) or lenalidomide (25 mg daily) and oral dexamethasone (20 mg weekly; control group), with stratification by International Staging System, age, and centre. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Efficacy was assessed in the intention-to-treat population and safety was assessed in all patients exposed to at least one dose of randomised intervention. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03993912, and is complete.

Findings

From Oct 18, 2019 to July 20, 2021, 335 patients were screened, of whom 295 patients were randomly assigned (200 to lenalidomide plus daratumumab, 95 to lenalidomide plus dexamethasone). The median age was 81 years (IQR 77–84), with 180 (61%) aged older than 80 years, and 151 (51%) patients were female and 144 (49%) were male. Median follow-up was 46·3 months (IQR 46·0–52·7). Median progression-free survival was 53·4 months (95% CI 35·3–not reached) in the dexamethasone-sparing group versus 22·5 months (16·5–39·0) in the control group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·51, 95% CI 0·37–0·70, p<0·0001). The most common grade 3–5 AEs were neutropenia (110 [55%] of 200 patients in the dexamethasone-sparing group vs 23 [24%] of 95 patients in the control group), and infection (38 [19%] vs 20 [21%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 126 patients (63%) in the dexamethasone-sparing group and 66 patients (69%) in the control group. AEs leading to death occurred in 23 patients (12%) in the dexamethasone-sparing group and 12 patients (13%) in the control group, with 4 (2%) and 2 (2%) grade 5 treatment-emergent adverse events, respectively.

Interpretation

In the IFM2017-03 trial, use of lenalidomide plus daratumumab, with dexamethasone limited to the first 2 treatment cycles, reduced the risk of progression or death compared with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone, with no additional safety concerns. Lenalidomide plus daratumumab could therefore be considered as a treatment option for older patients with frailty and newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Funding

The study was funded by Johnson & Johnson.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信