Maria M Arredondo, Marissa Vasquez Martinez, Liliana Beltran, Claudia Méndez López, Susan A Gelman
{"title":"方言、性别和种族在儿童友谊选择中的作用:来自墨西哥单语者和墨西哥-美国双语者的证据。","authors":"Maria M Arredondo, Marissa Vasquez Martinez, Liliana Beltran, Claudia Méndez López, Susan A Gelman","doi":"10.1080/15248372.2025.2470239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This work investigated whether Mexican-American bilingual children and Mexican monolingual children (ages 4-6; <i>N</i> = 245) use Spanish varieties (Puerto Rican vs. Mexican) when making friendship judgments for themselves (1<sup>st</sup> person) and/or for others (3<sup>rd</sup> person), and whether children prioritize dialect varieties over race and gender categories. On a dialect discrimination task, both groups of children distinguished between the Spanish varieties. When choosing a friend for themselves (1<sup>st</sup> person judgments), both groups of children preferred a character who spoke their own dialect (Mexican Spanish over Puerto Rican Spanish), but only when gender and race were held constant; this preference was stronger for monolingual Mexican children than for bilingual Mexican-American children. In contrast, neither group used dialect cues to guide judgments about others' friendship preferences (3<sup>rd</sup> person). For Mexican monolingual children, their friendship judgments (on both 1<sup>st</sup> and 3<sup>rd</sup> person tasks, when gender and race were held constant) were related to their ability to discriminate between the dialects, but this was not the case for bilinguals. Finally, neither group made use of dialect variety in their social judgments when this factor was pitted against a character's gender or race. Instead, both groups predominantly used gender as a basis for friendship judgments. These results indicate an early sensitivity to linguistic dialect in young children's social judgments, as well as boundary conditions on the use of this information. The findings also reveal differences in children's use of dialect cues as a function of the linguistic and cultural context in which they live in.</p>","PeriodicalId":47680,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognition and Development","volume":"26 4","pages":"600-629"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12463405/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of dialect, gender, and race in children's friendship choices: Evidence from Mexican monolinguals and Mexican-American bilinguals.\",\"authors\":\"Maria M Arredondo, Marissa Vasquez Martinez, Liliana Beltran, Claudia Méndez López, Susan A Gelman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15248372.2025.2470239\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This work investigated whether Mexican-American bilingual children and Mexican monolingual children (ages 4-6; <i>N</i> = 245) use Spanish varieties (Puerto Rican vs. Mexican) when making friendship judgments for themselves (1<sup>st</sup> person) and/or for others (3<sup>rd</sup> person), and whether children prioritize dialect varieties over race and gender categories. On a dialect discrimination task, both groups of children distinguished between the Spanish varieties. When choosing a friend for themselves (1<sup>st</sup> person judgments), both groups of children preferred a character who spoke their own dialect (Mexican Spanish over Puerto Rican Spanish), but only when gender and race were held constant; this preference was stronger for monolingual Mexican children than for bilingual Mexican-American children. In contrast, neither group used dialect cues to guide judgments about others' friendship preferences (3<sup>rd</sup> person). For Mexican monolingual children, their friendship judgments (on both 1<sup>st</sup> and 3<sup>rd</sup> person tasks, when gender and race were held constant) were related to their ability to discriminate between the dialects, but this was not the case for bilinguals. Finally, neither group made use of dialect variety in their social judgments when this factor was pitted against a character's gender or race. Instead, both groups predominantly used gender as a basis for friendship judgments. These results indicate an early sensitivity to linguistic dialect in young children's social judgments, as well as boundary conditions on the use of this information. The findings also reveal differences in children's use of dialect cues as a function of the linguistic and cultural context in which they live in.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cognition and Development\",\"volume\":\"26 4\",\"pages\":\"600-629\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12463405/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cognition and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2025.2470239\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognition and Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2025.2470239","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
The role of dialect, gender, and race in children's friendship choices: Evidence from Mexican monolinguals and Mexican-American bilinguals.
This work investigated whether Mexican-American bilingual children and Mexican monolingual children (ages 4-6; N = 245) use Spanish varieties (Puerto Rican vs. Mexican) when making friendship judgments for themselves (1st person) and/or for others (3rd person), and whether children prioritize dialect varieties over race and gender categories. On a dialect discrimination task, both groups of children distinguished between the Spanish varieties. When choosing a friend for themselves (1st person judgments), both groups of children preferred a character who spoke their own dialect (Mexican Spanish over Puerto Rican Spanish), but only when gender and race were held constant; this preference was stronger for monolingual Mexican children than for bilingual Mexican-American children. In contrast, neither group used dialect cues to guide judgments about others' friendship preferences (3rd person). For Mexican monolingual children, their friendship judgments (on both 1st and 3rd person tasks, when gender and race were held constant) were related to their ability to discriminate between the dialects, but this was not the case for bilinguals. Finally, neither group made use of dialect variety in their social judgments when this factor was pitted against a character's gender or race. Instead, both groups predominantly used gender as a basis for friendship judgments. These results indicate an early sensitivity to linguistic dialect in young children's social judgments, as well as boundary conditions on the use of this information. The findings also reveal differences in children's use of dialect cues as a function of the linguistic and cultural context in which they live in.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cognition and Development is the official journal of the Cognitive Development Society (CDS). Some CDS members are concerned with basic research or theory; others focus on policy issues and practical applications. The range of interests includes cognitive development during all stages of life, and we seek to understand ontogenetic processes in both humans and nonhumans. Finally, their interests encompass typical as well as atypical development, and we attempt to characterize both biological and cultural influences on cognitive change and continuity.