智障人士全纳大学的个人、社会和职业成果。

IF 2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Mary-Ann O'Donovan, Nikki Wedgwood, Greta Westermann, Fiona Rillotta, Tess Aitken
{"title":"智障人士全纳大学的个人、社会和职业成果。","authors":"Mary-Ann O'Donovan, Nikki Wedgwood, Greta Westermann, Fiona Rillotta, Tess Aitken","doi":"10.1111/jir.70042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Though people with intellectual disability have historically been excluded from university education, over the past three decades programmes facilitating the inclusion of people with intellectual disability in higher education, including university, have been developed in some jurisdictions such as the United States, Canada, Ireland, Europe and Australia. There is limited examination of the full range of potential outcomes for students with intellectual disability participating in such programmes. Such research rarely explores barriers and facilitators in relation to particular programme models and the achievement of the potential outcomes. The current study set out to examine the range of outcomes associated with inclusive university programmes, with a particular focus on autonomy, self-confidence, inclusion and employment.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>For this scoping review, six academic databases were searched using broad search terms. Forty-five studies meeting our inclusion criteria were subjected to quality assessment to ensure only high-quality evidence informed data analysis. Twenty-two studies were included in the final review, from which data were extracted to answer our research question.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students were reported to achieve outcomes related to employment, confidence, autonomy and social skills. Factors reported as either facilitating or impeding positive personal, vocational and/or socio-emotional outcomes for students with intellectual disability participating in inclusive university programmes included accessibility, expectations, supports, attitudes and acceptance, pedagogy and programme design.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Programmes that provide individualised support for the inclusion of people with intellectual disability in university life led to primarily positive outcomes for people with intellectual disability. We argue that a whole-of-university approach to supporting full and genuine inclusion of students with intellectual disability is needed and we provide recommendations for research and practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":16163,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personal, Social and Vocational Outcomes of Inclusive University for People With Intellectual Disability.\",\"authors\":\"Mary-Ann O'Donovan, Nikki Wedgwood, Greta Westermann, Fiona Rillotta, Tess Aitken\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jir.70042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Though people with intellectual disability have historically been excluded from university education, over the past three decades programmes facilitating the inclusion of people with intellectual disability in higher education, including university, have been developed in some jurisdictions such as the United States, Canada, Ireland, Europe and Australia. There is limited examination of the full range of potential outcomes for students with intellectual disability participating in such programmes. Such research rarely explores barriers and facilitators in relation to particular programme models and the achievement of the potential outcomes. The current study set out to examine the range of outcomes associated with inclusive university programmes, with a particular focus on autonomy, self-confidence, inclusion and employment.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>For this scoping review, six academic databases were searched using broad search terms. Forty-five studies meeting our inclusion criteria were subjected to quality assessment to ensure only high-quality evidence informed data analysis. Twenty-two studies were included in the final review, from which data were extracted to answer our research question.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students were reported to achieve outcomes related to employment, confidence, autonomy and social skills. Factors reported as either facilitating or impeding positive personal, vocational and/or socio-emotional outcomes for students with intellectual disability participating in inclusive university programmes included accessibility, expectations, supports, attitudes and acceptance, pedagogy and programme design.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Programmes that provide individualised support for the inclusion of people with intellectual disability in university life led to primarily positive outcomes for people with intellectual disability. We argue that a whole-of-university approach to supporting full and genuine inclusion of students with intellectual disability is needed and we provide recommendations for research and practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.70042\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.70042","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然智障人士历来被排除在大学教育之外,但在过去三十年中,一些司法管辖区(如美国、加拿大、爱尔兰、欧洲和澳大利亚)已经制定了促进智障人士接受高等教育(包括大学教育)的计划。对参加这些项目的智障学生的潜在结果进行的全面调查有限。这种研究很少探讨与特定方案模式和实现潜在成果有关的障碍和促进因素。目前的研究旨在研究与包容性大学课程相关的一系列结果,特别关注自主、自信、包容和就业。方法:在此范围综述中,使用广义检索词检索了六个学术数据库。45项符合纳入标准的研究进行了质量评估,以确保只有高质量的证据支持数据分析。最终的综述纳入了22项研究,从中提取数据来回答我们的研究问题。结果:据报道,学生们在就业、自信、自主和社交技能方面取得了成绩。据报告,促进或阻碍智障学生参加包容性大学课程取得积极的个人、职业和/或社会情感成果的因素包括无障碍、期望、支持、态度和接受、教学法和课程设计。结论:为智障人士融入大学生活提供个性化支持的项目对智障人士的影响主要是积极的。我们认为,整个大学的方法来支持智力残疾学生的充分和真正的包容是必要的,我们为研究和实践提供建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Personal, Social and Vocational Outcomes of Inclusive University for People With Intellectual Disability.

Background: Though people with intellectual disability have historically been excluded from university education, over the past three decades programmes facilitating the inclusion of people with intellectual disability in higher education, including university, have been developed in some jurisdictions such as the United States, Canada, Ireland, Europe and Australia. There is limited examination of the full range of potential outcomes for students with intellectual disability participating in such programmes. Such research rarely explores barriers and facilitators in relation to particular programme models and the achievement of the potential outcomes. The current study set out to examine the range of outcomes associated with inclusive university programmes, with a particular focus on autonomy, self-confidence, inclusion and employment.

Method: For this scoping review, six academic databases were searched using broad search terms. Forty-five studies meeting our inclusion criteria were subjected to quality assessment to ensure only high-quality evidence informed data analysis. Twenty-two studies were included in the final review, from which data were extracted to answer our research question.

Results: Students were reported to achieve outcomes related to employment, confidence, autonomy and social skills. Factors reported as either facilitating or impeding positive personal, vocational and/or socio-emotional outcomes for students with intellectual disability participating in inclusive university programmes included accessibility, expectations, supports, attitudes and acceptance, pedagogy and programme design.

Conclusions: Programmes that provide individualised support for the inclusion of people with intellectual disability in university life led to primarily positive outcomes for people with intellectual disability. We argue that a whole-of-university approach to supporting full and genuine inclusion of students with intellectual disability is needed and we provide recommendations for research and practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: The Journal of Intellectual Disability Research is devoted exclusively to the scientific study of intellectual disability and publishes papers reporting original observations in this field. The subject matter is broad and includes, but is not restricted to, findings from biological, educational, genetic, medical, psychiatric, psychological and sociological studies, and ethical, philosophical, and legal contributions that increase knowledge on the treatment and prevention of intellectual disability and of associated impairments and disabilities, and/or inform public policy and practice. Expert reviews on themes in which recent research has produced notable advances will be included. Such reviews will normally be by invitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信