小细胞肺癌患者EORTC QLQ-C30和QLQ-LC13有意义变化阈值的推导

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Franziska Dirnberger, Jessie Wang, Bellinda King-Kallimanis, Kim Cocks, George Skingley, Nathan Clarke, Shuang Huang, Sujoy Mukherjee, Michael Koller
{"title":"小细胞肺癌患者EORTC QLQ-C30和QLQ-LC13有意义变化阈值的推导","authors":"Franziska Dirnberger, Jessie Wang, Bellinda King-Kallimanis, Kim Cocks, George Skingley, Nathan Clarke, Shuang Huang, Sujoy Mukherjee, Michael Koller","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2025.09.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is associated with poor survival and is accompanied by symptoms that impact patients' quality of life. Although quality of life can be assessed by the EORTC 30-item core questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and 13-item lung cancer (QLQ-LC13) module, interpretation of meaningful improvement or deterioration within and between individuals is challenging. The objective of this study was to derive thresholds for interpretation of changes over time for the key scales of Coughing, Chest Pain, Dyspnea, Physical Functioning and Global Health Status (GHS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Anchor- and distribution-based analyses were employed to derive meaningful within-patient change (MWPC) and meaningful between-group difference (MBGD) thresholds using data from the phase II DeLLphi-301 trial in patients with previously treated SCLC. Methods included estimating mean change scores, mixed models for repeated measures, classification statistics, receiver operating characteristic curves, alongside calculating half standard deviation and standard error of measurement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MWPC recommendations were ±33.3 for single item scales QLQ-LC13 Chest Pain and Coughing, ±16.7 for both QLQ-LC13 Dyspnea and QLQ-C30 GHS, and ±20.0 for QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning. Estimated MBGD thresholds ranged from ±6 for GHS to ±22 for Coughing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study is the first to estimate MWPC and MBGD thresholds specifically in patients with relapsed SCLC. Estimated threshold ranges are considered robust given the comprehensive considerations and triangulation of various methods and can help clinicians, researchers, and healthcare decision makers to evaluate the clinical meaningfulness to patients of changes in key SCLC scales over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":23508,"journal":{"name":"Value in Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Derivation of Meaningful Change Thresholds for EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13 in Patients with Small Cell Lung Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Franziska Dirnberger, Jessie Wang, Bellinda King-Kallimanis, Kim Cocks, George Skingley, Nathan Clarke, Shuang Huang, Sujoy Mukherjee, Michael Koller\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jval.2025.09.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is associated with poor survival and is accompanied by symptoms that impact patients' quality of life. Although quality of life can be assessed by the EORTC 30-item core questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and 13-item lung cancer (QLQ-LC13) module, interpretation of meaningful improvement or deterioration within and between individuals is challenging. The objective of this study was to derive thresholds for interpretation of changes over time for the key scales of Coughing, Chest Pain, Dyspnea, Physical Functioning and Global Health Status (GHS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Anchor- and distribution-based analyses were employed to derive meaningful within-patient change (MWPC) and meaningful between-group difference (MBGD) thresholds using data from the phase II DeLLphi-301 trial in patients with previously treated SCLC. Methods included estimating mean change scores, mixed models for repeated measures, classification statistics, receiver operating characteristic curves, alongside calculating half standard deviation and standard error of measurement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MWPC recommendations were ±33.3 for single item scales QLQ-LC13 Chest Pain and Coughing, ±16.7 for both QLQ-LC13 Dyspnea and QLQ-C30 GHS, and ±20.0 for QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning. Estimated MBGD thresholds ranged from ±6 for GHS to ±22 for Coughing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study is the first to estimate MWPC and MBGD thresholds specifically in patients with relapsed SCLC. Estimated threshold ranges are considered robust given the comprehensive considerations and triangulation of various methods and can help clinicians, researchers, and healthcare decision makers to evaluate the clinical meaningfulness to patients of changes in key SCLC scales over time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Value in Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Value in Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2025.09.011\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2025.09.011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:小细胞肺癌(SCLC)与低生存率相关,并伴有影响患者生活质量的症状。虽然生活质量可以通过EORTC的30项核心问卷(QLQ-C30)和13项肺癌模块(QLQ-LC13)进行评估,但解释个体内部和个体之间有意义的改善或恶化是具有挑战性的。本研究的目的是推导出解释咳嗽、胸痛、呼吸困难、身体功能和全球健康状况(GHS)关键量表随时间变化的阈值。方法:采用锚定和基于分布的分析,利用先前治疗过的SCLC患者的II期dell -301试验数据,得出有意义的患者内变化(MWPC)和有意义的组间差异(MBGD)阈值。方法包括估计平均变化评分、重复测量混合模型、分类统计、受试者工作特征曲线,并计算测量的半标准差和标准误差。结果:QLQ-LC13胸痛和咳嗽单项评分的MWPC推荐值为±33.3,QLQ-LC13呼吸困难和QLQ-C30 GHS单项评分的MWPC推荐值为±16.7,QLQ-C30身体功能评分的MWPC推荐值为±20.0。估计MBGD阈值范围从GHS的±6到咳嗽的±22。结论:本研究首次评估了复发SCLC患者的MWPC和MBGD阈值。考虑到各种方法的综合考虑和三角测量,估计的阈值范围被认为是可靠的,可以帮助临床医生、研究人员和医疗保健决策者评估关键SCLC量表随时间变化对患者的临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Derivation of Meaningful Change Thresholds for EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13 in Patients with Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Objectives: Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is associated with poor survival and is accompanied by symptoms that impact patients' quality of life. Although quality of life can be assessed by the EORTC 30-item core questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and 13-item lung cancer (QLQ-LC13) module, interpretation of meaningful improvement or deterioration within and between individuals is challenging. The objective of this study was to derive thresholds for interpretation of changes over time for the key scales of Coughing, Chest Pain, Dyspnea, Physical Functioning and Global Health Status (GHS).

Methods: Anchor- and distribution-based analyses were employed to derive meaningful within-patient change (MWPC) and meaningful between-group difference (MBGD) thresholds using data from the phase II DeLLphi-301 trial in patients with previously treated SCLC. Methods included estimating mean change scores, mixed models for repeated measures, classification statistics, receiver operating characteristic curves, alongside calculating half standard deviation and standard error of measurement.

Results: MWPC recommendations were ±33.3 for single item scales QLQ-LC13 Chest Pain and Coughing, ±16.7 for both QLQ-LC13 Dyspnea and QLQ-C30 GHS, and ±20.0 for QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning. Estimated MBGD thresholds ranged from ±6 for GHS to ±22 for Coughing.

Conclusion: This study is the first to estimate MWPC and MBGD thresholds specifically in patients with relapsed SCLC. Estimated threshold ranges are considered robust given the comprehensive considerations and triangulation of various methods and can help clinicians, researchers, and healthcare decision makers to evaluate the clinical meaningfulness to patients of changes in key SCLC scales over time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Value in Health
Value in Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
3064
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Value in Health contains original research articles for pharmacoeconomics, health economics, and outcomes research (clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes/preference-based research), as well as conceptual and health policy articles that provide valuable information for health care decision-makers as well as the research community. As the official journal of ISPOR, Value in Health provides a forum for researchers, as well as health care decision-makers to translate outcomes research into health care decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信