快速纳米孔测序鉴定引起假体关节感染的细菌。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Hollie Wilkinson, Karina Wright, Helen S McCarthy, Jade Perry, Charlotte Hulme, Niall Steele, Benjamin Burston, Rob Townsend, Paul Cool
{"title":"快速纳米孔测序鉴定引起假体关节感染的细菌。","authors":"Hollie Wilkinson, Karina Wright, Helen S McCarthy, Jade Perry, Charlotte Hulme, Niall Steele, Benjamin Burston, Rob Townsend, Paul Cool","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics14090879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> The diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection remains difficult. Microbiological cultures frequently have false-positive and false-negative results. This study investigates whether rapid nanopore sequencing can be used to aid the identification of bacteria causing prosthetic joint infection for more timely identification and treatment. <b>Methods</b>: Nineteen patients who had revision surgery following total joint arthroplasty were included in this study. Of these, 15 patients had an infected joint arthroplasty. All patients had joint fluid aspirated at the time of revision surgery. The DNA was extracted from these fluid aspirates, and rapid nanopore sequencing was performed using the MinION device from Oxford Nanopore Technologies. The sequencing data was trimmed to improve quality and filtered to remove human reads using bioinformatic tools. Genomic sequence classification was performed using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool. The results were filtered by read length and sequence identity score. The European Bone and Joint Infection Society criteria were used as a standard to identify infected and not infected patients. Confusion tables were used to calculate accuracy and F1 score based on this criteria and the nanopore sequencing results. <b>Results</b>: Microbiological cultures and nanopore sequencing had an accuracy of 68% and 74%, respectively. However, combining both results predicted infection accurately in 94% of cases (F1 score 96%). <b>Conclusions</b>: Nanopore sequencing has the potential to aid identification of bacteria causing prosthetic joint infection and may be useful as a supplementary diagnostic tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":54246,"journal":{"name":"Antibiotics-Basel","volume":"14 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12466696/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rapid Nanopore Sequencing to Identify Bacteria Causing Prosthetic Joint Infections.\",\"authors\":\"Hollie Wilkinson, Karina Wright, Helen S McCarthy, Jade Perry, Charlotte Hulme, Niall Steele, Benjamin Burston, Rob Townsend, Paul Cool\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/antibiotics14090879\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> The diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection remains difficult. Microbiological cultures frequently have false-positive and false-negative results. This study investigates whether rapid nanopore sequencing can be used to aid the identification of bacteria causing prosthetic joint infection for more timely identification and treatment. <b>Methods</b>: Nineteen patients who had revision surgery following total joint arthroplasty were included in this study. Of these, 15 patients had an infected joint arthroplasty. All patients had joint fluid aspirated at the time of revision surgery. The DNA was extracted from these fluid aspirates, and rapid nanopore sequencing was performed using the MinION device from Oxford Nanopore Technologies. The sequencing data was trimmed to improve quality and filtered to remove human reads using bioinformatic tools. Genomic sequence classification was performed using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool. The results were filtered by read length and sequence identity score. The European Bone and Joint Infection Society criteria were used as a standard to identify infected and not infected patients. Confusion tables were used to calculate accuracy and F1 score based on this criteria and the nanopore sequencing results. <b>Results</b>: Microbiological cultures and nanopore sequencing had an accuracy of 68% and 74%, respectively. However, combining both results predicted infection accurately in 94% of cases (F1 score 96%). <b>Conclusions</b>: Nanopore sequencing has the potential to aid identification of bacteria causing prosthetic joint infection and may be useful as a supplementary diagnostic tool.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antibiotics-Basel\",\"volume\":\"14 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12466696/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antibiotics-Basel\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14090879\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antibiotics-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14090879","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:人工关节感染的诊断仍然很困难。微生物培养经常有假阳性和假阴性结果。本研究探讨快速纳米孔测序是否可以用于辅助鉴定引起假体关节感染的细菌,以便更及时地识别和治疗。方法:对19例全关节置换术后行翻修手术的患者进行研究。其中,15例患者有感染的关节置换术。所有患者在翻修手术时均有关节液抽吸。从这些流体中提取DNA,并使用牛津纳米孔技术公司的MinION设备进行快速纳米孔测序。测序数据被修剪以提高质量,并使用生物信息学工具过滤以去除人类reads。使用Basic Local Alignment Search Tool进行基因组序列分类。结果通过读取长度和序列一致性评分进行过滤。采用欧洲骨关节感染学会的标准作为鉴定感染和未感染患者的标准。根据该标准和纳米孔测序结果,使用混淆表计算准确性和F1分数。结果:微生物培养和纳米孔测序的准确度分别为68%和74%。然而,结合两种结果预测感染的准确率为94% (F1评分为96%)。结论:纳米孔测序有可能帮助鉴定引起假体关节感染的细菌,并可能作为一种有用的辅助诊断工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Rapid Nanopore Sequencing to Identify Bacteria Causing Prosthetic Joint Infections.

Rapid Nanopore Sequencing to Identify Bacteria Causing Prosthetic Joint Infections.

Background/Objectives: The diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection remains difficult. Microbiological cultures frequently have false-positive and false-negative results. This study investigates whether rapid nanopore sequencing can be used to aid the identification of bacteria causing prosthetic joint infection for more timely identification and treatment. Methods: Nineteen patients who had revision surgery following total joint arthroplasty were included in this study. Of these, 15 patients had an infected joint arthroplasty. All patients had joint fluid aspirated at the time of revision surgery. The DNA was extracted from these fluid aspirates, and rapid nanopore sequencing was performed using the MinION device from Oxford Nanopore Technologies. The sequencing data was trimmed to improve quality and filtered to remove human reads using bioinformatic tools. Genomic sequence classification was performed using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool. The results were filtered by read length and sequence identity score. The European Bone and Joint Infection Society criteria were used as a standard to identify infected and not infected patients. Confusion tables were used to calculate accuracy and F1 score based on this criteria and the nanopore sequencing results. Results: Microbiological cultures and nanopore sequencing had an accuracy of 68% and 74%, respectively. However, combining both results predicted infection accurately in 94% of cases (F1 score 96%). Conclusions: Nanopore sequencing has the potential to aid identification of bacteria causing prosthetic joint infection and may be useful as a supplementary diagnostic tool.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Antibiotics-Basel
Antibiotics-Basel Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
14.60%
发文量
1547
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Antibiotics (ISSN 2079-6382) is an open access, peer reviewed journal on all aspects of antibiotics. Antibiotics is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing the general fields of biochemistry, chemistry, genetics, microbiology and pharmacology. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信