Hollie Wilkinson, Karina Wright, Helen S McCarthy, Jade Perry, Charlotte Hulme, Niall Steele, Benjamin Burston, Rob Townsend, Paul Cool
{"title":"快速纳米孔测序鉴定引起假体关节感染的细菌。","authors":"Hollie Wilkinson, Karina Wright, Helen S McCarthy, Jade Perry, Charlotte Hulme, Niall Steele, Benjamin Burston, Rob Townsend, Paul Cool","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics14090879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> The diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection remains difficult. Microbiological cultures frequently have false-positive and false-negative results. This study investigates whether rapid nanopore sequencing can be used to aid the identification of bacteria causing prosthetic joint infection for more timely identification and treatment. <b>Methods</b>: Nineteen patients who had revision surgery following total joint arthroplasty were included in this study. Of these, 15 patients had an infected joint arthroplasty. All patients had joint fluid aspirated at the time of revision surgery. The DNA was extracted from these fluid aspirates, and rapid nanopore sequencing was performed using the MinION device from Oxford Nanopore Technologies. The sequencing data was trimmed to improve quality and filtered to remove human reads using bioinformatic tools. Genomic sequence classification was performed using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool. The results were filtered by read length and sequence identity score. The European Bone and Joint Infection Society criteria were used as a standard to identify infected and not infected patients. Confusion tables were used to calculate accuracy and F1 score based on this criteria and the nanopore sequencing results. <b>Results</b>: Microbiological cultures and nanopore sequencing had an accuracy of 68% and 74%, respectively. However, combining both results predicted infection accurately in 94% of cases (F1 score 96%). <b>Conclusions</b>: Nanopore sequencing has the potential to aid identification of bacteria causing prosthetic joint infection and may be useful as a supplementary diagnostic tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":54246,"journal":{"name":"Antibiotics-Basel","volume":"14 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12466696/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rapid Nanopore Sequencing to Identify Bacteria Causing Prosthetic Joint Infections.\",\"authors\":\"Hollie Wilkinson, Karina Wright, Helen S McCarthy, Jade Perry, Charlotte Hulme, Niall Steele, Benjamin Burston, Rob Townsend, Paul Cool\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/antibiotics14090879\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> The diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection remains difficult. Microbiological cultures frequently have false-positive and false-negative results. This study investigates whether rapid nanopore sequencing can be used to aid the identification of bacteria causing prosthetic joint infection for more timely identification and treatment. <b>Methods</b>: Nineteen patients who had revision surgery following total joint arthroplasty were included in this study. Of these, 15 patients had an infected joint arthroplasty. All patients had joint fluid aspirated at the time of revision surgery. The DNA was extracted from these fluid aspirates, and rapid nanopore sequencing was performed using the MinION device from Oxford Nanopore Technologies. The sequencing data was trimmed to improve quality and filtered to remove human reads using bioinformatic tools. Genomic sequence classification was performed using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool. The results were filtered by read length and sequence identity score. The European Bone and Joint Infection Society criteria were used as a standard to identify infected and not infected patients. Confusion tables were used to calculate accuracy and F1 score based on this criteria and the nanopore sequencing results. <b>Results</b>: Microbiological cultures and nanopore sequencing had an accuracy of 68% and 74%, respectively. However, combining both results predicted infection accurately in 94% of cases (F1 score 96%). <b>Conclusions</b>: Nanopore sequencing has the potential to aid identification of bacteria causing prosthetic joint infection and may be useful as a supplementary diagnostic tool.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antibiotics-Basel\",\"volume\":\"14 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12466696/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antibiotics-Basel\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14090879\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antibiotics-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14090879","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景/目的:人工关节感染的诊断仍然很困难。微生物培养经常有假阳性和假阴性结果。本研究探讨快速纳米孔测序是否可以用于辅助鉴定引起假体关节感染的细菌,以便更及时地识别和治疗。方法:对19例全关节置换术后行翻修手术的患者进行研究。其中,15例患者有感染的关节置换术。所有患者在翻修手术时均有关节液抽吸。从这些流体中提取DNA,并使用牛津纳米孔技术公司的MinION设备进行快速纳米孔测序。测序数据被修剪以提高质量,并使用生物信息学工具过滤以去除人类reads。使用Basic Local Alignment Search Tool进行基因组序列分类。结果通过读取长度和序列一致性评分进行过滤。采用欧洲骨关节感染学会的标准作为鉴定感染和未感染患者的标准。根据该标准和纳米孔测序结果,使用混淆表计算准确性和F1分数。结果:微生物培养和纳米孔测序的准确度分别为68%和74%。然而,结合两种结果预测感染的准确率为94% (F1评分为96%)。结论:纳米孔测序有可能帮助鉴定引起假体关节感染的细菌,并可能作为一种有用的辅助诊断工具。
Rapid Nanopore Sequencing to Identify Bacteria Causing Prosthetic Joint Infections.
Background/Objectives: The diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection remains difficult. Microbiological cultures frequently have false-positive and false-negative results. This study investigates whether rapid nanopore sequencing can be used to aid the identification of bacteria causing prosthetic joint infection for more timely identification and treatment. Methods: Nineteen patients who had revision surgery following total joint arthroplasty were included in this study. Of these, 15 patients had an infected joint arthroplasty. All patients had joint fluid aspirated at the time of revision surgery. The DNA was extracted from these fluid aspirates, and rapid nanopore sequencing was performed using the MinION device from Oxford Nanopore Technologies. The sequencing data was trimmed to improve quality and filtered to remove human reads using bioinformatic tools. Genomic sequence classification was performed using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool. The results were filtered by read length and sequence identity score. The European Bone and Joint Infection Society criteria were used as a standard to identify infected and not infected patients. Confusion tables were used to calculate accuracy and F1 score based on this criteria and the nanopore sequencing results. Results: Microbiological cultures and nanopore sequencing had an accuracy of 68% and 74%, respectively. However, combining both results predicted infection accurately in 94% of cases (F1 score 96%). Conclusions: Nanopore sequencing has the potential to aid identification of bacteria causing prosthetic joint infection and may be useful as a supplementary diagnostic tool.
Antibiotics-BaselPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
14.60%
发文量
1547
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍:
Antibiotics (ISSN 2079-6382) is an open access, peer reviewed journal on all aspects of antibiotics. Antibiotics is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing the general fields of biochemistry, chemistry, genetics, microbiology and pharmacology. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of papers.