建立和验证快速LC-MS/MS方法定量上皮衬里液中的依拉瓦环素:应用于HAP/VAP患者的前瞻性肺分布研究。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Jingjing He, Jingjing Lin, Xin Li, Nanyang Li, Jianguang Su, Jufang Wu, Jin Hu, Jing Zhang, Xiaofen Liu
{"title":"建立和验证快速LC-MS/MS方法定量上皮衬里液中的依拉瓦环素:应用于HAP/VAP患者的前瞻性肺分布研究。","authors":"Jingjing He, Jingjing Lin, Xin Li, Nanyang Li, Jianguang Su, Jufang Wu, Jin Hu, Jing Zhang, Xiaofen Liu","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics14090957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Eravacycline exhibits potent activity against multidrug-resistant pathogens and holds promise for the management of hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia (HAP/VAP). However, sensitive and robust bioanalytical methods to quantify eravacycline in human pulmonary epithelial lining fluid (ELF) for pharmacokinetic (PK) and pulmonary penetration studies in these infections remain limited. <b>Methodology</b>: A simple, rapid, and sensitive LC-MS/MS method was developed for the quantification of eravacycline in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). Using urea as a volume normalizer, ELF concentrations were calculated from the eravacycline concentrations in BALF. This method was applied in a clinical study evaluating the pulmonary penetration after intravenous infusion in patients with HAP and VAP. <b>Results</b>: The developed LC-MS/MS method exhibited good linearity in the range of 1-200 ng/mL for quantifying eravacycline in BALF. In BALF, intra-day precision ranged from 1.4% to 6.0%, and inter-day precision from 1.6% to 9.9%, with accuracy between 98.0% and 102.4%. Matrix effects were within 97.4% to 107.6% for BALF samples from six different individuals, with extraction recoveries ranging from 103.5% to 107.2%. Stability studies demonstrated that eravacycline remained stable under various conditions, including storage at room temperature, freeze-thaw cycles, long-term (-70 °C) storage, and post-treatment handling. The method was successfully applied to clinical samples from four HAP or VAP patients, with measured eravacycline pulmonary penetration ratios of 4.29, 17.40, 5.22 and 4.70, indicating efficient pulmonary distribution. The measured eravacycline concentrations ranged from 0.0243 to 0.0436 μg/mL in BALF. The corresponding urea-corrected ELF concentrations ranged from 0.570 to 1.617 μg/mL. <b>Conclusions</b>: This study described a detailed and validated method for quantifying eravacycline concentrations in ELF from patients, providing a reliable analytical approach for investigating the pulmonary distribution of eravacycline.</p>","PeriodicalId":54246,"journal":{"name":"Antibiotics-Basel","volume":"14 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12466610/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Validation of a Rapid LC-MS/MS Method for Quantifying Eravacycline in Epithelial Lining Fluid: Application to a Prospective Pulmonary Distribution Study in HAP/VAP Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Jingjing He, Jingjing Lin, Xin Li, Nanyang Li, Jianguang Su, Jufang Wu, Jin Hu, Jing Zhang, Xiaofen Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/antibiotics14090957\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Eravacycline exhibits potent activity against multidrug-resistant pathogens and holds promise for the management of hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia (HAP/VAP). However, sensitive and robust bioanalytical methods to quantify eravacycline in human pulmonary epithelial lining fluid (ELF) for pharmacokinetic (PK) and pulmonary penetration studies in these infections remain limited. <b>Methodology</b>: A simple, rapid, and sensitive LC-MS/MS method was developed for the quantification of eravacycline in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). Using urea as a volume normalizer, ELF concentrations were calculated from the eravacycline concentrations in BALF. This method was applied in a clinical study evaluating the pulmonary penetration after intravenous infusion in patients with HAP and VAP. <b>Results</b>: The developed LC-MS/MS method exhibited good linearity in the range of 1-200 ng/mL for quantifying eravacycline in BALF. In BALF, intra-day precision ranged from 1.4% to 6.0%, and inter-day precision from 1.6% to 9.9%, with accuracy between 98.0% and 102.4%. Matrix effects were within 97.4% to 107.6% for BALF samples from six different individuals, with extraction recoveries ranging from 103.5% to 107.2%. Stability studies demonstrated that eravacycline remained stable under various conditions, including storage at room temperature, freeze-thaw cycles, long-term (-70 °C) storage, and post-treatment handling. The method was successfully applied to clinical samples from four HAP or VAP patients, with measured eravacycline pulmonary penetration ratios of 4.29, 17.40, 5.22 and 4.70, indicating efficient pulmonary distribution. The measured eravacycline concentrations ranged from 0.0243 to 0.0436 μg/mL in BALF. The corresponding urea-corrected ELF concentrations ranged from 0.570 to 1.617 μg/mL. <b>Conclusions</b>: This study described a detailed and validated method for quantifying eravacycline concentrations in ELF from patients, providing a reliable analytical approach for investigating the pulmonary distribution of eravacycline.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antibiotics-Basel\",\"volume\":\"14 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12466610/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antibiotics-Basel\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14090957\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antibiotics-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14090957","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:依拉瓦环素显示出对多药耐药病原体的有效活性,并有望用于医院获得性和呼吸机相关性肺炎(HAP/VAP)的治疗。然而,在这些感染的药代动力学(PK)和肺渗透研究中,用于定量人肺上皮衬里液(ELF)中依瓦环素的灵敏和强大的生物分析方法仍然有限。方法:建立一种简便、快速、灵敏的液相色谱-质谱联用(LC-MS/MS)定量支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)中依瓦环素的方法。用尿素作为体积正规剂,从BALF中依伐环素的浓度计算ELF浓度。将该方法应用于评估HAP和VAP患者静脉输注后肺穿透性的临床研究。结果:所建立的LC-MS/MS方法在1 ~ 200 ng/mL范围内具有良好的线性关系。在BALF中,日内精度为1.4% ~ 6.0%,日内精度为1.6% ~ 9.9%,准确度为98.0% ~ 102.4%。基质效应在97.4% ~ 107.6%之间,提取回收率在103.5% ~ 107.2%之间。稳定性研究表明,依瓦环素在各种条件下保持稳定,包括室温储存、冻融循环、长期(-70°C)储存和后处理处理。该方法成功应用于4例HAP或VAP患者的临床样本,测得依瓦环素肺透入率分别为4.29、17.40、5.22和4.70,肺部分布有效。BALF中依伐环素浓度范围为0.0243 ~ 0.0436 μg/mL。相应的尿素校正ELF浓度范围为0.570 ~ 1.617 μg/mL。结论:本研究描述了一种详细且经过验证的方法来定量患者ELF中依瓦环素的浓度,为研究依瓦环素的肺部分布提供了可靠的分析方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Development and Validation of a Rapid LC-MS/MS Method for Quantifying Eravacycline in Epithelial Lining Fluid: Application to a Prospective Pulmonary Distribution Study in HAP/VAP Patients.

Development and Validation of a Rapid LC-MS/MS Method for Quantifying Eravacycline in Epithelial Lining Fluid: Application to a Prospective Pulmonary Distribution Study in HAP/VAP Patients.

Development and Validation of a Rapid LC-MS/MS Method for Quantifying Eravacycline in Epithelial Lining Fluid: Application to a Prospective Pulmonary Distribution Study in HAP/VAP Patients.

Background: Eravacycline exhibits potent activity against multidrug-resistant pathogens and holds promise for the management of hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia (HAP/VAP). However, sensitive and robust bioanalytical methods to quantify eravacycline in human pulmonary epithelial lining fluid (ELF) for pharmacokinetic (PK) and pulmonary penetration studies in these infections remain limited. Methodology: A simple, rapid, and sensitive LC-MS/MS method was developed for the quantification of eravacycline in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). Using urea as a volume normalizer, ELF concentrations were calculated from the eravacycline concentrations in BALF. This method was applied in a clinical study evaluating the pulmonary penetration after intravenous infusion in patients with HAP and VAP. Results: The developed LC-MS/MS method exhibited good linearity in the range of 1-200 ng/mL for quantifying eravacycline in BALF. In BALF, intra-day precision ranged from 1.4% to 6.0%, and inter-day precision from 1.6% to 9.9%, with accuracy between 98.0% and 102.4%. Matrix effects were within 97.4% to 107.6% for BALF samples from six different individuals, with extraction recoveries ranging from 103.5% to 107.2%. Stability studies demonstrated that eravacycline remained stable under various conditions, including storage at room temperature, freeze-thaw cycles, long-term (-70 °C) storage, and post-treatment handling. The method was successfully applied to clinical samples from four HAP or VAP patients, with measured eravacycline pulmonary penetration ratios of 4.29, 17.40, 5.22 and 4.70, indicating efficient pulmonary distribution. The measured eravacycline concentrations ranged from 0.0243 to 0.0436 μg/mL in BALF. The corresponding urea-corrected ELF concentrations ranged from 0.570 to 1.617 μg/mL. Conclusions: This study described a detailed and validated method for quantifying eravacycline concentrations in ELF from patients, providing a reliable analytical approach for investigating the pulmonary distribution of eravacycline.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Antibiotics-Basel
Antibiotics-Basel Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
14.60%
发文量
1547
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Antibiotics (ISSN 2079-6382) is an open access, peer reviewed journal on all aspects of antibiotics. Antibiotics is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing the general fields of biochemistry, chemistry, genetics, microbiology and pharmacology. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信