远程心理治疗与面对面心理干预对COVID-19期间围产期焦虑和抑郁症状的疗效:以意大利围产期心理护理服务为例

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Beatrice Allegri, Giacomo Deste, Valeria Brenna, Emanuela Saveria Gritti, Linda Confalonieri, Alessandra Puzzini, Irene Corbani, Andrea Zucchetti, Umberto Mazza, Tamara Rabà, Mauro Percudani, Stefano Barlati, Antonio Vita
{"title":"远程心理治疗与面对面心理干预对COVID-19期间围产期焦虑和抑郁症状的疗效:以意大利围产期心理护理服务为例","authors":"Beatrice Allegri, Giacomo Deste, Valeria Brenna, Emanuela Saveria Gritti, Linda Confalonieri, Alessandra Puzzini, Irene Corbani, Andrea Zucchetti, Umberto Mazza, Tamara Rabà, Mauro Percudani, Stefano Barlati, Antonio Vita","doi":"10.3390/brainsci15090963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>COVID-19 has limited pregnant and postpartum women's access to mental health services, leading to the introduction of online interventions.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to compare the effectiveness of telepsychotherapy (i.e., psychotherapy provided through digital technology supporting real-time interactivity in the audio or audiovisual modality) with the one yielded by face-to-face interventions in treating perinatal depression and anxiety and to assess the therapist's perceived alliance in both interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected anamnestic information and obstetrical risk factors for 61 women. We evaluated the effectiveness of face-to-face (N = 31) vs. telepsychotherapy (N = 30) interventions on depressive and anxiety symptoms at baseline (T0) and the end of treatment (T1) using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-Y 1 and 2). We assessed the degree of alliance perceived by therapists with the Working Alliance Inventory (WAI-T).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups showed significant decreases in depressive (EPDS face-to-face: T0 12.65 ± 5.81, T1 5.77 ± 4.63, <i>p</i> < 0.001; EPDS remote: T0 11.93 ± 5.24, T1 5.70 ± 4.46, <i>p</i> < 0.001; effect size: 0.002) and state anxiety (STAI-Y 1 face-to-face: T0 51.19 ± 13.73, T1 40.23 ± 12.86, <i>p</i> < 0.001; STAI-Y 1 remote: T0 51.10 ± 11.29, T1 38.00 ± 10.90, <i>p</i> < 0.001; effect size: 0.007//STAI-Y 2 face-to-face: T0 43.13 ± 12.11, T1 41.03 ± 13.06, <i>p</i> = 0.302; STAI-Y 2 remote: T0 44.20 ± 8.70, T1 39.30 ± 9.58, <i>p</i> = 0.003; effect size: <0.001) symptoms by the end of treatment. Women treated remotely also experienced a significant reduction in trait anxiety at T1 (<i>p</i> = 0.003). We found no significant differences in either symptomatology (EPDS; STAI-Y) between the two interventions at baseline or in the therapist-perceived alliance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Synchronous telepsychotherapy for perinatal depression and anxiety showed comparable treatment response to face-to-face interventions, with both modalities associated with significant symptom reduction and the establishment of a working alliance. These findings support the potential of telepsychotherapy as a valuable alternative when in-person services are not accessible, especially during emergency contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":9095,"journal":{"name":"Brain Sciences","volume":"15 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12467804/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Telepsychotherapy Versus Face-to-Face Psychological Intervention for Perinatal Anxiety and Depressive Symptomatology During COVID-19: The Case of an Italian Perinatal Psychological Care Service.\",\"authors\":\"Beatrice Allegri, Giacomo Deste, Valeria Brenna, Emanuela Saveria Gritti, Linda Confalonieri, Alessandra Puzzini, Irene Corbani, Andrea Zucchetti, Umberto Mazza, Tamara Rabà, Mauro Percudani, Stefano Barlati, Antonio Vita\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/brainsci15090963\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>COVID-19 has limited pregnant and postpartum women's access to mental health services, leading to the introduction of online interventions.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to compare the effectiveness of telepsychotherapy (i.e., psychotherapy provided through digital technology supporting real-time interactivity in the audio or audiovisual modality) with the one yielded by face-to-face interventions in treating perinatal depression and anxiety and to assess the therapist's perceived alliance in both interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected anamnestic information and obstetrical risk factors for 61 women. We evaluated the effectiveness of face-to-face (N = 31) vs. telepsychotherapy (N = 30) interventions on depressive and anxiety symptoms at baseline (T0) and the end of treatment (T1) using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-Y 1 and 2). We assessed the degree of alliance perceived by therapists with the Working Alliance Inventory (WAI-T).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups showed significant decreases in depressive (EPDS face-to-face: T0 12.65 ± 5.81, T1 5.77 ± 4.63, <i>p</i> < 0.001; EPDS remote: T0 11.93 ± 5.24, T1 5.70 ± 4.46, <i>p</i> < 0.001; effect size: 0.002) and state anxiety (STAI-Y 1 face-to-face: T0 51.19 ± 13.73, T1 40.23 ± 12.86, <i>p</i> < 0.001; STAI-Y 1 remote: T0 51.10 ± 11.29, T1 38.00 ± 10.90, <i>p</i> < 0.001; effect size: 0.007//STAI-Y 2 face-to-face: T0 43.13 ± 12.11, T1 41.03 ± 13.06, <i>p</i> = 0.302; STAI-Y 2 remote: T0 44.20 ± 8.70, T1 39.30 ± 9.58, <i>p</i> = 0.003; effect size: <0.001) symptoms by the end of treatment. Women treated remotely also experienced a significant reduction in trait anxiety at T1 (<i>p</i> = 0.003). We found no significant differences in either symptomatology (EPDS; STAI-Y) between the two interventions at baseline or in the therapist-perceived alliance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Synchronous telepsychotherapy for perinatal depression and anxiety showed comparable treatment response to face-to-face interventions, with both modalities associated with significant symptom reduction and the establishment of a working alliance. These findings support the potential of telepsychotherapy as a valuable alternative when in-person services are not accessible, especially during emergency contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain Sciences\",\"volume\":\"15 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12467804/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15090963\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15090963","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:COVID-19限制了孕妇和产后妇女获得精神卫生服务的机会,导致引入了在线干预措施。目的:本研究旨在比较远程心理治疗(即通过支持音频或视听方式实时互动的数字技术提供的心理治疗)与面对面干预治疗围产期抑郁和焦虑的效果,并评估治疗师在两种干预中的感知联盟。方法:收集61例妇女的失忆信息及产科危险因素。我们使用爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(EPDS)和状态-特质焦虑量表(STAI-Y 1和2)评估了面对面(N = 31)和远程心理治疗(N = 30)干预在基线(T0)和治疗结束(T1)时对抑郁和焦虑症状的有效性。我们用工作联盟量表(WAI-T)评估治疗师感知到的联盟程度。结果:两组显示显著降低抑郁(T1环保署面对面:T0 12.65±5.81,5.77±4.63,p < 0.001;环保署远程:T0 11.93±5.24,T1 5.70±4.46,p < 0.001;效应大小:0.002)和状态焦虑(T1 STAI-Y 1面对面:T0 51.19±13.73,40.23±12.86,p < 0.001; STAI-Y 1远程:T0 51.10±11.29,T1 38.00±10.90,p < 0.001;效应大小:0.007 / / STAI-Y 2面对面:T0 43.13±12.11,T1 41.03±13.06,p = 0.302;stay - y2远程:T0 44.20±8.70,T1 39.30±9.58,p = 0.003;效应量:p = 0.003)。我们发现两种干预在基线时或在治疗师感知的联盟中,在症状学(EPDS; STAI-Y)方面没有显著差异。结论:同步远程心理治疗围产期抑郁和焦虑表现出与面对面干预相当的治疗效果,两种方式都与显著的症状减轻和建立工作联盟有关。这些发现表明,在无法获得面对面服务的情况下,特别是在紧急情况下,远程心理治疗可能是一种有价值的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of Telepsychotherapy Versus Face-to-Face Psychological Intervention for Perinatal Anxiety and Depressive Symptomatology During COVID-19: The Case of an Italian Perinatal Psychological Care Service.

Background: COVID-19 has limited pregnant and postpartum women's access to mental health services, leading to the introduction of online interventions.

Objectives: This study aims to compare the effectiveness of telepsychotherapy (i.e., psychotherapy provided through digital technology supporting real-time interactivity in the audio or audiovisual modality) with the one yielded by face-to-face interventions in treating perinatal depression and anxiety and to assess the therapist's perceived alliance in both interventions.

Methods: We collected anamnestic information and obstetrical risk factors for 61 women. We evaluated the effectiveness of face-to-face (N = 31) vs. telepsychotherapy (N = 30) interventions on depressive and anxiety symptoms at baseline (T0) and the end of treatment (T1) using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-Y 1 and 2). We assessed the degree of alliance perceived by therapists with the Working Alliance Inventory (WAI-T).

Results: Both groups showed significant decreases in depressive (EPDS face-to-face: T0 12.65 ± 5.81, T1 5.77 ± 4.63, p < 0.001; EPDS remote: T0 11.93 ± 5.24, T1 5.70 ± 4.46, p < 0.001; effect size: 0.002) and state anxiety (STAI-Y 1 face-to-face: T0 51.19 ± 13.73, T1 40.23 ± 12.86, p < 0.001; STAI-Y 1 remote: T0 51.10 ± 11.29, T1 38.00 ± 10.90, p < 0.001; effect size: 0.007//STAI-Y 2 face-to-face: T0 43.13 ± 12.11, T1 41.03 ± 13.06, p = 0.302; STAI-Y 2 remote: T0 44.20 ± 8.70, T1 39.30 ± 9.58, p = 0.003; effect size: <0.001) symptoms by the end of treatment. Women treated remotely also experienced a significant reduction in trait anxiety at T1 (p = 0.003). We found no significant differences in either symptomatology (EPDS; STAI-Y) between the two interventions at baseline or in the therapist-perceived alliance.

Conclusions: Synchronous telepsychotherapy for perinatal depression and anxiety showed comparable treatment response to face-to-face interventions, with both modalities associated with significant symptom reduction and the establishment of a working alliance. These findings support the potential of telepsychotherapy as a valuable alternative when in-person services are not accessible, especially during emergency contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain Sciences
Brain Sciences Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
1472
审稿时长
18.71 days
期刊介绍: Brain Sciences (ISSN 2076-3425) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes and short communications in the areas of cognitive neuroscience, developmental neuroscience, molecular and cellular neuroscience, neural engineering, neuroimaging, neurolinguistics, neuropathy, systems neuroscience, and theoretical and computational neuroscience. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信