Adaptation of Better Conversations with Primary Progressive Aphasia to Norwegian.

Background/objectives: People with primary progressive aphasia (PPA) and their communication partners report that having conversations becomes more difficult over time. They want speech and language therapy to help them have better conversations. Communication partner training has shown promise as an approach for people with PPA and their communication partners. However, there are currently no communication partner training programs available in Norwegian for people with PPA. The Better Conversations with Primary Progressive Aphasia (BCPPA) is a communication partner training program developed in the UK. In this study, we aimed to culturally adapt the BCPPA to meet the needs of Norwegian people with PPA.

Methods: Guided by adaptation elements identified in a systematic review of frameworks for cultural adaptation, we translated the BCPPA into Norwegian before piloting it with four participant dyads, comprising people with PPA and their communication partners. The translated BCPPA was compared to the original BCPPA to identify adherence with core intervention components. Semi-structured interviews were used to explore the acceptability of the intervention to participant dyads. Outcome data, including Goal Attainment Scaling, coding of conversation behaviours from video samples, the Aphasia Impact Questionnaire, and the Communicative Effectiveness Index, were recorded pre-, post-, and three months after intervention delivery to explore outcomes for Norwegian participant dyads. We used the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Enhanced to document the modifications.

Results: The results indicate high adherence to the core components in the original BCPPA. The pilot demonstrated that the participant dyads found the BCPPA acceptable, but they made some additional suggestions to complete the cultural adaptation further. Despite the progressive nature of PPA, the participant dyads achieved their goals on the Goal Attainment Scaling, and group analysis demonstrated maintenance on the Aphasia Impact Questionnaire and the Communicative Effectiveness Index over the three time points.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that the Norwegian version of the BCPPA was acceptable to the participants with PPA and their communication partner in this study. As the first communication partner training program for people with PPA and their communication partners in Norwegian, the BCPPA has the potential to be a valuable treatment tool to support people affected by PPA to have better conversations.