Elena Rossini, Luca Leonardi, Stefania Morino, Giovanni Antonini, Laura Fionda
{"title":"广泛性重症肌无力治疗的免疫靶点:我们现在的方向是什么?","authors":"Elena Rossini, Luca Leonardi, Stefania Morino, Giovanni Antonini, Laura Fionda","doi":"10.3390/brainsci15090978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) is a heterogeneous autoimmune disorder marked by antibody-mediated disruption of neuromuscular transmission. Despite advancements in immunosuppressive therapies and biologics, a subset of patients remains refractory, necessitating more targeted and personalized treatment strategies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review aims to synthesize current knowledge of the immunopathological mechanisms across gMG subtypes and to explore emerging therapeutic targets tailored to these diverse disease phenotypes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A narrative review was conducted, integrating recent findings from clinical trials, immunogenetic studies, and preclinical research to describe subtype-specific immune mechanisms and corresponding therapeutic innovations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>gMG subtypes-characterized by autoantibody profiles (AChR, MuSK, LRP4, or seronegative), thymic histopathology, and age of onset-demonstrate distinct immunological pathways. Early-onset MG is associated with thymic hyperplasia and Th17-driven inflammation; thymoma-associated MG involves central tolerance breakdown; late-onset MG shows immune senescence and altered T-cell regulation. MuSK- and LRP4-positive MG exhibit unique cytokine and antibody signatures. Novel therapeutic strategies include B cell- and T cell-targeted therapies (e.g., anti-CD19, anti-CD38, JAK inhibitors), cytokine inhibitors (IL-6, IL-17, IL-23), FcRn antagonists, complement inhibitors, and gene- or cell-based therapies such as CAR-T and CAAR-T cells.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The evolving landscape of gMG treatment reflects a shift toward immunopathology-based precision medicine. Better characterization of subtype-specific molecular signatures and immune dysfunctions is essential to guide clinical decision-making and improve outcomes for treatment-refractory patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9095,"journal":{"name":"Brain Sciences","volume":"15 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468546/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immunological Targets in Generalized Myasthenia Gravis Treatment: Where Are We Going Now?\",\"authors\":\"Elena Rossini, Luca Leonardi, Stefania Morino, Giovanni Antonini, Laura Fionda\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/brainsci15090978\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) is a heterogeneous autoimmune disorder marked by antibody-mediated disruption of neuromuscular transmission. Despite advancements in immunosuppressive therapies and biologics, a subset of patients remains refractory, necessitating more targeted and personalized treatment strategies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review aims to synthesize current knowledge of the immunopathological mechanisms across gMG subtypes and to explore emerging therapeutic targets tailored to these diverse disease phenotypes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A narrative review was conducted, integrating recent findings from clinical trials, immunogenetic studies, and preclinical research to describe subtype-specific immune mechanisms and corresponding therapeutic innovations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>gMG subtypes-characterized by autoantibody profiles (AChR, MuSK, LRP4, or seronegative), thymic histopathology, and age of onset-demonstrate distinct immunological pathways. Early-onset MG is associated with thymic hyperplasia and Th17-driven inflammation; thymoma-associated MG involves central tolerance breakdown; late-onset MG shows immune senescence and altered T-cell regulation. MuSK- and LRP4-positive MG exhibit unique cytokine and antibody signatures. Novel therapeutic strategies include B cell- and T cell-targeted therapies (e.g., anti-CD19, anti-CD38, JAK inhibitors), cytokine inhibitors (IL-6, IL-17, IL-23), FcRn antagonists, complement inhibitors, and gene- or cell-based therapies such as CAR-T and CAAR-T cells.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The evolving landscape of gMG treatment reflects a shift toward immunopathology-based precision medicine. Better characterization of subtype-specific molecular signatures and immune dysfunctions is essential to guide clinical decision-making and improve outcomes for treatment-refractory patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain Sciences\",\"volume\":\"15 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468546/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15090978\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15090978","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Immunological Targets in Generalized Myasthenia Gravis Treatment: Where Are We Going Now?
Background: Generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) is a heterogeneous autoimmune disorder marked by antibody-mediated disruption of neuromuscular transmission. Despite advancements in immunosuppressive therapies and biologics, a subset of patients remains refractory, necessitating more targeted and personalized treatment strategies.
Objective: This review aims to synthesize current knowledge of the immunopathological mechanisms across gMG subtypes and to explore emerging therapeutic targets tailored to these diverse disease phenotypes.
Methods: A narrative review was conducted, integrating recent findings from clinical trials, immunogenetic studies, and preclinical research to describe subtype-specific immune mechanisms and corresponding therapeutic innovations.
Results: gMG subtypes-characterized by autoantibody profiles (AChR, MuSK, LRP4, or seronegative), thymic histopathology, and age of onset-demonstrate distinct immunological pathways. Early-onset MG is associated with thymic hyperplasia and Th17-driven inflammation; thymoma-associated MG involves central tolerance breakdown; late-onset MG shows immune senescence and altered T-cell regulation. MuSK- and LRP4-positive MG exhibit unique cytokine and antibody signatures. Novel therapeutic strategies include B cell- and T cell-targeted therapies (e.g., anti-CD19, anti-CD38, JAK inhibitors), cytokine inhibitors (IL-6, IL-17, IL-23), FcRn antagonists, complement inhibitors, and gene- or cell-based therapies such as CAR-T and CAAR-T cells.
Conclusion: The evolving landscape of gMG treatment reflects a shift toward immunopathology-based precision medicine. Better characterization of subtype-specific molecular signatures and immune dysfunctions is essential to guide clinical decision-making and improve outcomes for treatment-refractory patients.
期刊介绍:
Brain Sciences (ISSN 2076-3425) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes and short communications in the areas of cognitive neuroscience, developmental neuroscience, molecular and cellular neuroscience, neural engineering, neuroimaging, neurolinguistics, neuropathy, systems neuroscience, and theoretical and computational neuroscience. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.