神经疾病中NRF2的非亲电激活:非药物策略的治疗前景。

IF 6.6 2区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Chunyan Li, Keren Powell, Luca Giliberto, Christopher LeDoux, Cristina d'Abramo, Daniel Sciubba, Yousef Al Abed
{"title":"神经疾病中NRF2的非亲电激活:非药物策略的治疗前景。","authors":"Chunyan Li, Keren Powell, Luca Giliberto, Christopher LeDoux, Cristina d'Abramo, Daniel Sciubba, Yousef Al Abed","doi":"10.3390/antiox14091047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2) serves as a master transcriptional regulator of cellular antioxidant responses through orchestration of cytoprotective gene expression, establishing its significance as a therapeutic target in cerebral pathophysiology. Classical electrophilic NRF2 activators, despite potent activation potential, exhibit paradoxically reduced therapeutic efficacy relative to single antioxidants, attributable to concurrent oxidative stress generation, glutathione depletion, mitochondrial impairment, and systemic toxicity. Although emerging non-electrophilic pharmacological activators offer therapeutic potential, their utility remains limited by bioavailability and suboptimal potency, underscoring the imperative for innovative therapeutic strategies to harness this cytoprotective pathway. Non-pharmacological interventions, including neuromodulation, physical exercise, and lifestyle modifications, activate NRF2 through non-canonical, non-electrophilic pathways involving protein-protein interaction inhibition, KEAP1 degradation, post-translational and transcriptional modulation, and protein stabilization, though mechanistic characterization remains incomplete. Such interventions utilize multi-mechanistic approaches that synergistically integrate multiple non-electrophilic NRF2 pathways or judiciously combine electrophilic and non-electrophilic mechanisms while mitigating electrophile-induced toxicity. This strategy confers neuroprotective effects without the contraindications characteristic of classical electrophilic activators. This review comprehensively examines the mechanistic underpinnings of non-pharmacological NRF2 modulation, highlighting non-electrophilic activation pathways that bypass the limitations inherent to electrophilic activators. The evidence presented herein positions non-pharmacological interventions as viable therapeutic approaches for achieving non-electrophilic NRF2 activation in the treatment of cerebrovascular and neurodegenerative pathologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":7984,"journal":{"name":"Antioxidants","volume":"14 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12466531/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-Electrophilic Activation of NRF2 in Neurological Disorders: Therapeutic Promise of Non-Pharmacological Strategies.\",\"authors\":\"Chunyan Li, Keren Powell, Luca Giliberto, Christopher LeDoux, Cristina d'Abramo, Daniel Sciubba, Yousef Al Abed\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/antiox14091047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2) serves as a master transcriptional regulator of cellular antioxidant responses through orchestration of cytoprotective gene expression, establishing its significance as a therapeutic target in cerebral pathophysiology. Classical electrophilic NRF2 activators, despite potent activation potential, exhibit paradoxically reduced therapeutic efficacy relative to single antioxidants, attributable to concurrent oxidative stress generation, glutathione depletion, mitochondrial impairment, and systemic toxicity. Although emerging non-electrophilic pharmacological activators offer therapeutic potential, their utility remains limited by bioavailability and suboptimal potency, underscoring the imperative for innovative therapeutic strategies to harness this cytoprotective pathway. Non-pharmacological interventions, including neuromodulation, physical exercise, and lifestyle modifications, activate NRF2 through non-canonical, non-electrophilic pathways involving protein-protein interaction inhibition, KEAP1 degradation, post-translational and transcriptional modulation, and protein stabilization, though mechanistic characterization remains incomplete. Such interventions utilize multi-mechanistic approaches that synergistically integrate multiple non-electrophilic NRF2 pathways or judiciously combine electrophilic and non-electrophilic mechanisms while mitigating electrophile-induced toxicity. This strategy confers neuroprotective effects without the contraindications characteristic of classical electrophilic activators. This review comprehensively examines the mechanistic underpinnings of non-pharmacological NRF2 modulation, highlighting non-electrophilic activation pathways that bypass the limitations inherent to electrophilic activators. The evidence presented herein positions non-pharmacological interventions as viable therapeutic approaches for achieving non-electrophilic NRF2 activation in the treatment of cerebrovascular and neurodegenerative pathologies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antioxidants\",\"volume\":\"14 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12466531/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antioxidants\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox14091047\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antioxidants","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox14091047","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

核因子红细胞2相关因子2 (Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2, NRF2)通过调控细胞保护基因的表达,作为细胞抗氧化反应的主要转录调控因子,在脑病理生理中具有重要的治疗作用。经典的亲电性NRF2激活剂,尽管具有强大的激活潜力,但与单一抗氧化剂相比,其治疗效果却显着降低,这可归因于同时产生的氧化应激、谷胱甘肽耗竭、线粒体损伤和全身毒性。尽管新兴的非亲电性药物激活剂提供了治疗潜力,但它们的效用仍然受到生物利用度和次优效力的限制,强调了利用这种细胞保护途径的创新治疗策略的必要性。非药物干预,包括神经调节、体育锻炼和生活方式改变,通过非规范、非亲电途径激活NRF2,包括蛋白质相互作用抑制、KEAP1降解、翻译后和转录调节以及蛋白质稳定,尽管机制表征尚不完整。这些干预措施利用多机制方法,协同整合多种非亲电性NRF2途径,或明智地将亲电性和非亲电性机制结合起来,同时减轻亲电性诱导的毒性。该策略具有神经保护作用,没有经典亲电激活剂的禁忌症。这篇综述全面研究了非药理学NRF2调节的机制基础,强调了绕过亲电激活剂固有局限性的非亲电激活途径。本文提出的证据表明,在脑血管和神经退行性病变的治疗中,非药物干预是实现非亲电性NRF2激活的可行治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Non-Electrophilic Activation of NRF2 in Neurological Disorders: Therapeutic Promise of Non-Pharmacological Strategies.

Non-Electrophilic Activation of NRF2 in Neurological Disorders: Therapeutic Promise of Non-Pharmacological Strategies.

Non-Electrophilic Activation of NRF2 in Neurological Disorders: Therapeutic Promise of Non-Pharmacological Strategies.

Non-Electrophilic Activation of NRF2 in Neurological Disorders: Therapeutic Promise of Non-Pharmacological Strategies.

Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2) serves as a master transcriptional regulator of cellular antioxidant responses through orchestration of cytoprotective gene expression, establishing its significance as a therapeutic target in cerebral pathophysiology. Classical electrophilic NRF2 activators, despite potent activation potential, exhibit paradoxically reduced therapeutic efficacy relative to single antioxidants, attributable to concurrent oxidative stress generation, glutathione depletion, mitochondrial impairment, and systemic toxicity. Although emerging non-electrophilic pharmacological activators offer therapeutic potential, their utility remains limited by bioavailability and suboptimal potency, underscoring the imperative for innovative therapeutic strategies to harness this cytoprotective pathway. Non-pharmacological interventions, including neuromodulation, physical exercise, and lifestyle modifications, activate NRF2 through non-canonical, non-electrophilic pathways involving protein-protein interaction inhibition, KEAP1 degradation, post-translational and transcriptional modulation, and protein stabilization, though mechanistic characterization remains incomplete. Such interventions utilize multi-mechanistic approaches that synergistically integrate multiple non-electrophilic NRF2 pathways or judiciously combine electrophilic and non-electrophilic mechanisms while mitigating electrophile-induced toxicity. This strategy confers neuroprotective effects without the contraindications characteristic of classical electrophilic activators. This review comprehensively examines the mechanistic underpinnings of non-pharmacological NRF2 modulation, highlighting non-electrophilic activation pathways that bypass the limitations inherent to electrophilic activators. The evidence presented herein positions non-pharmacological interventions as viable therapeutic approaches for achieving non-electrophilic NRF2 activation in the treatment of cerebrovascular and neurodegenerative pathologies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Antioxidants
Antioxidants Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Physiology
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
11.40%
发文量
2123
审稿时长
16.3 days
期刊介绍: Antioxidants (ISSN 2076-3921), provides an advanced forum for studies related to the science and technology of antioxidants. It publishes research papers, reviews and communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation or experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary electronic material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信