命名实体识别综述:从学习方法到建模范例和任务

IF 13.9 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Wei Liang Seow, Iti Chaturvedi, Amber Hogarth, Rui Mao, Erik Cambria
{"title":"命名实体识别综述:从学习方法到建模范例和任务","authors":"Wei Liang Seow,&nbsp;Iti Chaturvedi,&nbsp;Amber Hogarth,&nbsp;Rui Mao,&nbsp;Erik Cambria","doi":"10.1007/s10462-025-11321-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Named Entity Recognition (NER) is commonly used when summarising news articles and legal documents. It can extract the names of politicians or organisations and help determine the aspect of a positive or negative sentiment. Previous surveys have only provided a shallow review of NER with respect to a certain datatype. In contrast, here a much deeper coverage of different approaches is provided. First articles with respect to the learning method are discussed, such as supervised or unsupervised. Next, popular models that combine two or more learning methods are introduced in a bottom-up approach. The most popular NER algorithms are compared on a recently crawled 2024 election dataset from Australia. The effect of different parameters such as number of epochs and learning rate is explored. It is concluded that pre-trained NER models are limited in their ability to model new entities and disambiguate their context. Using the sentiment score together with a state space model over entities in a sentence might help overcome these challenges.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8449,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence Review","volume":"58 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10462-025-11321-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A review of named entity recognition: from learning methods to modelling paradigms and tasks\",\"authors\":\"Wei Liang Seow,&nbsp;Iti Chaturvedi,&nbsp;Amber Hogarth,&nbsp;Rui Mao,&nbsp;Erik Cambria\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10462-025-11321-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Named Entity Recognition (NER) is commonly used when summarising news articles and legal documents. It can extract the names of politicians or organisations and help determine the aspect of a positive or negative sentiment. Previous surveys have only provided a shallow review of NER with respect to a certain datatype. In contrast, here a much deeper coverage of different approaches is provided. First articles with respect to the learning method are discussed, such as supervised or unsupervised. Next, popular models that combine two or more learning methods are introduced in a bottom-up approach. The most popular NER algorithms are compared on a recently crawled 2024 election dataset from Australia. The effect of different parameters such as number of epochs and learning rate is explored. It is concluded that pre-trained NER models are limited in their ability to model new entities and disambiguate their context. Using the sentiment score together with a state space model over entities in a sentence might help overcome these challenges.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Artificial Intelligence Review\",\"volume\":\"58 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10462-025-11321-8.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Artificial Intelligence Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-025-11321-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence Review","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-025-11321-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

命名实体识别(NER)通常用于总结新闻文章和法律文件。它可以提取政治家或组织的名字,并帮助确定积极或消极情绪的方面。以前的调查仅对某一数据类型提供了对NER的肤浅审查。相比之下,这里提供了对不同方法的更深入的覆盖。第一篇文章是关于学习方法的讨论,比如有监督的或无监督的。接下来,以自下而上的方式介绍结合两种或多种学习方法的流行模型。最流行的NER算法在最近从澳大利亚抓取的2024年选举数据集上进行了比较。探讨了不同参数(如epoch数和学习率)对算法的影响。结论是,预训练的NER模型在建模新实体和消除其上下文歧义方面的能力有限。将情感评分与句子中实体的状态空间模型一起使用可能有助于克服这些挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A review of named entity recognition: from learning methods to modelling paradigms and tasks

Named Entity Recognition (NER) is commonly used when summarising news articles and legal documents. It can extract the names of politicians or organisations and help determine the aspect of a positive or negative sentiment. Previous surveys have only provided a shallow review of NER with respect to a certain datatype. In contrast, here a much deeper coverage of different approaches is provided. First articles with respect to the learning method are discussed, such as supervised or unsupervised. Next, popular models that combine two or more learning methods are introduced in a bottom-up approach. The most popular NER algorithms are compared on a recently crawled 2024 election dataset from Australia. The effect of different parameters such as number of epochs and learning rate is explored. It is concluded that pre-trained NER models are limited in their ability to model new entities and disambiguate their context. Using the sentiment score together with a state space model over entities in a sentence might help overcome these challenges.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Artificial Intelligence Review
Artificial Intelligence Review 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Artificial Intelligence Review, a fully open access journal, publishes cutting-edge research in artificial intelligence and cognitive science. It features critical evaluations of applications, techniques, and algorithms, providing a platform for both researchers and application developers. The journal includes refereed survey and tutorial articles, along with reviews and commentary on significant developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信