交通研究中的系统性性别偏见:改变的建议

IF 3.3 Q3 TRANSPORTATION
Arun Ulahannan , Andree Woodcock
{"title":"交通研究中的系统性性别偏见:改变的建议","authors":"Arun Ulahannan ,&nbsp;Andree Woodcock","doi":"10.1016/j.cstp.2025.101619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Gender bias has long shaped transport systems, leading to unsafe, exclusionary, and poorly tailored services for women. While transport outcomes have been widely studied, little attention has been given to the research practices that produce these biased findings. This study provides the first critical examination of how gender imbalance is embedded within transport research practice itself. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 experienced transport researchers from the UK, Australia, and New Zealand, and analysed using a rigorous thematic analysis. Four core themes emerged: research culture, trust in institutions, research methods, and visibility. Together, these reveal how current norms in transport research often disadvantage inclusive practice, whether by prioritising participant numbers over diversity, relying on methods that inadvertently exclude women, or failing to build trust with under-represented groups. The findings demonstrate that systemic change is required: inclusive practices must be supported by institutions, normalised through training and peer-review processes, and incentivised in funding calls. By exposing the cultural and methodological mechanisms through which gender bias is reproduced, this study offers concrete recommendations to improve recruitment, analysis, and dissemination practices. It provides a foundation for reshaping research culture towards more equitable and inclusive transport systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46989,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 101619"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systemic gender bias in transportation research: recommendations for change\",\"authors\":\"Arun Ulahannan ,&nbsp;Andree Woodcock\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cstp.2025.101619\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Gender bias has long shaped transport systems, leading to unsafe, exclusionary, and poorly tailored services for women. While transport outcomes have been widely studied, little attention has been given to the research practices that produce these biased findings. This study provides the first critical examination of how gender imbalance is embedded within transport research practice itself. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 experienced transport researchers from the UK, Australia, and New Zealand, and analysed using a rigorous thematic analysis. Four core themes emerged: research culture, trust in institutions, research methods, and visibility. Together, these reveal how current norms in transport research often disadvantage inclusive practice, whether by prioritising participant numbers over diversity, relying on methods that inadvertently exclude women, or failing to build trust with under-represented groups. The findings demonstrate that systemic change is required: inclusive practices must be supported by institutions, normalised through training and peer-review processes, and incentivised in funding calls. By exposing the cultural and methodological mechanisms through which gender bias is reproduced, this study offers concrete recommendations to improve recruitment, analysis, and dissemination practices. It provides a foundation for reshaping research culture towards more equitable and inclusive transport systems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Case Studies on Transport Policy\",\"volume\":\"22 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101619\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Case Studies on Transport Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X25002561\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X25002561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长期以来,性别偏见一直影响着交通系统,导致不安全的、排斥性的、不适合女性的服务。虽然对运输结果进行了广泛的研究,但很少注意产生这些有偏见的发现的研究实践。这项研究提供了性别失衡如何嵌入交通研究实践本身的第一个关键检查。我们对来自英国、澳大利亚和新西兰的13名经验丰富的交通研究人员进行了半结构化访谈,并使用严格的主题分析进行了分析。出现了四个核心主题:研究文化、对机构的信任、研究方法和可见性。总之,这些揭示了交通研究的现行规范往往不利于包容性实践,无论是通过优先考虑参与者数量而不是多样性,依赖于无意中排除女性的方法,还是未能与代表性不足的群体建立信任。研究结果表明,需要进行系统性变革:包容性实践必须得到机构的支持,通过培训和同行评议过程正常化,并在筹资呼吁中受到激励。通过揭示再现性别偏见的文化和方法机制,本研究为改善招聘、分析和传播实践提供了具体建议。它为重塑研究文化,使其朝着更加公平和包容的交通系统发展奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Systemic gender bias in transportation research: recommendations for change
Gender bias has long shaped transport systems, leading to unsafe, exclusionary, and poorly tailored services for women. While transport outcomes have been widely studied, little attention has been given to the research practices that produce these biased findings. This study provides the first critical examination of how gender imbalance is embedded within transport research practice itself. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 experienced transport researchers from the UK, Australia, and New Zealand, and analysed using a rigorous thematic analysis. Four core themes emerged: research culture, trust in institutions, research methods, and visibility. Together, these reveal how current norms in transport research often disadvantage inclusive practice, whether by prioritising participant numbers over diversity, relying on methods that inadvertently exclude women, or failing to build trust with under-represented groups. The findings demonstrate that systemic change is required: inclusive practices must be supported by institutions, normalised through training and peer-review processes, and incentivised in funding calls. By exposing the cultural and methodological mechanisms through which gender bias is reproduced, this study offers concrete recommendations to improve recruitment, analysis, and dissemination practices. It provides a foundation for reshaping research culture towards more equitable and inclusive transport systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
12.00%
发文量
222
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信