ω-6/ω-3平衡亚麻-花生调合油的共压与分离压氧化稳定性及脂质组学特征比较

IF 4.6 2区 农林科学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED
Ruonan He , Yunfu Liu , Meng Zhou , Changqing Wei , Wenyu Liu , Yu’e Ma , Peng Luo
{"title":"ω-6/ω-3平衡亚麻-花生调合油的共压与分离压氧化稳定性及脂质组学特征比较","authors":"Ruonan He ,&nbsp;Yunfu Liu ,&nbsp;Meng Zhou ,&nbsp;Changqing Wei ,&nbsp;Wenyu Liu ,&nbsp;Yu’e Ma ,&nbsp;Peng Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.jfca.2025.108356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the impact of “blending followed by pressing (Co-Pressing)” technology on the Oxidative Stability and Lipidomic Signatures of fatty acid-balanced flaxseed-peanut blended oils compared to “pressing individually followed by blending (Separate Pressing)” technology. By integrating physicochemical analyses with untargeted lipidomics and multivariate statistical modeling, we systematically evaluated oxidative stability, nutrient retention, and lipidomic profiles with different pressing techniques. Results revealed that co-pressed oils exhibited enhanced oxidative resistance and superior preservation of endogenous antioxidants, including tocopherols and phytosterols, relative to traditionally separate pressing. A prominent manifestation is that, under the premise of balanced fatty acids, the retention rate of total phenols is significantly 5.40 % higher than that in the traditional separate pressing. Via lipidomic analysis of three oil samples, we identified 725 lipids that covered 6 categories and 37 subclasses. Meanwhile, through multivariate statistical analysis, we ultimately identified 12 distinct lipid biomarkers from the 725 lipids detected. Further, we established a preliminary link between these characteristic markers and oxidation markers via Spearman correlation analysis. These findings demonstrate that co-pressing technology significantly improves the quality of blended oils by preserving bioactive components and suppressing oxidation pathways.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15867,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Composition and Analysis","volume":"148 ","pages":"Article 108356"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of co-pressing and separate pressing on the oxidative stability and lipidomic signature of ω-6/ω-3 balanced flaxseed-peanut blended oils\",\"authors\":\"Ruonan He ,&nbsp;Yunfu Liu ,&nbsp;Meng Zhou ,&nbsp;Changqing Wei ,&nbsp;Wenyu Liu ,&nbsp;Yu’e Ma ,&nbsp;Peng Luo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfca.2025.108356\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study investigates the impact of “blending followed by pressing (Co-Pressing)” technology on the Oxidative Stability and Lipidomic Signatures of fatty acid-balanced flaxseed-peanut blended oils compared to “pressing individually followed by blending (Separate Pressing)” technology. By integrating physicochemical analyses with untargeted lipidomics and multivariate statistical modeling, we systematically evaluated oxidative stability, nutrient retention, and lipidomic profiles with different pressing techniques. Results revealed that co-pressed oils exhibited enhanced oxidative resistance and superior preservation of endogenous antioxidants, including tocopherols and phytosterols, relative to traditionally separate pressing. A prominent manifestation is that, under the premise of balanced fatty acids, the retention rate of total phenols is significantly 5.40 % higher than that in the traditional separate pressing. Via lipidomic analysis of three oil samples, we identified 725 lipids that covered 6 categories and 37 subclasses. Meanwhile, through multivariate statistical analysis, we ultimately identified 12 distinct lipid biomarkers from the 725 lipids detected. Further, we established a preliminary link between these characteristic markers and oxidation markers via Spearman correlation analysis. These findings demonstrate that co-pressing technology significantly improves the quality of blended oils by preserving bioactive components and suppressing oxidation pathways.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Food Composition and Analysis\",\"volume\":\"148 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108356\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Food Composition and Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088915752501172X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Composition and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088915752501172X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了“混合后压榨(共压榨)”技术与“单独压榨后混合(单独压榨)”技术相比,对脂肪酸平衡的亚麻籽-花生混合油的氧化稳定性和脂质组学特征的影响。通过将理化分析与非靶向脂质组学和多元统计模型相结合,我们系统地评估了不同压制技术下的氧化稳定性、营养保留和脂质组学特征。结果表明,与传统的单独榨油相比,共榨油具有更强的抗氧化能力和更好的保存内源性抗氧化剂,包括生育酚和植物甾醇。一个突出的表现是,在脂肪酸平衡的前提下,总酚的保留率比传统的分离压榨显著提高5.40 %。通过对三个油样的脂质组学分析,我们确定了725种脂质,涵盖6个类别和37个亚类。同时,通过多元统计分析,我们最终从检测到的725种脂质中鉴定出12种不同的脂质生物标志物。通过Spearman相关分析,初步建立了这些特征标记与氧化标记之间的联系。这些发现表明,共压技术通过保留生物活性成分和抑制氧化途径显著提高了调和油的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of co-pressing and separate pressing on the oxidative stability and lipidomic signature of ω-6/ω-3 balanced flaxseed-peanut blended oils
This study investigates the impact of “blending followed by pressing (Co-Pressing)” technology on the Oxidative Stability and Lipidomic Signatures of fatty acid-balanced flaxseed-peanut blended oils compared to “pressing individually followed by blending (Separate Pressing)” technology. By integrating physicochemical analyses with untargeted lipidomics and multivariate statistical modeling, we systematically evaluated oxidative stability, nutrient retention, and lipidomic profiles with different pressing techniques. Results revealed that co-pressed oils exhibited enhanced oxidative resistance and superior preservation of endogenous antioxidants, including tocopherols and phytosterols, relative to traditionally separate pressing. A prominent manifestation is that, under the premise of balanced fatty acids, the retention rate of total phenols is significantly 5.40 % higher than that in the traditional separate pressing. Via lipidomic analysis of three oil samples, we identified 725 lipids that covered 6 categories and 37 subclasses. Meanwhile, through multivariate statistical analysis, we ultimately identified 12 distinct lipid biomarkers from the 725 lipids detected. Further, we established a preliminary link between these characteristic markers and oxidation markers via Spearman correlation analysis. These findings demonstrate that co-pressing technology significantly improves the quality of blended oils by preserving bioactive components and suppressing oxidation pathways.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Food Composition and Analysis
Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
11.60%
发文量
601
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Food Composition and Analysis publishes manuscripts on scientific aspects of data on the chemical composition of human foods, with particular emphasis on actual data on composition of foods; analytical methods; studies on the manipulation, storage, distribution and use of food composition data; and studies on the statistics, use and distribution of such data and data systems. The Journal''s basis is nutrient composition, with increasing emphasis on bioactive non-nutrient and anti-nutrient components. Papers must provide sufficient description of the food samples, analytical methods, quality control procedures and statistical treatments of the data to permit the end users of the food composition data to evaluate the appropriateness of such data in their projects. The Journal does not publish papers on: microbiological compounds; sensory quality; aromatics/volatiles in food and wine; essential oils; organoleptic characteristics of food; physical properties; or clinical papers and pharmacology-related papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信