加纳北部社会和情感行为测量的因子和文化效度。

IF 1.5 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Autumn Brown, Emily Weiss, Noelle M Suntheimer, Richard Appiah, Elisabetta Aurino, Sharon Wolf
{"title":"加纳北部社会和情感行为测量的因子和文化效度。","authors":"Autumn Brown, Emily Weiss, Noelle M Suntheimer, Richard Appiah, Elisabetta Aurino, Sharon Wolf","doi":"10.1080/10888691.2025.2474975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In a large sample of children in northern Ghana (<i>N</i> = 4,723), we investigated the factorial validity and reliability of the widely used parent-report Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated poor fit for the proposed 5-factor model. Using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, we found a reliable and empirically sound 3-factor solution. The first factor reflected self-regulatory and prosocial behaviors, a factor we termed \"responsibility\" to align with skills valued in the Ghanaian context. The second and third factors represented internalizing and externalizing problem behaviors, respectively. Multiple-group confirmatory factor analyses suggested measurement invariance across gender and age. While evidence of convergent and discriminant validity was mixed, associations with child and household characteristics offer new insights into child development in an understudied context. This study contributes to a conversation around the importance of applying socio-cultural understanding to conceptualizing and measuring social and emotional behaviors across diverse contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":47792,"journal":{"name":"Applied Developmental Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12459755/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factorial and Cultural Validity of a Social and Emotional Behavior Measure in Northern Ghana.\",\"authors\":\"Autumn Brown, Emily Weiss, Noelle M Suntheimer, Richard Appiah, Elisabetta Aurino, Sharon Wolf\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10888691.2025.2474975\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In a large sample of children in northern Ghana (<i>N</i> = 4,723), we investigated the factorial validity and reliability of the widely used parent-report Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated poor fit for the proposed 5-factor model. Using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, we found a reliable and empirically sound 3-factor solution. The first factor reflected self-regulatory and prosocial behaviors, a factor we termed \\\"responsibility\\\" to align with skills valued in the Ghanaian context. The second and third factors represented internalizing and externalizing problem behaviors, respectively. Multiple-group confirmatory factor analyses suggested measurement invariance across gender and age. While evidence of convergent and discriminant validity was mixed, associations with child and household characteristics offer new insights into child development in an understudied context. This study contributes to a conversation around the importance of applying socio-cultural understanding to conceptualizing and measuring social and emotional behaviors across diverse contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Developmental Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12459755/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Developmental Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2025.2474975\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Developmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2025.2474975","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在加纳北部的大量儿童样本中(N = 4,723),我们调查了广泛使用的父母报告优势和困难问卷(SDQ)的析因效度和信度。验证性因子分析表明,所提出的五因素模型拟合性较差。利用探索性和验证性因素分析,我们找到了一个可靠的和经验上健全的三因素解决方案。第一个因素反映了自我调节和亲社会行为,我们称之为“责任”的因素,与加纳环境中所重视的技能相一致。第二个和第三个因素分别代表内化和外化问题行为。多组验证性因子分析表明,性别和年龄之间的测量不变性。虽然趋同效度和区别效度的证据是混合的,但与儿童和家庭特征的关联为在研究不足的背景下研究儿童发展提供了新的见解。这项研究有助于围绕应用社会文化理解来概念化和衡量不同背景下的社会和情感行为的重要性进行对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factorial and Cultural Validity of a Social and Emotional Behavior Measure in Northern Ghana.

In a large sample of children in northern Ghana (N = 4,723), we investigated the factorial validity and reliability of the widely used parent-report Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated poor fit for the proposed 5-factor model. Using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, we found a reliable and empirically sound 3-factor solution. The first factor reflected self-regulatory and prosocial behaviors, a factor we termed "responsibility" to align with skills valued in the Ghanaian context. The second and third factors represented internalizing and externalizing problem behaviors, respectively. Multiple-group confirmatory factor analyses suggested measurement invariance across gender and age. While evidence of convergent and discriminant validity was mixed, associations with child and household characteristics offer new insights into child development in an understudied context. This study contributes to a conversation around the importance of applying socio-cultural understanding to conceptualizing and measuring social and emotional behaviors across diverse contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Developmental Science
Applied Developmental Science PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The focus of this multidisciplinary journal is the synthesis of research and application to promote positive development across the life span and across the globe. The journal publishes research that generates descriptive and explanatory knowledge about dynamic and reciprocal person-environment interactions essential to informed public dialogue, social policy, and preventive and development optimizing interventions. This includes research relevant to the development of individuals and social systems across the life span -- including the wide range of familial, biological, societal, cultural, physical, ecological, political and historical settings of human development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信