自我调节在倒班工作医护人员压力与生活质量之间的中介作用:行为聚类的见解。

IF 2.6 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Mohammed F Salahuddin, Jessica Walker, Ernesto Hernandez Zambrana, Vibhuti Gupta, Kwanghee Jung, Seithikurippu R Pandi-Perumal, Md Dilshad Manzar
{"title":"自我调节在倒班工作医护人员压力与生活质量之间的中介作用:行为聚类的见解。","authors":"Mohammed F Salahuddin, Jessica Walker, Ernesto Hernandez Zambrana, Vibhuti Gupta, Kwanghee Jung, Seithikurippu R Pandi-Perumal, Md Dilshad Manzar","doi":"10.3390/ejihpe15090180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The psychological mechanisms through which occupational stress impacts quality of life remain underexplored in shift-working healthcare professionals, a population exposed to unique stressors such as circadian disruption, high cognitive demands, and irregular work schedules. This study examined whether executive self-regulation mediates the relationship between perceived stress and quality of life in a sample of 82 shift-working healthcare professionals. Participants completed validated self-report measures, including the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-4), Executive Skills Questionnaire-Revised (ESQ-R), and Quality of Life Scale (QOLS). Mediation analysis using 5126 bias-corrected bootstrapped samples revealed that perceived stress significantly predicted self-regulation difficulties, which in turn were associated with diminished quality of life. Self-regulation demonstrated an indirect-only mediation effect in both directions, though the forward path (stress → self-regulation → QOL) showed a stronger effect (indirect effect = -0.79; 95% CI: -1.63, -0.17), compared to the reverse path (QOL → self-regulation → stress; indirect effect = -0.04; 95% CI: -0.08, -0.01). Unsupervised K-means clustering identified three distinct behavioral clusters: resilient, low-strain, and high-strain, providing further support for personalized targeted interventions. These findings highlight self-regulation as a central mechanism through which stress affects quality of life and underscore the need for interventions that strengthen executive functioning in shift-based healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":30631,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education","volume":"15 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468397/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-Regulation Mediates the Relationship Between Stress and Quality of Life in Shift-Working Healthcare Professionals: Behavioral Clustering Insights.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed F Salahuddin, Jessica Walker, Ernesto Hernandez Zambrana, Vibhuti Gupta, Kwanghee Jung, Seithikurippu R Pandi-Perumal, Md Dilshad Manzar\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/ejihpe15090180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The psychological mechanisms through which occupational stress impacts quality of life remain underexplored in shift-working healthcare professionals, a population exposed to unique stressors such as circadian disruption, high cognitive demands, and irregular work schedules. This study examined whether executive self-regulation mediates the relationship between perceived stress and quality of life in a sample of 82 shift-working healthcare professionals. Participants completed validated self-report measures, including the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-4), Executive Skills Questionnaire-Revised (ESQ-R), and Quality of Life Scale (QOLS). Mediation analysis using 5126 bias-corrected bootstrapped samples revealed that perceived stress significantly predicted self-regulation difficulties, which in turn were associated with diminished quality of life. Self-regulation demonstrated an indirect-only mediation effect in both directions, though the forward path (stress → self-regulation → QOL) showed a stronger effect (indirect effect = -0.79; 95% CI: -1.63, -0.17), compared to the reverse path (QOL → self-regulation → stress; indirect effect = -0.04; 95% CI: -0.08, -0.01). Unsupervised K-means clustering identified three distinct behavioral clusters: resilient, low-strain, and high-strain, providing further support for personalized targeted interventions. These findings highlight self-regulation as a central mechanism through which stress affects quality of life and underscore the need for interventions that strengthen executive functioning in shift-based healthcare settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":30631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education\",\"volume\":\"15 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468397/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe15090180\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe15090180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在轮班工作的医疗保健专业人员中,职业压力影响生活质量的心理机制仍未得到充分探索,这些人暴露于独特的压力源,如昼夜节律中断、高认知需求和不规律的工作时间表。本研究考察了执行自我调节是否介导了82名轮班工作的医疗保健专业人员感知压力和生活质量之间的关系。参与者完成了有效的自我报告测量,包括感知压力量表(PSS-4),执行技能问卷-修订(ESQ-R)和生活质量量表(QOLS)。使用5126个偏差校正的自举样本进行的中介分析显示,感知压力显著预测自我调节困难,而自我调节困难反过来又与生活质量下降有关。自我调节在两个方向上都表现出间接的中介作用,但正向路径(压力→自我调节→生活质量)比反向路径(生活质量→自我调节→压力;间接效应= -0.79;95% CI: -1.63, -0.17)更强(间接效应= -0.04;95% CI: -0.08, -0.01)。无监督K-means聚类确定了三种不同的行为聚类:弹性、低应变和高应变,为个性化的针对性干预提供了进一步的支持。这些发现强调了自我调节是压力影响生活质量的核心机制,并强调了在轮班制医疗保健环境中加强执行功能的干预的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Self-Regulation Mediates the Relationship Between Stress and Quality of Life in Shift-Working Healthcare Professionals: Behavioral Clustering Insights.

Self-Regulation Mediates the Relationship Between Stress and Quality of Life in Shift-Working Healthcare Professionals: Behavioral Clustering Insights.

Self-Regulation Mediates the Relationship Between Stress and Quality of Life in Shift-Working Healthcare Professionals: Behavioral Clustering Insights.

Self-Regulation Mediates the Relationship Between Stress and Quality of Life in Shift-Working Healthcare Professionals: Behavioral Clustering Insights.

The psychological mechanisms through which occupational stress impacts quality of life remain underexplored in shift-working healthcare professionals, a population exposed to unique stressors such as circadian disruption, high cognitive demands, and irregular work schedules. This study examined whether executive self-regulation mediates the relationship between perceived stress and quality of life in a sample of 82 shift-working healthcare professionals. Participants completed validated self-report measures, including the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-4), Executive Skills Questionnaire-Revised (ESQ-R), and Quality of Life Scale (QOLS). Mediation analysis using 5126 bias-corrected bootstrapped samples revealed that perceived stress significantly predicted self-regulation difficulties, which in turn were associated with diminished quality of life. Self-regulation demonstrated an indirect-only mediation effect in both directions, though the forward path (stress → self-regulation → QOL) showed a stronger effect (indirect effect = -0.79; 95% CI: -1.63, -0.17), compared to the reverse path (QOL → self-regulation → stress; indirect effect = -0.04; 95% CI: -0.08, -0.01). Unsupervised K-means clustering identified three distinct behavioral clusters: resilient, low-strain, and high-strain, providing further support for personalized targeted interventions. These findings highlight self-regulation as a central mechanism through which stress affects quality of life and underscore the need for interventions that strengthen executive functioning in shift-based healthcare settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
111
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信