Anish Behere, Hedvig Mildner, Irene Peralta Garcia, César Pérez Bucio, Ingrid Lundberg, Begum Horuluoglu, Nils Landegren
{"title":"特发性炎性肌病缺乏对I型、II型和III型干扰素的中和性自身抗体。","authors":"Anish Behere, Hedvig Mildner, Irene Peralta Garcia, César Pérez Bucio, Ingrid Lundberg, Begum Horuluoglu, Nils Landegren","doi":"10.1136/rmdopen-2025-005836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether autoantibodies against interferons are present and play a role in disease modulation in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We screened for autoantibodies against a large number of interferons (IFNs) and other cytokines in a cross-sectional observational cohort of Swedish patients with anti-synthetase syndrome (n=51) and dermatomyositis (n=48), matched together with blood donors (n=100) from general population, using both planar and suspension-based multiplex assays. A single patient with autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome, type-1 (APS-1), known to harbour autoantibodies that neutralise type-I interferons, was included as a reference biological positive. The functional ability of autoantibodies to neutralise type-I interferons was tested in vitro, using an IFN-α/β responsive cell reporter assay.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The initial screening of plasma samples indicated a repertoire of autoantibodies in IIM patients against a number of common myositis-specific and myositis-associated antigens. On screening for autoantibodies against type-I, II or III interferons, we did not find any evidence of anti-IFN autoantibodies being present in any of the IIM patient subgroups or the blood donors from general population. Additionally, none of the tested plasma samples, except the APS-1, exhibited neutralisation of physiological concentration IFN-α2, further confirming a complete lack of functional autoantibodies against IFN-α subtypes in this cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We did not detect neutralising autoantibodies against IFN-α and autoantibodies against other types of IFNs in a Swedish cohort of IIM patients. These findings contrast with the presence of autoantibodies against type-I IFNs in other systemic autoimmune diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus, characterised by type-I IFN overactivation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21396,"journal":{"name":"RMD Open","volume":"11 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12481268/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies lack neutralising autoantibodies to type- I, II and III interferons.\",\"authors\":\"Anish Behere, Hedvig Mildner, Irene Peralta Garcia, César Pérez Bucio, Ingrid Lundberg, Begum Horuluoglu, Nils Landegren\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/rmdopen-2025-005836\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether autoantibodies against interferons are present and play a role in disease modulation in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We screened for autoantibodies against a large number of interferons (IFNs) and other cytokines in a cross-sectional observational cohort of Swedish patients with anti-synthetase syndrome (n=51) and dermatomyositis (n=48), matched together with blood donors (n=100) from general population, using both planar and suspension-based multiplex assays. A single patient with autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome, type-1 (APS-1), known to harbour autoantibodies that neutralise type-I interferons, was included as a reference biological positive. The functional ability of autoantibodies to neutralise type-I interferons was tested in vitro, using an IFN-α/β responsive cell reporter assay.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The initial screening of plasma samples indicated a repertoire of autoantibodies in IIM patients against a number of common myositis-specific and myositis-associated antigens. On screening for autoantibodies against type-I, II or III interferons, we did not find any evidence of anti-IFN autoantibodies being present in any of the IIM patient subgroups or the blood donors from general population. Additionally, none of the tested plasma samples, except the APS-1, exhibited neutralisation of physiological concentration IFN-α2, further confirming a complete lack of functional autoantibodies against IFN-α subtypes in this cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We did not detect neutralising autoantibodies against IFN-α and autoantibodies against other types of IFNs in a Swedish cohort of IIM patients. These findings contrast with the presence of autoantibodies against type-I IFNs in other systemic autoimmune diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus, characterised by type-I IFN overactivation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RMD Open\",\"volume\":\"11 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12481268/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RMD Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2025-005836\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RMD Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2025-005836","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies lack neutralising autoantibodies to type- I, II and III interferons.
Objective: To determine whether autoantibodies against interferons are present and play a role in disease modulation in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs).
Methods: We screened for autoantibodies against a large number of interferons (IFNs) and other cytokines in a cross-sectional observational cohort of Swedish patients with anti-synthetase syndrome (n=51) and dermatomyositis (n=48), matched together with blood donors (n=100) from general population, using both planar and suspension-based multiplex assays. A single patient with autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome, type-1 (APS-1), known to harbour autoantibodies that neutralise type-I interferons, was included as a reference biological positive. The functional ability of autoantibodies to neutralise type-I interferons was tested in vitro, using an IFN-α/β responsive cell reporter assay.
Result: The initial screening of plasma samples indicated a repertoire of autoantibodies in IIM patients against a number of common myositis-specific and myositis-associated antigens. On screening for autoantibodies against type-I, II or III interferons, we did not find any evidence of anti-IFN autoantibodies being present in any of the IIM patient subgroups or the blood donors from general population. Additionally, none of the tested plasma samples, except the APS-1, exhibited neutralisation of physiological concentration IFN-α2, further confirming a complete lack of functional autoantibodies against IFN-α subtypes in this cohort.
Conclusions: We did not detect neutralising autoantibodies against IFN-α and autoantibodies against other types of IFNs in a Swedish cohort of IIM patients. These findings contrast with the presence of autoantibodies against type-I IFNs in other systemic autoimmune diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus, characterised by type-I IFN overactivation.
期刊介绍:
RMD Open publishes high quality peer-reviewed original research covering the full spectrum of musculoskeletal disorders, rheumatism and connective tissue diseases, including osteoporosis, spine and rehabilitation. Clinical and epidemiological research, basic and translational medicine, interesting clinical cases, and smaller studies that add to the literature are all considered.