LUPIN的开发和验证:一种以患者为中心的自我管理工具,用于评估系统性红斑狼疮的疾病活动性和患者报告的结果。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Marc Scherlinger, Jean-Francois Kleinmann, Antonin Folliasson, Marianne Riviere, Sabine Malivoir, Raphaelle Rybak, Jean Sibilia, Zahir Amoura
{"title":"LUPIN的开发和验证:一种以患者为中心的自我管理工具,用于评估系统性红斑狼疮的疾病活动性和患者报告的结果。","authors":"Marc Scherlinger, Jean-Francois Kleinmann, Antonin Folliasson, Marianne Riviere, Sabine Malivoir, Raphaelle Rybak, Jean Sibilia, Zahir Amoura","doi":"10.1136/rmdopen-2025-006106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and validate LUPIN, a self-administered, patient-centred questionnaire codesigned by patients and lupus specialists to assess disease activity and patient-reported outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>LUPIN and the SF-36 questionnaires were distributed across 34 centres in both metropolitan France and overseas territories. Patients completed the questionnaire prior to their consultations. Physicians, blinded to patients' responses, assessed disease activity using SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) and Physician Global Assessment (PhGA). Correlations and discordances between patient and physician assessments were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 444 participants (85% women, mean age 45 years), the most common manifestations included joint (86%) and skin (72%) involvement; 35% had a history of lupus nephritis. While correlations between LUPIN scores and SLEDAI/PhGA were statistically significant but modest (r<0.39), stronger associations were observed with SF-36 domains for fatigue (r=0.65), pain (r=0.65), and physical function (r=0.69). In patients with active SLE (SLEDAI≥4; n=153), the correlation between LUPIN and clinical SLEDAI improved (r=0.53, p<0.0001). Discordances were primarily driven by patient-reported fatigue and pain, unrelated to suspected mechanical or central pain syndromes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LUPIN effectively captures symptom domains that are often under-represented in conventional clinical indices and reflects the lived burden of disease in SLE. It offers a practical, scalable tool to support patient engagement, shared decision-making and individualised disease monitoring. A longitudinal digital study is underway to further assess its value in tracking disease fluctuations over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":21396,"journal":{"name":"RMD Open","volume":"11 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12458825/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of LUPIN: a patient-centred self-administered tool to assess disease activity and patient-reported outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus.\",\"authors\":\"Marc Scherlinger, Jean-Francois Kleinmann, Antonin Folliasson, Marianne Riviere, Sabine Malivoir, Raphaelle Rybak, Jean Sibilia, Zahir Amoura\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/rmdopen-2025-006106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and validate LUPIN, a self-administered, patient-centred questionnaire codesigned by patients and lupus specialists to assess disease activity and patient-reported outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>LUPIN and the SF-36 questionnaires were distributed across 34 centres in both metropolitan France and overseas territories. Patients completed the questionnaire prior to their consultations. Physicians, blinded to patients' responses, assessed disease activity using SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) and Physician Global Assessment (PhGA). Correlations and discordances between patient and physician assessments were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 444 participants (85% women, mean age 45 years), the most common manifestations included joint (86%) and skin (72%) involvement; 35% had a history of lupus nephritis. While correlations between LUPIN scores and SLEDAI/PhGA were statistically significant but modest (r<0.39), stronger associations were observed with SF-36 domains for fatigue (r=0.65), pain (r=0.65), and physical function (r=0.69). In patients with active SLE (SLEDAI≥4; n=153), the correlation between LUPIN and clinical SLEDAI improved (r=0.53, p<0.0001). Discordances were primarily driven by patient-reported fatigue and pain, unrelated to suspected mechanical or central pain syndromes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LUPIN effectively captures symptom domains that are often under-represented in conventional clinical indices and reflects the lived burden of disease in SLE. It offers a practical, scalable tool to support patient engagement, shared decision-making and individualised disease monitoring. A longitudinal digital study is underway to further assess its value in tracking disease fluctuations over time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RMD Open\",\"volume\":\"11 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12458825/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RMD Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2025-006106\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RMD Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2025-006106","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:开发和验证LUPIN,这是一份由患者和狼疮专家共同设计的自我管理的、以患者为中心的问卷,用于评估系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)的疾病活动性和患者报告的结果。方法:在法国大城市和海外领地的34个中心分发了调查问卷和SF-36。患者在会诊前完成问卷调查。医生对患者的反应不知情,使用SLE疾病活动指数2000 (SLEDAI-2K)和医生整体评估(PhGA)评估疾病活动性。分析了患者和医生评估之间的相关性和不一致性。结果:在444名参与者中(85%为女性,平均年龄45岁),最常见的表现包括关节(86%)和皮肤(72%)受累;35%有狼疮肾炎病史。虽然LUPIN评分与SLEDAI/PhGA之间的相关性具有统计学意义,但并不显著(结论:LUPIN有效地捕获了常规临床指标中经常未被充分代表的症状域,并反映了SLE的疾病生活负担。它提供了一种实用的、可扩展的工具,以支持患者参与、共同决策和个性化疾病监测。一项纵向数字研究正在进行中,以进一步评估其在跟踪疾病随时间波动方面的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and validation of LUPIN: a patient-centred self-administered tool to assess disease activity and patient-reported outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Objective: To develop and validate LUPIN, a self-administered, patient-centred questionnaire codesigned by patients and lupus specialists to assess disease activity and patient-reported outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Methods: LUPIN and the SF-36 questionnaires were distributed across 34 centres in both metropolitan France and overseas territories. Patients completed the questionnaire prior to their consultations. Physicians, blinded to patients' responses, assessed disease activity using SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) and Physician Global Assessment (PhGA). Correlations and discordances between patient and physician assessments were analysed.

Results: Among 444 participants (85% women, mean age 45 years), the most common manifestations included joint (86%) and skin (72%) involvement; 35% had a history of lupus nephritis. While correlations between LUPIN scores and SLEDAI/PhGA were statistically significant but modest (r<0.39), stronger associations were observed with SF-36 domains for fatigue (r=0.65), pain (r=0.65), and physical function (r=0.69). In patients with active SLE (SLEDAI≥4; n=153), the correlation between LUPIN and clinical SLEDAI improved (r=0.53, p<0.0001). Discordances were primarily driven by patient-reported fatigue and pain, unrelated to suspected mechanical or central pain syndromes.

Conclusion: LUPIN effectively captures symptom domains that are often under-represented in conventional clinical indices and reflects the lived burden of disease in SLE. It offers a practical, scalable tool to support patient engagement, shared decision-making and individualised disease monitoring. A longitudinal digital study is underway to further assess its value in tracking disease fluctuations over time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
RMD Open
RMD Open RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
6.50%
发文量
205
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: RMD Open publishes high quality peer-reviewed original research covering the full spectrum of musculoskeletal disorders, rheumatism and connective tissue diseases, including osteoporosis, spine and rehabilitation. Clinical and epidemiological research, basic and translational medicine, interesting clinical cases, and smaller studies that add to the literature are all considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信