情绪内容影响视觉工作记忆回忆的保真度。

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Zeinab Haghian, Abdol-Hossein Vahabie, Ehsan Rezayat
{"title":"情绪内容影响视觉工作记忆回忆的保真度。","authors":"Zeinab Haghian, Abdol-Hossein Vahabie, Ehsan Rezayat","doi":"10.1080/02699931.2025.2563056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our working memory (VWM) is susceptible to distortions influenced by various sources. This study investigates how the emotional valence of faces leads to systematic biases in VWM recall. To explore this, we implemented a delayed-reproduction task using a cued recall from a memory set of three faces. Thirty-one participants recalled the emotional valence of a target face, specified by its serial position (1, 2, or 3), by selecting a response from a continuous spectrum of 19 morphed faces. Data were analyzed using Generalized Linear Mixed-Effects Models (GLMMs) to account for trial-to-trial dependencies and individual differences. The findings demonstrate a robust \"diminished intensity\" bias: intensely emotional faces, both happy and sad, were consistently recalled as being more neutral than they were. This central tendency effect was the primary source of recall error. The magnitude of this bias was further modulated by cognitive load (cued serial position) and trial history. Emotional content systematically distorts VWM representations, largely driven by a regression toward the mean. This suggests that fundamental cognitive mechanisms, such as central tendency bias, are key drivers of how emotional information is maintained and recalled, with recall fidelity being shaped by an interplay between stimulus intensity, cognitive load, and temporal dynamics.</p>","PeriodicalId":48412,"journal":{"name":"Cognition & Emotion","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emotional content affects the fidelity of visual working memory recall.\",\"authors\":\"Zeinab Haghian, Abdol-Hossein Vahabie, Ehsan Rezayat\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02699931.2025.2563056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Our working memory (VWM) is susceptible to distortions influenced by various sources. This study investigates how the emotional valence of faces leads to systematic biases in VWM recall. To explore this, we implemented a delayed-reproduction task using a cued recall from a memory set of three faces. Thirty-one participants recalled the emotional valence of a target face, specified by its serial position (1, 2, or 3), by selecting a response from a continuous spectrum of 19 morphed faces. Data were analyzed using Generalized Linear Mixed-Effects Models (GLMMs) to account for trial-to-trial dependencies and individual differences. The findings demonstrate a robust \\\"diminished intensity\\\" bias: intensely emotional faces, both happy and sad, were consistently recalled as being more neutral than they were. This central tendency effect was the primary source of recall error. The magnitude of this bias was further modulated by cognitive load (cued serial position) and trial history. Emotional content systematically distorts VWM representations, largely driven by a regression toward the mean. This suggests that fundamental cognitive mechanisms, such as central tendency bias, are key drivers of how emotional information is maintained and recalled, with recall fidelity being shaped by an interplay between stimulus intensity, cognitive load, and temporal dynamics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48412,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognition & Emotion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognition & Emotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2025.2563056\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition & Emotion","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2025.2563056","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的工作记忆(VWM)容易受到各种来源的扭曲。本研究探讨面孔的情绪效价如何导致VWM记忆中的系统偏差。为了探索这一点,我们使用三张面孔的记忆集的线索回忆实现了一个延迟再现任务。31名参与者通过从连续的19张变形脸的光谱中选择一个反应来回忆目标脸的情绪效价,目标脸由其序列位置(1、2或3)指定。使用广义线性混合效应模型(glmm)分析数据,以解释试验对试验的依赖性和个体差异。研究结果显示了一种强烈的“强度减弱”偏见:情绪强烈的面孔,无论是快乐的还是悲伤的,总是被记忆为比他们更中性。这种集中倾向效应是回忆错误的主要来源。认知负荷(提示序列位置)和试验历史进一步调节了这种偏倚的程度。情绪内容系统地扭曲了VWM表征,主要是由向均值回归驱动的。这表明,基本的认知机制,如集中倾向偏差,是情绪信息如何维持和回忆的关键驱动因素,回忆保真度是由刺激强度、认知负荷和时间动态之间的相互作用形成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Emotional content affects the fidelity of visual working memory recall.

Our working memory (VWM) is susceptible to distortions influenced by various sources. This study investigates how the emotional valence of faces leads to systematic biases in VWM recall. To explore this, we implemented a delayed-reproduction task using a cued recall from a memory set of three faces. Thirty-one participants recalled the emotional valence of a target face, specified by its serial position (1, 2, or 3), by selecting a response from a continuous spectrum of 19 morphed faces. Data were analyzed using Generalized Linear Mixed-Effects Models (GLMMs) to account for trial-to-trial dependencies and individual differences. The findings demonstrate a robust "diminished intensity" bias: intensely emotional faces, both happy and sad, were consistently recalled as being more neutral than they were. This central tendency effect was the primary source of recall error. The magnitude of this bias was further modulated by cognitive load (cued serial position) and trial history. Emotional content systematically distorts VWM representations, largely driven by a regression toward the mean. This suggests that fundamental cognitive mechanisms, such as central tendency bias, are key drivers of how emotional information is maintained and recalled, with recall fidelity being shaped by an interplay between stimulus intensity, cognitive load, and temporal dynamics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cognition & Emotion
Cognition & Emotion PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: Cognition & Emotion is devoted to the study of emotion, especially to those aspects of emotion related to cognitive processes. The journal aims to bring together work on emotion undertaken by researchers in cognitive, social, clinical, and developmental psychology, neuropsychology, and cognitive science. Examples of topics appropriate for the journal include the role of cognitive processes in emotion elicitation, regulation, and expression; the impact of emotion on attention, memory, learning, motivation, judgements, and decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信