Laxmaiah Manchikanti, Massab Bashir Khaira, Amol Soin, Alan D Kaye, Nebojsa Nick Knezevic, Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Mahendra Sanapati, Vivekanand A Manocha, Joshua A Hirsch
{"title":"外周神经刺激治疗慢性疼痛的有效性:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Laxmaiah Manchikanti, Massab Bashir Khaira, Amol Soin, Alan D Kaye, Nebojsa Nick Knezevic, Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Mahendra Sanapati, Vivekanand A Manocha, Joshua A Hirsch","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) has been used for over 50 years to treat chronic pain. Since 2015, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved percutaneously implanted PNS leads and neurostimulators, offering a minimally invasive, non-opioid alternative for managing persistent and refractory chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the current evidence on PNS through a systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on PNS for chronic pain management, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Quality was assessed using Cochrane review criteria for risk of bias and the Interventional Pain Management Techniques - Quality Appraisal of Reliability and Risk of Bias Assessment (IPM-QRB) for randomized therapeutic trials.A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases (1966-February 2025), supplemented by manual searches of bibliographies from relevant review articles. Included studies underwent quality assessment, best evidence synthesis, and grading using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Evidence levels were classified from Level I to Level V.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving significant pain relief and functional improvement (>= 50%) sustained for at least 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The present investigation identified 7 high-quality and 2 moderate-quality RCTs based on Cochrane criteria and 9 moderate-quality trials based on IPM-QRB criteria. Utilizing GRADE criteria, 7 of 9 studies demonstrated moderate evidence and clinical applicability, and 2 of 9 showed low evidence and applicability.Overall, the combined qualitative and quantitative analysis supported a fair (Level III) evidence level, with moderate certainty and moderate strength of recommendation for:Implantable PNS systems following a trial or selective lumbar medial branch stimulation without a trialTemporary PNS therapy for 60 days.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>A key limitation remains the scarcity of high-quality studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The evidence supports a fair (Level III) level of evidence with moderate certainty and recommendation strength, based on qualitative and quantitative analyses and GRADE assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19841,"journal":{"name":"Pain physician","volume":"28 5","pages":"E481-E507"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Peripheral Nerve Stimulation in Managing Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Laxmaiah Manchikanti, Massab Bashir Khaira, Amol Soin, Alan D Kaye, Nebojsa Nick Knezevic, Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Mahendra Sanapati, Vivekanand A Manocha, Joshua A Hirsch\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) has been used for over 50 years to treat chronic pain. Since 2015, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved percutaneously implanted PNS leads and neurostimulators, offering a minimally invasive, non-opioid alternative for managing persistent and refractory chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the current evidence on PNS through a systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on PNS for chronic pain management, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Quality was assessed using Cochrane review criteria for risk of bias and the Interventional Pain Management Techniques - Quality Appraisal of Reliability and Risk of Bias Assessment (IPM-QRB) for randomized therapeutic trials.A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases (1966-February 2025), supplemented by manual searches of bibliographies from relevant review articles. Included studies underwent quality assessment, best evidence synthesis, and grading using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Evidence levels were classified from Level I to Level V.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving significant pain relief and functional improvement (>= 50%) sustained for at least 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The present investigation identified 7 high-quality and 2 moderate-quality RCTs based on Cochrane criteria and 9 moderate-quality trials based on IPM-QRB criteria. Utilizing GRADE criteria, 7 of 9 studies demonstrated moderate evidence and clinical applicability, and 2 of 9 showed low evidence and applicability.Overall, the combined qualitative and quantitative analysis supported a fair (Level III) evidence level, with moderate certainty and moderate strength of recommendation for:Implantable PNS systems following a trial or selective lumbar medial branch stimulation without a trialTemporary PNS therapy for 60 days.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>A key limitation remains the scarcity of high-quality studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The evidence supports a fair (Level III) level of evidence with moderate certainty and recommendation strength, based on qualitative and quantitative analyses and GRADE assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain physician\",\"volume\":\"28 5\",\"pages\":\"E481-E507\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain physician\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain physician","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effectiveness of Peripheral Nerve Stimulation in Managing Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Background: Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) has been used for over 50 years to treat chronic pain. Since 2015, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved percutaneously implanted PNS leads and neurostimulators, offering a minimally invasive, non-opioid alternative for managing persistent and refractory chronic pain.
Objective: To evaluate the current evidence on PNS through a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Study design: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on PNS for chronic pain management, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.
Methods: Quality was assessed using Cochrane review criteria for risk of bias and the Interventional Pain Management Techniques - Quality Appraisal of Reliability and Risk of Bias Assessment (IPM-QRB) for randomized therapeutic trials.A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases (1966-February 2025), supplemented by manual searches of bibliographies from relevant review articles. Included studies underwent quality assessment, best evidence synthesis, and grading using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Evidence levels were classified from Level I to Level V.
Outcome measures: The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving significant pain relief and functional improvement (>= 50%) sustained for at least 12 months.
Results: The present investigation identified 7 high-quality and 2 moderate-quality RCTs based on Cochrane criteria and 9 moderate-quality trials based on IPM-QRB criteria. Utilizing GRADE criteria, 7 of 9 studies demonstrated moderate evidence and clinical applicability, and 2 of 9 showed low evidence and applicability.Overall, the combined qualitative and quantitative analysis supported a fair (Level III) evidence level, with moderate certainty and moderate strength of recommendation for:Implantable PNS systems following a trial or selective lumbar medial branch stimulation without a trialTemporary PNS therapy for 60 days.
Limitations: A key limitation remains the scarcity of high-quality studies.
Conclusion: The evidence supports a fair (Level III) level of evidence with moderate certainty and recommendation strength, based on qualitative and quantitative analyses and GRADE assessment.
期刊介绍:
Pain Physician Journal is the official publication of the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP). The open access journal is published 6 times a year.
Pain Physician Journal is a peer-reviewed, multi-disciplinary, open access journal written by and directed to an audience of interventional pain physicians, clinicians and basic scientists with an interest in interventional pain management and pain medicine.
Pain Physician Journal presents the latest studies, research, and information vital to those in the emerging specialty of interventional pain management – and critical to the people they serve.