弱视的艾宾浩斯错觉扭曲:视觉尺寸加工和眼间整合的障碍。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Changwu Tan, Xi Wang, Tong Liu, Longqian Liu, Alexandre Reynaud
{"title":"弱视的艾宾浩斯错觉扭曲:视觉尺寸加工和眼间整合的障碍。","authors":"Changwu Tan, Xi Wang, Tong Liu, Longqian Liu, Alexandre Reynaud","doi":"10.1167/iovs.66.12.54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The perceived size of an object can be manipulated by its surroundings. In the current study, we wanted to investigate whether amblyopic patients have normal object size perception and how their perception is affected by abnormal interocular interactions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixteen adult amblyopes and 16 controls participated in this experiment. We measured the Ebbinghaus illusion magnitude with large and small inducers under one binocular, two monocular, and four dichoptic viewing configurations. Exploratory factor analysis was used to extract common structures and underlying mechanisms in different conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean Ebbinghaus illusion magnitude in amblyopia was smaller with large inducers (F1,30 = 5.874, P = 0.021) and larger with small inducers (F1,30 = 5.814, P = 0.022) than in controls. For the small-inducer geometry, the interaction effect between groups and viewing configurations (F6,180 = 4.472, P < 0.001) was significant. Compared to the control population, the exploratory factor analysis in amblyopia extracted three more factors mainly accounting for dichoptic viewing configurations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Amblyopes tended to overestimate the object size relative to controls in the Ebbinghaus illusion, thereby amplifying it in the small-inducer geometry and diminishing it in the large-inducer geometry. Our factor analysis revealed a limited interocular transfer of the Ebbinghaus illusion in amblyopia, suggesting a defective mechanism in local binocular integration circuitry.</p>","PeriodicalId":14620,"journal":{"name":"Investigative ophthalmology & visual science","volume":"66 12","pages":"54"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468097/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ebbinghaus Illusion Distortions in Amblyopia: Impairments of Visual Size Processing and Interocular Integration.\",\"authors\":\"Changwu Tan, Xi Wang, Tong Liu, Longqian Liu, Alexandre Reynaud\",\"doi\":\"10.1167/iovs.66.12.54\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The perceived size of an object can be manipulated by its surroundings. In the current study, we wanted to investigate whether amblyopic patients have normal object size perception and how their perception is affected by abnormal interocular interactions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixteen adult amblyopes and 16 controls participated in this experiment. We measured the Ebbinghaus illusion magnitude with large and small inducers under one binocular, two monocular, and four dichoptic viewing configurations. Exploratory factor analysis was used to extract common structures and underlying mechanisms in different conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean Ebbinghaus illusion magnitude in amblyopia was smaller with large inducers (F1,30 = 5.874, P = 0.021) and larger with small inducers (F1,30 = 5.814, P = 0.022) than in controls. For the small-inducer geometry, the interaction effect between groups and viewing configurations (F6,180 = 4.472, P < 0.001) was significant. Compared to the control population, the exploratory factor analysis in amblyopia extracted three more factors mainly accounting for dichoptic viewing configurations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Amblyopes tended to overestimate the object size relative to controls in the Ebbinghaus illusion, thereby amplifying it in the small-inducer geometry and diminishing it in the large-inducer geometry. Our factor analysis revealed a limited interocular transfer of the Ebbinghaus illusion in amblyopia, suggesting a defective mechanism in local binocular integration circuitry.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Investigative ophthalmology & visual science\",\"volume\":\"66 12\",\"pages\":\"54\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468097/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Investigative ophthalmology & visual science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.66.12.54\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative ophthalmology & visual science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.66.12.54","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:物体的感知大小可以被周围环境所操纵。在本研究中,我们想研究弱视患者是否有正常的物体大小感知,以及他们的感知如何受到异常眼间相互作用的影响。方法:16例成年弱肢患者和16例对照组。我们测量了艾宾浩斯错觉星等的大小诱导在一个双筒,两个单筒,和四个双视的观看配置。探索性因子分析提取了不同条件下的常见结构和潜在机制。结果:大诱导剂组弱视的平均艾宾浩斯错觉度数比对照组小(F1,30 = 5.874, P = 0.021),小诱导剂组的平均艾宾浩斯错觉度数比对照组大(F1,30 = 5.814, P = 0.022)。对于小诱导体几何形状,组与观察构型之间的交互效应显著(f6180 = 4.472, P < 0.001)。与对照组相比,弱视探索性因素分析提取了3个主要影响双视视形的因素。结论:在艾宾浩斯错觉中,弱视者倾向于高估物体大小,从而在小诱导体几何中放大物体大小,在大诱导体几何中减小物体大小。我们的因子分析显示,弱视患者的艾宾浩斯错觉存在有限的眼间转移,提示局部双目整合电路存在缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ebbinghaus Illusion Distortions in Amblyopia: Impairments of Visual Size Processing and Interocular Integration.

Purpose: The perceived size of an object can be manipulated by its surroundings. In the current study, we wanted to investigate whether amblyopic patients have normal object size perception and how their perception is affected by abnormal interocular interactions.

Methods: Sixteen adult amblyopes and 16 controls participated in this experiment. We measured the Ebbinghaus illusion magnitude with large and small inducers under one binocular, two monocular, and four dichoptic viewing configurations. Exploratory factor analysis was used to extract common structures and underlying mechanisms in different conditions.

Results: The mean Ebbinghaus illusion magnitude in amblyopia was smaller with large inducers (F1,30 = 5.874, P = 0.021) and larger with small inducers (F1,30 = 5.814, P = 0.022) than in controls. For the small-inducer geometry, the interaction effect between groups and viewing configurations (F6,180 = 4.472, P < 0.001) was significant. Compared to the control population, the exploratory factor analysis in amblyopia extracted three more factors mainly accounting for dichoptic viewing configurations.

Conclusions: Amblyopes tended to overestimate the object size relative to controls in the Ebbinghaus illusion, thereby amplifying it in the small-inducer geometry and diminishing it in the large-inducer geometry. Our factor analysis revealed a limited interocular transfer of the Ebbinghaus illusion in amblyopia, suggesting a defective mechanism in local binocular integration circuitry.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
339
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (IOVS), published as ready online, is a peer-reviewed academic journal of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO). IOVS features original research, mostly pertaining to clinical and laboratory ophthalmology and vision research in general.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信