喂养方式对不健康饮食摄入和体重长度z分数的影响:在不同样本中调查儿童早期甜饮料和零食消费

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Catherine A. Serwatka , Lauren M. Smith , Amy M. Moore , Tarunjot Sethi , Hideko Engel , Amy R. Smith , Kai Ling Kong
{"title":"喂养方式对不健康饮食摄入和体重长度z分数的影响:在不同样本中调查儿童早期甜饮料和零食消费","authors":"Catherine A. Serwatka ,&nbsp;Lauren M. Smith ,&nbsp;Amy M. Moore ,&nbsp;Tarunjot Sethi ,&nbsp;Hideko Engel ,&nbsp;Amy R. Smith ,&nbsp;Kai Ling Kong","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.108319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Parental feeding styles shape children's dietary choices and weight.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To examine the relationships between parental feeding styles, sweet beverages and snack foods intakes, and weight-for-length z-scores (WFLz) in young children.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This cross-sectional analysis included 96 mother-child dyads (mean child age = 14.9 months, SD = 2.6). Mothers completed the Infant Feeding Styles Questionnaire, assessing five styles: responsive, restrictive, pressuring, indulgent, and laissez-faire. Three 24-h dietary recalls were analyzed using the Nutrition Data System for Research. Dietary components were categorized as sweet beverages (e.g., sugar-sweetened beverages, 100 % juice) and snack foods (e.g., cookies, chips). Child height and weight were measured. Multivariable linear regressions examined associations between feeding styles, unhealthy dietary intake, and child WFLz, adjusting for covariates.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Pressuring feeding style was positively associated with mean frequency (β = 0.39, p &lt; 0.001), mean energy (β = 0.34, p = 0.003), and % energy (β = 0.38, p &lt; 0.001) from sweet beverages, but negatively associated with mean frequency (β = -0.24, p = 0.034) and % energy (β = −0.22, p = 0.044) from snack foods. Restrictive feeding style was negatively associated with mean energy (β = −0.24, p = 0.036) and % energy (β = −0.23, p = 0.05) from snack foods. Higher mean frequency (β = 0.38, p = 0.002), mean energy (β = 0.37, p = 0.003), and % energy from sweet beverages (β = 0.35, p = 0.004) were associated with higher child WFLz. The effect of sweet beverages on child WFLz was not mediated by pressuring feeding style.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The contrasting associations of pressuring feeding with sweet beverage and snack consumption highlight the need for nuanced approaches in addressing parental feeding practices to mitigate obesity risk in early childhood.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":"216 ","pages":"Article 108319"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of feeding styles on unhealthy dietary intakes and weight-for-length z-scores: Investigating sweet beverages and snack food consumption during early childhood in a diverse sample\",\"authors\":\"Catherine A. Serwatka ,&nbsp;Lauren M. Smith ,&nbsp;Amy M. Moore ,&nbsp;Tarunjot Sethi ,&nbsp;Hideko Engel ,&nbsp;Amy R. Smith ,&nbsp;Kai Ling Kong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.appet.2025.108319\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Parental feeding styles shape children's dietary choices and weight.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To examine the relationships between parental feeding styles, sweet beverages and snack foods intakes, and weight-for-length z-scores (WFLz) in young children.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This cross-sectional analysis included 96 mother-child dyads (mean child age = 14.9 months, SD = 2.6). Mothers completed the Infant Feeding Styles Questionnaire, assessing five styles: responsive, restrictive, pressuring, indulgent, and laissez-faire. Three 24-h dietary recalls were analyzed using the Nutrition Data System for Research. Dietary components were categorized as sweet beverages (e.g., sugar-sweetened beverages, 100 % juice) and snack foods (e.g., cookies, chips). Child height and weight were measured. Multivariable linear regressions examined associations between feeding styles, unhealthy dietary intake, and child WFLz, adjusting for covariates.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Pressuring feeding style was positively associated with mean frequency (β = 0.39, p &lt; 0.001), mean energy (β = 0.34, p = 0.003), and % energy (β = 0.38, p &lt; 0.001) from sweet beverages, but negatively associated with mean frequency (β = -0.24, p = 0.034) and % energy (β = −0.22, p = 0.044) from snack foods. Restrictive feeding style was negatively associated with mean energy (β = −0.24, p = 0.036) and % energy (β = −0.23, p = 0.05) from snack foods. Higher mean frequency (β = 0.38, p = 0.002), mean energy (β = 0.37, p = 0.003), and % energy from sweet beverages (β = 0.35, p = 0.004) were associated with higher child WFLz. The effect of sweet beverages on child WFLz was not mediated by pressuring feeding style.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The contrasting associations of pressuring feeding with sweet beverage and snack consumption highlight the need for nuanced approaches in addressing parental feeding practices to mitigate obesity risk in early childhood.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Appetite\",\"volume\":\"216 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108319\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Appetite\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666325004726\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666325004726","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:父母的喂养方式影响儿童的饮食选择和体重。目的:探讨父母喂养方式、甜饮料和零食摄入量与幼儿体重长度z分数(WFLz)之间的关系。方法:对96对母子进行横断面分析(平均儿童年龄为14.9个月,SD = 2.6)。母亲们完成了婴儿喂养方式问卷,评估了五种方式:反应型、限制性、压力型、放纵型和自由放任型。使用营养数据研究系统对三个24小时饮食召回进行分析。膳食成分分为甜饮料(如含糖饮料、100%果汁)和零食(如饼干、薯片)。测量儿童身高和体重。多变量线性回归检验了喂养方式、不健康饮食摄入和儿童WFLz之间的关系,并对协变量进行了调整。结果:压力喂养方式与平均频率呈正相关(β=0.39)。结论:压力喂养与甜饮料和零食消费的对比关系突出表明,需要采取细致入微的方法来解决父母的喂养方式,以减轻儿童早期肥胖风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of feeding styles on unhealthy dietary intakes and weight-for-length z-scores: Investigating sweet beverages and snack food consumption during early childhood in a diverse sample

Background

Parental feeding styles shape children's dietary choices and weight.

Objectives

To examine the relationships between parental feeding styles, sweet beverages and snack foods intakes, and weight-for-length z-scores (WFLz) in young children.

Methods

This cross-sectional analysis included 96 mother-child dyads (mean child age = 14.9 months, SD = 2.6). Mothers completed the Infant Feeding Styles Questionnaire, assessing five styles: responsive, restrictive, pressuring, indulgent, and laissez-faire. Three 24-h dietary recalls were analyzed using the Nutrition Data System for Research. Dietary components were categorized as sweet beverages (e.g., sugar-sweetened beverages, 100 % juice) and snack foods (e.g., cookies, chips). Child height and weight were measured. Multivariable linear regressions examined associations between feeding styles, unhealthy dietary intake, and child WFLz, adjusting for covariates.

Results

Pressuring feeding style was positively associated with mean frequency (β = 0.39, p < 0.001), mean energy (β = 0.34, p = 0.003), and % energy (β = 0.38, p < 0.001) from sweet beverages, but negatively associated with mean frequency (β = -0.24, p = 0.034) and % energy (β = −0.22, p = 0.044) from snack foods. Restrictive feeding style was negatively associated with mean energy (β = −0.24, p = 0.036) and % energy (β = −0.23, p = 0.05) from snack foods. Higher mean frequency (β = 0.38, p = 0.002), mean energy (β = 0.37, p = 0.003), and % energy from sweet beverages (β = 0.35, p = 0.004) were associated with higher child WFLz. The effect of sweet beverages on child WFLz was not mediated by pressuring feeding style.

Conclusions

The contrasting associations of pressuring feeding with sweet beverage and snack consumption highlight the need for nuanced approaches in addressing parental feeding practices to mitigate obesity risk in early childhood.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Appetite
Appetite 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
566
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信