Anna Kjerstine Rosenmai , Jisun Paik , Eva Bay Wedebye , Nichlas Davidsen , Cecillie Henriksen , Mikala Melchiors , Terje Svingen
{"title":"工业化学品和药物对维甲酸信号通路的体外破坏。","authors":"Anna Kjerstine Rosenmai , Jisun Paik , Eva Bay Wedebye , Nichlas Davidsen , Cecillie Henriksen , Mikala Melchiors , Terje Svingen","doi":"10.1016/j.taap.2025.117577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Disruption of the retinoid signaling pathway by environmental chemicals is currently not directly assessed in regulatory testing. Although in vitro and in silico methods are available to assess disruption of this modality, more data on the selectivity and in vivo predictivity of specific assays are needed. To address this, we tested twenty-one pesticides and pharmaceuticals for their ability to agonize or antagonize the retinoic acid receptor alpha (RARα) or to inhibit the activity of aldehyde dehydrogenases (ALDH1As). Experimental data was generated using a RARα reporter gene assay and a cell line stably transfected to express two isoforms of ALDH1A for enzyme inhibition assay. The measured output of the latter was synthesized retinoic acid (RA) converted from added retinal. RARα antagonism predictions were obtained from the Danish (Q)SAR Database. Several test compounds acted as RAR agonists, while only a few inhibited ALDH1As, suggesting that the two assays together provide a more comprehensive view of how compounds impact RA signaling. Some substances were active in only one of the in vitro assays, highlighting the importance of including both models to avoid false negatives. No clear pattern was seen to suggest that either endpoint was more predictive of in vivo effects. Collectively, these findings underscore the need to include more assays for detecting different mechanisms of retinoid signal disruption in future testing regimens relying less on in vivo toxicity observation and more on predictive methods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23174,"journal":{"name":"Toxicology and applied pharmacology","volume":"505 ","pages":"Article 117577"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In vitro disruption of the retinoic acid signaling pathway by industrial chemicals and pharmaceuticals\",\"authors\":\"Anna Kjerstine Rosenmai , Jisun Paik , Eva Bay Wedebye , Nichlas Davidsen , Cecillie Henriksen , Mikala Melchiors , Terje Svingen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.taap.2025.117577\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Disruption of the retinoid signaling pathway by environmental chemicals is currently not directly assessed in regulatory testing. Although in vitro and in silico methods are available to assess disruption of this modality, more data on the selectivity and in vivo predictivity of specific assays are needed. To address this, we tested twenty-one pesticides and pharmaceuticals for their ability to agonize or antagonize the retinoic acid receptor alpha (RARα) or to inhibit the activity of aldehyde dehydrogenases (ALDH1As). Experimental data was generated using a RARα reporter gene assay and a cell line stably transfected to express two isoforms of ALDH1A for enzyme inhibition assay. The measured output of the latter was synthesized retinoic acid (RA) converted from added retinal. RARα antagonism predictions were obtained from the Danish (Q)SAR Database. Several test compounds acted as RAR agonists, while only a few inhibited ALDH1As, suggesting that the two assays together provide a more comprehensive view of how compounds impact RA signaling. Some substances were active in only one of the in vitro assays, highlighting the importance of including both models to avoid false negatives. No clear pattern was seen to suggest that either endpoint was more predictive of in vivo effects. Collectively, these findings underscore the need to include more assays for detecting different mechanisms of retinoid signal disruption in future testing regimens relying less on in vivo toxicity observation and more on predictive methods.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Toxicology and applied pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"505 \",\"pages\":\"Article 117577\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Toxicology and applied pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041008X25003539\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicology and applied pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041008X25003539","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
In vitro disruption of the retinoic acid signaling pathway by industrial chemicals and pharmaceuticals
Disruption of the retinoid signaling pathway by environmental chemicals is currently not directly assessed in regulatory testing. Although in vitro and in silico methods are available to assess disruption of this modality, more data on the selectivity and in vivo predictivity of specific assays are needed. To address this, we tested twenty-one pesticides and pharmaceuticals for their ability to agonize or antagonize the retinoic acid receptor alpha (RARα) or to inhibit the activity of aldehyde dehydrogenases (ALDH1As). Experimental data was generated using a RARα reporter gene assay and a cell line stably transfected to express two isoforms of ALDH1A for enzyme inhibition assay. The measured output of the latter was synthesized retinoic acid (RA) converted from added retinal. RARα antagonism predictions were obtained from the Danish (Q)SAR Database. Several test compounds acted as RAR agonists, while only a few inhibited ALDH1As, suggesting that the two assays together provide a more comprehensive view of how compounds impact RA signaling. Some substances were active in only one of the in vitro assays, highlighting the importance of including both models to avoid false negatives. No clear pattern was seen to suggest that either endpoint was more predictive of in vivo effects. Collectively, these findings underscore the need to include more assays for detecting different mechanisms of retinoid signal disruption in future testing regimens relying less on in vivo toxicity observation and more on predictive methods.
期刊介绍:
Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology publishes original scientific research of relevance to animals or humans pertaining to the action of chemicals, drugs, or chemically-defined natural products.
Regular articles address mechanistic approaches to physiological, pharmacologic, biochemical, cellular, or molecular understanding of toxicologic/pathologic lesions and to methods used to describe these responses. Safety Science articles address outstanding state-of-the-art preclinical and human translational characterization of drug and chemical safety employing cutting-edge science. Highly significant Regulatory Safety Science articles will also be considered in this category. Papers concerned with alternatives to the use of experimental animals are encouraged.
Short articles report on high impact studies of broad interest to readers of TAAP that would benefit from rapid publication. These articles should contain no more than a combined total of four figures and tables. Authors should include in their cover letter the justification for consideration of their manuscript as a short article.