{"title":"对“门槛上的领导力:生成人工智能时代的意义、伦理和适应”的修正","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/jls.70020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Haskell, C. (2025). Leadership at the Threshold: <i>Meaning, Ethics, and Adaptation in the Age of Generative AI</i>. <i>Journal of Leadership Studies</i>, 19, e70012. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.70012</p><p>After the publication of the aforementioned article, the following errors were discovered and subsequently corrected as outlined below.</p><p>The sentence “This issue of the <i>Leadership & Organization Development Journal</i> does not treat that shift as neutral.” was incorrect. It has been corrected to “The current symposium does not treat that shift as neutral.”</p><p>In “Signals of the Current Climate,” the following sentence was incorrect: “We live in a climate that prizes performance over reflection—where power performs expertise, and those who challenge epistemic overreach, from women scholars to high-profile critics like Gary Marcus, are told they're rude, too dark, or depressing, while complexity is waved away as an inconvenience.”.</p><p>It has been revised to remove the term “women”: “We live in a climate that prizes performance over reflection—where power performs expertise, and those who challenge epistemic overreach, from scholars to high-profile critics like Gary Marcus, are told they are rude, too dark, or depressing, while complexity is waved away as an inconvenience.”.</p><p>The em dash was replaced with parentheses in the following sentences:</p><p>Their contributions (frameworks, case studies, and provocations) reclaim leadership as an act of care, critique, and cultural memory.</p><p>It identifies the interpretive layers (human, institutional, and algorithmic) that leaders must navigate.</p><p>The “Acknowledgments” section was missing and has now been included:</p>","PeriodicalId":45503,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Leadership Studies","volume":"19 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jls.70020","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correction to “Leadership at the Threshold: MEANING, ETHICS, AND ADAPTATION IN THE AGE OF GENERATIVE AI”\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jls.70020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Haskell, C. (2025). Leadership at the Threshold: <i>Meaning, Ethics, and Adaptation in the Age of Generative AI</i>. <i>Journal of Leadership Studies</i>, 19, e70012. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.70012</p><p>After the publication of the aforementioned article, the following errors were discovered and subsequently corrected as outlined below.</p><p>The sentence “This issue of the <i>Leadership & Organization Development Journal</i> does not treat that shift as neutral.” was incorrect. It has been corrected to “The current symposium does not treat that shift as neutral.”</p><p>In “Signals of the Current Climate,” the following sentence was incorrect: “We live in a climate that prizes performance over reflection—where power performs expertise, and those who challenge epistemic overreach, from women scholars to high-profile critics like Gary Marcus, are told they're rude, too dark, or depressing, while complexity is waved away as an inconvenience.”.</p><p>It has been revised to remove the term “women”: “We live in a climate that prizes performance over reflection—where power performs expertise, and those who challenge epistemic overreach, from scholars to high-profile critics like Gary Marcus, are told they are rude, too dark, or depressing, while complexity is waved away as an inconvenience.”.</p><p>The em dash was replaced with parentheses in the following sentences:</p><p>Their contributions (frameworks, case studies, and provocations) reclaim leadership as an act of care, critique, and cultural memory.</p><p>It identifies the interpretive layers (human, institutional, and algorithmic) that leaders must navigate.</p><p>The “Acknowledgments” section was missing and has now been included:</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Leadership Studies\",\"volume\":\"19 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jls.70020\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Leadership Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jls.70020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Leadership Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jls.70020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
哈斯克尔,C.(2025)。门槛上的领导力:生成式人工智能时代的意义、伦理和适应。《Journal of Leadership Studies》,19,e70012. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.70012After在上述文章发表后,发现了以下错误,并随后进行了如下更正。“本期《领导与组织发展杂志》不认为这种转变是中立的”这句话是不正确的。它已被更正为“目前的研讨会不认为这种转变是中性的。”在《当前气候的信号》中,下面这句话是不正确的:“我们生活在一个重视表现而不是反思的环境中——权力表现出专业知识,而那些挑战认知过度的人,从女性学者到加里·马库斯(Gary Marcus)这样的知名评论家,都被告知他们粗鲁、太黑暗或令人沮丧,而复杂性则被视为一种不便而被抛弃。”书中删除了“女性”一词:“我们生活在一个重视表现而不是反思的环境中——权力代表专业知识,那些挑战认知过度的人,从学者到加里·马库斯(Gary Marcus)这样的知名评论家,都被认为粗鲁、太黑暗或令人沮丧,而复杂性则被视为一种不便而被抛弃。”他们的贡献(框架、案例研究和挑衅)将领导力重新定位为一种关怀、批判和文化记忆的行为。它确定了领导者必须驾驭的解释层(人、机构和算法)。“致谢”部分缺失,现在已包括:
Correction to “Leadership at the Threshold: MEANING, ETHICS, AND ADAPTATION IN THE AGE OF GENERATIVE AI”
Haskell, C. (2025). Leadership at the Threshold: Meaning, Ethics, and Adaptation in the Age of Generative AI. Journal of Leadership Studies, 19, e70012. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.70012
After the publication of the aforementioned article, the following errors were discovered and subsequently corrected as outlined below.
The sentence “This issue of the Leadership & Organization Development Journal does not treat that shift as neutral.” was incorrect. It has been corrected to “The current symposium does not treat that shift as neutral.”
In “Signals of the Current Climate,” the following sentence was incorrect: “We live in a climate that prizes performance over reflection—where power performs expertise, and those who challenge epistemic overreach, from women scholars to high-profile critics like Gary Marcus, are told they're rude, too dark, or depressing, while complexity is waved away as an inconvenience.”.
It has been revised to remove the term “women”: “We live in a climate that prizes performance over reflection—where power performs expertise, and those who challenge epistemic overreach, from scholars to high-profile critics like Gary Marcus, are told they are rude, too dark, or depressing, while complexity is waved away as an inconvenience.”.
The em dash was replaced with parentheses in the following sentences:
Their contributions (frameworks, case studies, and provocations) reclaim leadership as an act of care, critique, and cultural memory.
It identifies the interpretive layers (human, institutional, and algorithmic) that leaders must navigate.
The “Acknowledgments” section was missing and has now been included: