ChatGPT在教育中的应用:从一般系统理论的视角对其现状、局限性和未来方向的系统回顾

IF 3.6 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Hsin-Yu Lee, Yueh-Min Huang, Ting-Ting Wu
{"title":"ChatGPT在教育中的应用:从一般系统理论的视角对其现状、局限性和未来方向的系统回顾","authors":"Hsin-Yu Lee,&nbsp;Yueh-Min Huang,&nbsp;Ting-Ting Wu","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The rapid proliferation of ChatGPT has fuelled expectations of transformative change in education; yet most systematic reviews remain confined to single disciplines or educational levels. Adopting general system theory (GST) and the knowledge-skills-attitudes (KSA) framework, this review offers a more comprehensive perspective on ChatGPT's educational impact. Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched major academic databases for studies published between November 2022 and March 2024, screened them against predefined criteria, and ultimately analysed 92 eligible papers through qualitative content analysis. Findings were mapped onto the five GST elements—subject, information, medium, environment and technology. Research to date is markedly concentrated in higher education (69.7%), with far less work in primary (3.4%) and secondary (13.5%) settings. Nearly half of the studies target STEM subjects (45.6%). The most frequently reported applications are timely feedback (55 occurrences), content generation (20) and personalised learning (15). Positive effects are most evident for knowledge construction (63 occurrences) and skills development (59), whereas attitudinal outcomes receive comparatively little attention (20). Overall, the evidence points to promising—but uneven—educational benefits. Prevailing limitations include small- or medium-scale research designs and the under-representation of primary and secondary contexts. Future work should adopt larger samples, give greater weight to attitudinal dimensions, and strive for a more balanced coverage across all educational levels to realise ChatGPT's full potential in teaching and learning.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"60 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ChatGPT in Education: A Systematic Review of Current Landscape, Limitations and Future Directions Through General System Theory Lens\",\"authors\":\"Hsin-Yu Lee,&nbsp;Yueh-Min Huang,&nbsp;Ting-Ting Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ejed.70262\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>The rapid proliferation of ChatGPT has fuelled expectations of transformative change in education; yet most systematic reviews remain confined to single disciplines or educational levels. Adopting general system theory (GST) and the knowledge-skills-attitudes (KSA) framework, this review offers a more comprehensive perspective on ChatGPT's educational impact. Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched major academic databases for studies published between November 2022 and March 2024, screened them against predefined criteria, and ultimately analysed 92 eligible papers through qualitative content analysis. Findings were mapped onto the five GST elements—subject, information, medium, environment and technology. Research to date is markedly concentrated in higher education (69.7%), with far less work in primary (3.4%) and secondary (13.5%) settings. Nearly half of the studies target STEM subjects (45.6%). The most frequently reported applications are timely feedback (55 occurrences), content generation (20) and personalised learning (15). Positive effects are most evident for knowledge construction (63 occurrences) and skills development (59), whereas attitudinal outcomes receive comparatively little attention (20). Overall, the evidence points to promising—but uneven—educational benefits. Prevailing limitations include small- or medium-scale research designs and the under-representation of primary and secondary contexts. Future work should adopt larger samples, give greater weight to attitudinal dimensions, and strive for a more balanced coverage across all educational levels to realise ChatGPT's full potential in teaching and learning.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Education\",\"volume\":\"60 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.70262\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.70262","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

ChatGPT的迅速普及引发了人们对教育变革的期望;然而,大多数系统评价仍然局限于单一学科或教育水平。本文采用一般系统理论(GST)和知识-技能-态度(KSA)框架,对ChatGPT的教育影响提供了一个更全面的视角。根据PRISMA的指导方针,我们检索了主要学术数据库中发表于2022年11月至2024年3月之间的研究,并根据预定义的标准进行筛选,最终通过定性内容分析分析了92篇符合条件的论文。调查结果被映射到商品及服务税的五个要素-主题,信息,媒介,环境和技术。迄今为止的研究主要集中在高等教育(69.7%),而在小学(3.4%)和中学(13.5%)方面的研究要少得多。近一半的研究针对STEM学科(45.6%)。报告中最常见的应用是及时反馈(55次)、内容生成(20次)和个性化学习(15次)。积极影响在知识构建(63次)和技能发展(59次)方面最为明显,而态度结果受到的关注相对较少(20)。总的来说,证据表明教育的好处是有希望的,但并不均衡。主要的限制包括中小规模的研究设计和初级和次级背景的代表性不足。未来的工作应该采用更大的样本,给予态度维度更大的权重,并努力在所有教育水平上实现更平衡的覆盖,以充分发挥ChatGPT在教学和学习中的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ChatGPT in Education: A Systematic Review of Current Landscape, Limitations and Future Directions Through General System Theory Lens

The rapid proliferation of ChatGPT has fuelled expectations of transformative change in education; yet most systematic reviews remain confined to single disciplines or educational levels. Adopting general system theory (GST) and the knowledge-skills-attitudes (KSA) framework, this review offers a more comprehensive perspective on ChatGPT's educational impact. Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched major academic databases for studies published between November 2022 and March 2024, screened them against predefined criteria, and ultimately analysed 92 eligible papers through qualitative content analysis. Findings were mapped onto the five GST elements—subject, information, medium, environment and technology. Research to date is markedly concentrated in higher education (69.7%), with far less work in primary (3.4%) and secondary (13.5%) settings. Nearly half of the studies target STEM subjects (45.6%). The most frequently reported applications are timely feedback (55 occurrences), content generation (20) and personalised learning (15). Positive effects are most evident for knowledge construction (63 occurrences) and skills development (59), whereas attitudinal outcomes receive comparatively little attention (20). Overall, the evidence points to promising—but uneven—educational benefits. Prevailing limitations include small- or medium-scale research designs and the under-representation of primary and secondary contexts. Future work should adopt larger samples, give greater weight to attitudinal dimensions, and strive for a more balanced coverage across all educational levels to realise ChatGPT's full potential in teaching and learning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Education
European Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The prime aims of the European Journal of Education are: - To examine, compare and assess education policies, trends, reforms and programmes of European countries in an international perspective - To disseminate policy debates and research results to a wide audience of academics, researchers, practitioners and students of education sciences - To contribute to the policy debate at the national and European level by providing European administrators and policy-makers in international organisations, national and local governments with comparative and up-to-date material centred on specific themes of common interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信