Ausberto R. Velasquez Garcia , Adam J. Wentworth , Jennifer M. Oettinger , James S. Fitzsimmons , Jeffrey F. Marsh Jr. , Mark E. Morrey , Shawn W. O'Driscoll
{"title":"桡骨头置换术后假体对准的三维评估技术:技术说明","authors":"Ausberto R. Velasquez Garcia , Adam J. Wentworth , Jennifer M. Oettinger , James S. Fitzsimmons , Jeffrey F. Marsh Jr. , Mark E. Morrey , Shawn W. O'Driscoll","doi":"10.1016/j.medengphy.2025.104413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To present a novel evaluation technique for assessing three-dimensional (3D) prosthesis alignment after radial head arthroplasty (RHA) and to identify potential measurement errors associated with this method.</div></div><div><h3>Materials/Methods</h3><div>Virtual surgical planning of a simulated irreparable fracture of the radial head was performed to select and place optimal implants. Of the six 3D-printed bone models, three were fitted with 3D-printed implants and three with metallic implants. After the procedure, 3D models were derived from 3D scans and dual-energy computed tomography with and without metal artifact reduction. Deviations in rotation and translation from the pre-procedure plan as well as measurement errors were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The technique demonstrated the ability to accurately identify minor deviations in prosthesis alignment post-RHA. Deviations ranged from 0 to 14° in rotation and 0 to 1.3 mm in translation. The method also showed high measurement accuracy against 3D reference models, with mean rotational errors of 0.3–0.5° and translation errors of 0.1–0.3 mm.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This technique provides an accurate and precise method for assessing prosthesis alignment in RHA, with minimal measurement errors. Its potential as a valuable clinical tool has substantial implications in improving preoperative planning and postoperative evaluation. Further validation and advancements in reducing operator dependency are necessary for clinical adoption.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49836,"journal":{"name":"Medical Engineering & Physics","volume":"146 ","pages":"Article 104413"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technique for three-dimensional assessment of prosthesis alignment after radial head arthroplasty: A technical note\",\"authors\":\"Ausberto R. Velasquez Garcia , Adam J. Wentworth , Jennifer M. Oettinger , James S. Fitzsimmons , Jeffrey F. Marsh Jr. , Mark E. Morrey , Shawn W. O'Driscoll\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.medengphy.2025.104413\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To present a novel evaluation technique for assessing three-dimensional (3D) prosthesis alignment after radial head arthroplasty (RHA) and to identify potential measurement errors associated with this method.</div></div><div><h3>Materials/Methods</h3><div>Virtual surgical planning of a simulated irreparable fracture of the radial head was performed to select and place optimal implants. Of the six 3D-printed bone models, three were fitted with 3D-printed implants and three with metallic implants. After the procedure, 3D models were derived from 3D scans and dual-energy computed tomography with and without metal artifact reduction. Deviations in rotation and translation from the pre-procedure plan as well as measurement errors were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The technique demonstrated the ability to accurately identify minor deviations in prosthesis alignment post-RHA. Deviations ranged from 0 to 14° in rotation and 0 to 1.3 mm in translation. The method also showed high measurement accuracy against 3D reference models, with mean rotational errors of 0.3–0.5° and translation errors of 0.1–0.3 mm.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This technique provides an accurate and precise method for assessing prosthesis alignment in RHA, with minimal measurement errors. Its potential as a valuable clinical tool has substantial implications in improving preoperative planning and postoperative evaluation. Further validation and advancements in reducing operator dependency are necessary for clinical adoption.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49836,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Engineering & Physics\",\"volume\":\"146 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104413\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Engineering & Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350453325001328\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Engineering & Physics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350453325001328","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Technique for three-dimensional assessment of prosthesis alignment after radial head arthroplasty: A technical note
Objective
To present a novel evaluation technique for assessing three-dimensional (3D) prosthesis alignment after radial head arthroplasty (RHA) and to identify potential measurement errors associated with this method.
Materials/Methods
Virtual surgical planning of a simulated irreparable fracture of the radial head was performed to select and place optimal implants. Of the six 3D-printed bone models, three were fitted with 3D-printed implants and three with metallic implants. After the procedure, 3D models were derived from 3D scans and dual-energy computed tomography with and without metal artifact reduction. Deviations in rotation and translation from the pre-procedure plan as well as measurement errors were assessed.
Results
The technique demonstrated the ability to accurately identify minor deviations in prosthesis alignment post-RHA. Deviations ranged from 0 to 14° in rotation and 0 to 1.3 mm in translation. The method also showed high measurement accuracy against 3D reference models, with mean rotational errors of 0.3–0.5° and translation errors of 0.1–0.3 mm.
Conclusion
This technique provides an accurate and precise method for assessing prosthesis alignment in RHA, with minimal measurement errors. Its potential as a valuable clinical tool has substantial implications in improving preoperative planning and postoperative evaluation. Further validation and advancements in reducing operator dependency are necessary for clinical adoption.
期刊介绍:
Medical Engineering & Physics provides a forum for the publication of the latest developments in biomedical engineering, and reflects the essential multidisciplinary nature of the subject. The journal publishes in-depth critical reviews, scientific papers and technical notes. Our focus encompasses the application of the basic principles of physics and engineering to the development of medical devices and technology, with the ultimate aim of producing improvements in the quality of health care.Topics covered include biomechanics, biomaterials, mechanobiology, rehabilitation engineering, biomedical signal processing and medical device development. Medical Engineering & Physics aims to keep both engineers and clinicians abreast of the latest applications of technology to health care.