Shon Ferguson , Anna Wallenbeck , Sigrid Agenäs , Helena Hansson
{"title":"动物福利法规对猪肉贸易的影响:来自欧洲国家的证据","authors":"Shon Ferguson , Anna Wallenbeck , Sigrid Agenäs , Helena Hansson","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We analyse the impact of stricter national animal welfare (AW) regulations on imports and exports of pork between 13 European countries during the period 1991–2020, a period in which EU directives and national actions related to AW regulations significantly affected pig farming practices. We exploit the fact that some countries have stronger AW regulations for pigs compared with EU’s regulations and other countries’ regulations. Our analyses utilize a new detailed dataset capturing the dynamics of pig AW regulations over time for several EU member states, taking into account multiple aspects of pig AW that can have significant cost impacts for pork producers. We focus on countries with relatively stringent AW legislation for pigs and countries that are major pork producers. Using panel regression, long-differenced IV, and event study approaches, we find that an increase in the relative stringency of pig AW regulations in a country is associated with a reduction in pork exports. We find mixed evidence suggesting that stricter AW regulations for pigs reduced pork imports. Our results have important implications for other jurisdictions that plan to mandate AW regulations for pigs in the near future.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":"136 ","pages":"Article 102966"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of animal welfare regulations on pork trade: evidence from European countries\",\"authors\":\"Shon Ferguson , Anna Wallenbeck , Sigrid Agenäs , Helena Hansson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102966\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We analyse the impact of stricter national animal welfare (AW) regulations on imports and exports of pork between 13 European countries during the period 1991–2020, a period in which EU directives and national actions related to AW regulations significantly affected pig farming practices. We exploit the fact that some countries have stronger AW regulations for pigs compared with EU’s regulations and other countries’ regulations. Our analyses utilize a new detailed dataset capturing the dynamics of pig AW regulations over time for several EU member states, taking into account multiple aspects of pig AW that can have significant cost impacts for pork producers. We focus on countries with relatively stringent AW legislation for pigs and countries that are major pork producers. Using panel regression, long-differenced IV, and event study approaches, we find that an increase in the relative stringency of pig AW regulations in a country is associated with a reduction in pork exports. We find mixed evidence suggesting that stricter AW regulations for pigs reduced pork imports. Our results have important implications for other jurisdictions that plan to mandate AW regulations for pigs in the near future.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Policy\",\"volume\":\"136 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102966\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030691922500171X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Policy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030691922500171X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The impact of animal welfare regulations on pork trade: evidence from European countries
We analyse the impact of stricter national animal welfare (AW) regulations on imports and exports of pork between 13 European countries during the period 1991–2020, a period in which EU directives and national actions related to AW regulations significantly affected pig farming practices. We exploit the fact that some countries have stronger AW regulations for pigs compared with EU’s regulations and other countries’ regulations. Our analyses utilize a new detailed dataset capturing the dynamics of pig AW regulations over time for several EU member states, taking into account multiple aspects of pig AW that can have significant cost impacts for pork producers. We focus on countries with relatively stringent AW legislation for pigs and countries that are major pork producers. Using panel regression, long-differenced IV, and event study approaches, we find that an increase in the relative stringency of pig AW regulations in a country is associated with a reduction in pork exports. We find mixed evidence suggesting that stricter AW regulations for pigs reduced pork imports. Our results have important implications for other jurisdictions that plan to mandate AW regulations for pigs in the near future.
期刊介绍:
Food Policy is a multidisciplinary journal publishing original research and novel evidence on issues in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of policies for the food sector in developing, transition, and advanced economies.
Our main focus is on the economic and social aspect of food policy, and we prioritize empirical studies informing international food policy debates. Provided that articles make a clear and explicit contribution to food policy debates of international interest, we consider papers from any of the social sciences. Papers from other disciplines (e.g., law) will be considered only if they provide a key policy contribution, and are written in a style which is accessible to a social science readership.