流动注射分光光度法和微波等离子体发射光谱法测定肥料中磷的评价。

IF 1.7
Vitoria Marques Mariano, Jorge Cesar Masini
{"title":"流动注射分光光度法和微波等离子体发射光谱法测定肥料中磷的评价。","authors":"Vitoria Marques Mariano, Jorge Cesar Masini","doi":"10.1093/jaoacint/qsaf085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The growing need to increase the efficiency of routine analyses in quality control laboratories of agricultural fertilizer manufacturers underscores the importance of automating official methods or developing validated alternatives to enhance analytical throughput. Phosphorus, a key nutrient in fertilizers, demands precise and rapid analytical techniques that comply with current regulatory requirements.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate Flow Injection Analysis (FIA) methods with molecular absorption spectrophotometric detection-based on official protocols-and compare them to a more advanced technique, Microwave-Induced Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry (MIP-OES), for the quantification of elemental phosphorus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three methodologies were assessed: molecular absorption spectrophotometry based on the formation of yellow vanadophosphomolybdate, the formation of molybdenum blue, and MIP-OES. These methods were applied to fertilizer samples extracted using water and neutral ammonium citrate (NAC), as prescribed by official procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FIA methods provided a sampling throughput of up to 120 analyses per hour, while MIP-OES enabled up to 240 analyses per hour. Both spectrophotometric methods had limits of quantification (LOQ) near 1.0 mg/L. However, the yellow vanadophosphomolybdate method showed better linearity, up to 40 mg/L, compared to 20 mg/L for the molybdenum blue method. MIP-OES exhibited the highest sensitivity (LOQ < 0.2 mg/L) and the broadest linear range. All methods showed acceptable accuracy and precision when tested with certified reference materials.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FIA systems are advantageous over conventional methods due to their simplicity and low cost, making them suitable for routine laboratory settings. MIP-OES, while requiring greater instrumental investment, offers higher throughput and eliminates the need for reagent preparation.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Considering their respective strengths-FIA for accessibility and MIP-OES for performance-it is recommended that both methods are included as Official Methods of Analysis by the Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture (MAPA) and other international regulatory bodies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of AOAC International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Spectrophotometric Flow Injection and Microwave-Induced Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry Methods for the Quantification of Phosphorus in Fertilizers.\",\"authors\":\"Vitoria Marques Mariano, Jorge Cesar Masini\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jaoacint/qsaf085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The growing need to increase the efficiency of routine analyses in quality control laboratories of agricultural fertilizer manufacturers underscores the importance of automating official methods or developing validated alternatives to enhance analytical throughput. Phosphorus, a key nutrient in fertilizers, demands precise and rapid analytical techniques that comply with current regulatory requirements.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate Flow Injection Analysis (FIA) methods with molecular absorption spectrophotometric detection-based on official protocols-and compare them to a more advanced technique, Microwave-Induced Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry (MIP-OES), for the quantification of elemental phosphorus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three methodologies were assessed: molecular absorption spectrophotometry based on the formation of yellow vanadophosphomolybdate, the formation of molybdenum blue, and MIP-OES. These methods were applied to fertilizer samples extracted using water and neutral ammonium citrate (NAC), as prescribed by official procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FIA methods provided a sampling throughput of up to 120 analyses per hour, while MIP-OES enabled up to 240 analyses per hour. Both spectrophotometric methods had limits of quantification (LOQ) near 1.0 mg/L. However, the yellow vanadophosphomolybdate method showed better linearity, up to 40 mg/L, compared to 20 mg/L for the molybdenum blue method. MIP-OES exhibited the highest sensitivity (LOQ < 0.2 mg/L) and the broadest linear range. All methods showed acceptable accuracy and precision when tested with certified reference materials.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FIA systems are advantageous over conventional methods due to their simplicity and low cost, making them suitable for routine laboratory settings. MIP-OES, while requiring greater instrumental investment, offers higher throughput and eliminates the need for reagent preparation.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Considering their respective strengths-FIA for accessibility and MIP-OES for performance-it is recommended that both methods are included as Official Methods of Analysis by the Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture (MAPA) and other international regulatory bodies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of AOAC International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of AOAC International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoacint/qsaf085\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of AOAC International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoacint/qsaf085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在农业肥料制造商的质量控制实验室中,越来越需要提高常规分析的效率,这强调了将官方方法自动化或开发经过验证的替代方法以提高分析通量的重要性。磷是肥料中的一种关键营养物质,需要符合当前监管要求的精确、快速的分析技术。目的:本研究旨在评价流动注射分析(FIA)分子吸收分光光度法检测方法,并将其与更先进的微波诱导等离子体光学发射光谱法(MIP-OES)进行比较,以定量元素磷。方法:对三种方法进行评价:基于黄色钒磷钼酸盐形成的分子吸收分光光度法、钼蓝形成法和MIP-OES。这些方法适用于用水和中性柠檬酸铵(NAC)提取的肥料样品,按官方程序规定。结果:FIA方法提供了每小时高达120次分析的采样吞吐量,而MIP-OES每小时高达240次分析。两种方法的定量限(LOQ)均接近1.0 mg/L。黄钒磷钼酸盐法与钼蓝法的线性关系为20 mg/L,线性关系为40 mg/L。MIP-OES具有最高的灵敏度(LOQ < 0.2 mg/L)和最宽的线性范围。当用认证的标准物质测试时,所有方法的准确度和精密度均可接受。结论:FIA系统由于其简单和低成本而优于传统方法,使其适合常规实验室设置。MIP-OES,虽然需要更大的仪器投资,提供更高的吞吐量,消除了试剂制备的需要。重点:考虑到它们各自的优势(fia用于可及性,MIP-OES用于性能),建议将这两种方法纳入巴西农业部(MAPA)和其他国际监管机构的官方分析方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Spectrophotometric Flow Injection and Microwave-Induced Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry Methods for the Quantification of Phosphorus in Fertilizers.

Background: The growing need to increase the efficiency of routine analyses in quality control laboratories of agricultural fertilizer manufacturers underscores the importance of automating official methods or developing validated alternatives to enhance analytical throughput. Phosphorus, a key nutrient in fertilizers, demands precise and rapid analytical techniques that comply with current regulatory requirements.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate Flow Injection Analysis (FIA) methods with molecular absorption spectrophotometric detection-based on official protocols-and compare them to a more advanced technique, Microwave-Induced Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry (MIP-OES), for the quantification of elemental phosphorus.

Methods: Three methodologies were assessed: molecular absorption spectrophotometry based on the formation of yellow vanadophosphomolybdate, the formation of molybdenum blue, and MIP-OES. These methods were applied to fertilizer samples extracted using water and neutral ammonium citrate (NAC), as prescribed by official procedures.

Results: FIA methods provided a sampling throughput of up to 120 analyses per hour, while MIP-OES enabled up to 240 analyses per hour. Both spectrophotometric methods had limits of quantification (LOQ) near 1.0 mg/L. However, the yellow vanadophosphomolybdate method showed better linearity, up to 40 mg/L, compared to 20 mg/L for the molybdenum blue method. MIP-OES exhibited the highest sensitivity (LOQ < 0.2 mg/L) and the broadest linear range. All methods showed acceptable accuracy and precision when tested with certified reference materials.

Conclusions: FIA systems are advantageous over conventional methods due to their simplicity and low cost, making them suitable for routine laboratory settings. MIP-OES, while requiring greater instrumental investment, offers higher throughput and eliminates the need for reagent preparation.

Highlights: Considering their respective strengths-FIA for accessibility and MIP-OES for performance-it is recommended that both methods are included as Official Methods of Analysis by the Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture (MAPA) and other international regulatory bodies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信