{"title":"流动注射分光光度法和微波等离子体发射光谱法测定肥料中磷的评价。","authors":"Vitoria Marques Mariano, Jorge Cesar Masini","doi":"10.1093/jaoacint/qsaf085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The growing need to increase the efficiency of routine analyses in quality control laboratories of agricultural fertilizer manufacturers underscores the importance of automating official methods or developing validated alternatives to enhance analytical throughput. Phosphorus, a key nutrient in fertilizers, demands precise and rapid analytical techniques that comply with current regulatory requirements.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate Flow Injection Analysis (FIA) methods with molecular absorption spectrophotometric detection-based on official protocols-and compare them to a more advanced technique, Microwave-Induced Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry (MIP-OES), for the quantification of elemental phosphorus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three methodologies were assessed: molecular absorption spectrophotometry based on the formation of yellow vanadophosphomolybdate, the formation of molybdenum blue, and MIP-OES. These methods were applied to fertilizer samples extracted using water and neutral ammonium citrate (NAC), as prescribed by official procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FIA methods provided a sampling throughput of up to 120 analyses per hour, while MIP-OES enabled up to 240 analyses per hour. Both spectrophotometric methods had limits of quantification (LOQ) near 1.0 mg/L. However, the yellow vanadophosphomolybdate method showed better linearity, up to 40 mg/L, compared to 20 mg/L for the molybdenum blue method. MIP-OES exhibited the highest sensitivity (LOQ < 0.2 mg/L) and the broadest linear range. All methods showed acceptable accuracy and precision when tested with certified reference materials.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FIA systems are advantageous over conventional methods due to their simplicity and low cost, making them suitable for routine laboratory settings. MIP-OES, while requiring greater instrumental investment, offers higher throughput and eliminates the need for reagent preparation.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Considering their respective strengths-FIA for accessibility and MIP-OES for performance-it is recommended that both methods are included as Official Methods of Analysis by the Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture (MAPA) and other international regulatory bodies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of AOAC International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Spectrophotometric Flow Injection and Microwave-Induced Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry Methods for the Quantification of Phosphorus in Fertilizers.\",\"authors\":\"Vitoria Marques Mariano, Jorge Cesar Masini\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jaoacint/qsaf085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The growing need to increase the efficiency of routine analyses in quality control laboratories of agricultural fertilizer manufacturers underscores the importance of automating official methods or developing validated alternatives to enhance analytical throughput. Phosphorus, a key nutrient in fertilizers, demands precise and rapid analytical techniques that comply with current regulatory requirements.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate Flow Injection Analysis (FIA) methods with molecular absorption spectrophotometric detection-based on official protocols-and compare them to a more advanced technique, Microwave-Induced Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry (MIP-OES), for the quantification of elemental phosphorus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three methodologies were assessed: molecular absorption spectrophotometry based on the formation of yellow vanadophosphomolybdate, the formation of molybdenum blue, and MIP-OES. These methods were applied to fertilizer samples extracted using water and neutral ammonium citrate (NAC), as prescribed by official procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FIA methods provided a sampling throughput of up to 120 analyses per hour, while MIP-OES enabled up to 240 analyses per hour. Both spectrophotometric methods had limits of quantification (LOQ) near 1.0 mg/L. However, the yellow vanadophosphomolybdate method showed better linearity, up to 40 mg/L, compared to 20 mg/L for the molybdenum blue method. MIP-OES exhibited the highest sensitivity (LOQ < 0.2 mg/L) and the broadest linear range. All methods showed acceptable accuracy and precision when tested with certified reference materials.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FIA systems are advantageous over conventional methods due to their simplicity and low cost, making them suitable for routine laboratory settings. MIP-OES, while requiring greater instrumental investment, offers higher throughput and eliminates the need for reagent preparation.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Considering their respective strengths-FIA for accessibility and MIP-OES for performance-it is recommended that both methods are included as Official Methods of Analysis by the Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture (MAPA) and other international regulatory bodies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of AOAC International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of AOAC International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoacint/qsaf085\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of AOAC International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoacint/qsaf085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of Spectrophotometric Flow Injection and Microwave-Induced Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry Methods for the Quantification of Phosphorus in Fertilizers.
Background: The growing need to increase the efficiency of routine analyses in quality control laboratories of agricultural fertilizer manufacturers underscores the importance of automating official methods or developing validated alternatives to enhance analytical throughput. Phosphorus, a key nutrient in fertilizers, demands precise and rapid analytical techniques that comply with current regulatory requirements.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate Flow Injection Analysis (FIA) methods with molecular absorption spectrophotometric detection-based on official protocols-and compare them to a more advanced technique, Microwave-Induced Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry (MIP-OES), for the quantification of elemental phosphorus.
Methods: Three methodologies were assessed: molecular absorption spectrophotometry based on the formation of yellow vanadophosphomolybdate, the formation of molybdenum blue, and MIP-OES. These methods were applied to fertilizer samples extracted using water and neutral ammonium citrate (NAC), as prescribed by official procedures.
Results: FIA methods provided a sampling throughput of up to 120 analyses per hour, while MIP-OES enabled up to 240 analyses per hour. Both spectrophotometric methods had limits of quantification (LOQ) near 1.0 mg/L. However, the yellow vanadophosphomolybdate method showed better linearity, up to 40 mg/L, compared to 20 mg/L for the molybdenum blue method. MIP-OES exhibited the highest sensitivity (LOQ < 0.2 mg/L) and the broadest linear range. All methods showed acceptable accuracy and precision when tested with certified reference materials.
Conclusions: FIA systems are advantageous over conventional methods due to their simplicity and low cost, making them suitable for routine laboratory settings. MIP-OES, while requiring greater instrumental investment, offers higher throughput and eliminates the need for reagent preparation.
Highlights: Considering their respective strengths-FIA for accessibility and MIP-OES for performance-it is recommended that both methods are included as Official Methods of Analysis by the Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture (MAPA) and other international regulatory bodies.