训练自我调节促进健康饮食:来自纵向干预研究的证据。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Richard B. Lopez , Kaitlyn M. Werner , Gabriel Traub , Blair Saunders , Danielle Cosme , Wilhelm Hofmann
{"title":"训练自我调节促进健康饮食:来自纵向干预研究的证据。","authors":"Richard B. Lopez ,&nbsp;Kaitlyn M. Werner ,&nbsp;Gabriel Traub ,&nbsp;Blair Saunders ,&nbsp;Danielle Cosme ,&nbsp;Wilhelm Hofmann","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.108310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous theorizing suggests that self-regulatory strategies in the appetitive domain may be variably effective, but few studies have directly examined the causal impact these strategies may have in altering daily eating behaviors. Participants (N = 360) were trained to use one of two classes of regulatory strategies—situation-based strategies or cognitive reappraisal—and were instructed to apply these strategies to either healthy or unhealthy foods. All participants’ eating behaviors were assessed longitudinally: during the first two weeks post-training (short-term effects) and up to two months later (long-term effects). Results partly supported preregistered hypotheses, indicating that training in <em>either</em> strategy (vs. no training) was generally effective in promoting healthy eating—as indexed by greater craving for healthy foods, more resistance to unhealthy foods, and less consumption of unhealthy foods. There were also transfer effects, with training targeting healthy foods leading to greater resistance to <em>un</em>healthy foods over time, while training targeting unhealthy foods resulted in stronger craving and consumption of <em>healthy</em> foods. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of both situational strategies and cognitive reappraisal for influencing healthier eating, highlighting the potential for both immediate and lasting benefits, as well as unexpected transfer effects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":"216 ","pages":"Article 108310"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Training self-regulation to promote healthy eating: Evidence from a longitudinal intervention study\",\"authors\":\"Richard B. Lopez ,&nbsp;Kaitlyn M. Werner ,&nbsp;Gabriel Traub ,&nbsp;Blair Saunders ,&nbsp;Danielle Cosme ,&nbsp;Wilhelm Hofmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.appet.2025.108310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Previous theorizing suggests that self-regulatory strategies in the appetitive domain may be variably effective, but few studies have directly examined the causal impact these strategies may have in altering daily eating behaviors. Participants (N = 360) were trained to use one of two classes of regulatory strategies—situation-based strategies or cognitive reappraisal—and were instructed to apply these strategies to either healthy or unhealthy foods. All participants’ eating behaviors were assessed longitudinally: during the first two weeks post-training (short-term effects) and up to two months later (long-term effects). Results partly supported preregistered hypotheses, indicating that training in <em>either</em> strategy (vs. no training) was generally effective in promoting healthy eating—as indexed by greater craving for healthy foods, more resistance to unhealthy foods, and less consumption of unhealthy foods. There were also transfer effects, with training targeting healthy foods leading to greater resistance to <em>un</em>healthy foods over time, while training targeting unhealthy foods resulted in stronger craving and consumption of <em>healthy</em> foods. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of both situational strategies and cognitive reappraisal for influencing healthier eating, highlighting the potential for both immediate and lasting benefits, as well as unexpected transfer effects.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Appetite\",\"volume\":\"216 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108310\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Appetite\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666325004635\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666325004635","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先前的理论表明,食欲领域的自我调节策略可能不同程度地有效,但很少有研究直接检查这些策略在改变日常饮食行为方面可能产生的因果影响。参与者(N = 360)被训练使用两类调节策略——基于情境的策略或认知重新评估——中的一种,并被指示将这些策略应用于健康或不健康的食品。所有参与者的饮食行为都被纵向评估:在训练后的前两周(短期影响)和两个月后(长期影响)。结果部分支持预先登记的假设,表明训练两种策略(与不训练相比)在促进健康饮食方面通常是有效的——对健康食品的渴望更大,对不健康食品的抵抗力更强,对不健康食品的消费更少。还有转移效应,针对健康食品的训练会导致对不健康食品的更大抵抗力,而针对不健康食品的训练会导致对健康食品的更强烈渴望和消费。这些发现证明了情境策略和认知重新评估在影响健康饮食方面的有效性,强调了即时和持久利益的潜力,以及意想不到的转移效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Training self-regulation to promote healthy eating: Evidence from a longitudinal intervention study
Previous theorizing suggests that self-regulatory strategies in the appetitive domain may be variably effective, but few studies have directly examined the causal impact these strategies may have in altering daily eating behaviors. Participants (N = 360) were trained to use one of two classes of regulatory strategies—situation-based strategies or cognitive reappraisal—and were instructed to apply these strategies to either healthy or unhealthy foods. All participants’ eating behaviors were assessed longitudinally: during the first two weeks post-training (short-term effects) and up to two months later (long-term effects). Results partly supported preregistered hypotheses, indicating that training in either strategy (vs. no training) was generally effective in promoting healthy eating—as indexed by greater craving for healthy foods, more resistance to unhealthy foods, and less consumption of unhealthy foods. There were also transfer effects, with training targeting healthy foods leading to greater resistance to unhealthy foods over time, while training targeting unhealthy foods resulted in stronger craving and consumption of healthy foods. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of both situational strategies and cognitive reappraisal for influencing healthier eating, highlighting the potential for both immediate and lasting benefits, as well as unexpected transfer effects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Appetite
Appetite 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
566
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信