为什么更喜欢全缝合锚?一种新的综合评价方法。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Xucan Lian, Yang Zhao, Yong Huan, Helin Xu, Fei Liu, Yu Li, Yiming Zhu, Chi Xiao
{"title":"为什么更喜欢全缝合锚?一种新的综合评价方法。","authors":"Xucan Lian, Yang Zhao, Yong Huan, Helin Xu, Fei Liu, Yu Li, Yiming Zhu, Chi Xiao","doi":"10.1080/10255842.2025.2558038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>All-suture anchor (ASA) is an emerging suture anchor used to fix soft tissue to bone. Composed entirely of textile material, ASA has the advantage of a small size and less damage to the bone. The purpose of this study was to analyze the mechanism of the pullout process of ASA from bone tissue and to quantitatively compare the extent of damage to cancellous bone by ASA and conventional suture anchors. First, pullout experiments were conducted on ASA in two different synthetic bone blocks to verify the effect of bone density on ASA performance, and the extraction process of ASA in the bone was simulated. In addition, a model of the proximal humerus was created, and different suture anchors were implanted. The damage to cancellous bone caused by the suture anchors was calculated and compared under the same force of 0-150 N and cyclic force of 0-100 N. The results showed that when the force was 150 N, the volume of plastic strain after implantation of conventional suture anchors was 26% larger than that after ASA implantation. The maximum plastic strain after implantation of conventional suture anchors was 1.5 times greater than that after implantation of ASA. Finally, a comprehensive evaluation method of suture anchor performance based on overall stiffness was proposed. According to this evaluation method, the performance of ASA is superior to that of conventional suture anchors.</p>","PeriodicalId":50640,"journal":{"name":"Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why prefer all-suture anchor? A new comprehensive evaluation method.\",\"authors\":\"Xucan Lian, Yang Zhao, Yong Huan, Helin Xu, Fei Liu, Yu Li, Yiming Zhu, Chi Xiao\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10255842.2025.2558038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>All-suture anchor (ASA) is an emerging suture anchor used to fix soft tissue to bone. Composed entirely of textile material, ASA has the advantage of a small size and less damage to the bone. The purpose of this study was to analyze the mechanism of the pullout process of ASA from bone tissue and to quantitatively compare the extent of damage to cancellous bone by ASA and conventional suture anchors. First, pullout experiments were conducted on ASA in two different synthetic bone blocks to verify the effect of bone density on ASA performance, and the extraction process of ASA in the bone was simulated. In addition, a model of the proximal humerus was created, and different suture anchors were implanted. The damage to cancellous bone caused by the suture anchors was calculated and compared under the same force of 0-150 N and cyclic force of 0-100 N. The results showed that when the force was 150 N, the volume of plastic strain after implantation of conventional suture anchors was 26% larger than that after ASA implantation. The maximum plastic strain after implantation of conventional suture anchors was 1.5 times greater than that after implantation of ASA. Finally, a comprehensive evaluation method of suture anchor performance based on overall stiffness was proposed. According to this evaluation method, the performance of ASA is superior to that of conventional suture anchors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2025.2558038\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2025.2558038","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全缝合锚(ASA)是一种新兴的缝合锚,用于将软组织固定在骨上。ASA完全由纺织材料组成,具有体积小、对骨骼损伤小的优点。本研究的目的是分析ASA从骨组织中拔出过程的机制,并定量比较ASA与常规缝合锚钉对松质骨的损伤程度。首先,在两种不同的合成骨块中对ASA进行拔牙实验,验证骨密度对ASA性能的影响,并模拟ASA在骨中的拔牙过程。此外,建立了肱骨近端模型,并植入了不同的缝合锚。计算并比较了在0 ~ 150 N的相同力和0 ~ 100 N的循环力作用下缝合锚钉对松质骨的损伤。结果表明,在150 N的力作用下,常规缝合锚钉植入后的塑性应变体积比ASA植入后大26%。常规缝合锚钉植入后的最大塑性应变是ASA植入后的1.5倍。最后,提出了一种基于整体刚度的缝合锚性能综合评价方法。根据该评价方法,ASA的性能优于常规缝合锚钉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why prefer all-suture anchor? A new comprehensive evaluation method.

All-suture anchor (ASA) is an emerging suture anchor used to fix soft tissue to bone. Composed entirely of textile material, ASA has the advantage of a small size and less damage to the bone. The purpose of this study was to analyze the mechanism of the pullout process of ASA from bone tissue and to quantitatively compare the extent of damage to cancellous bone by ASA and conventional suture anchors. First, pullout experiments were conducted on ASA in two different synthetic bone blocks to verify the effect of bone density on ASA performance, and the extraction process of ASA in the bone was simulated. In addition, a model of the proximal humerus was created, and different suture anchors were implanted. The damage to cancellous bone caused by the suture anchors was calculated and compared under the same force of 0-150 N and cyclic force of 0-100 N. The results showed that when the force was 150 N, the volume of plastic strain after implantation of conventional suture anchors was 26% larger than that after ASA implantation. The maximum plastic strain after implantation of conventional suture anchors was 1.5 times greater than that after implantation of ASA. Finally, a comprehensive evaluation method of suture anchor performance based on overall stiffness was proposed. According to this evaluation method, the performance of ASA is superior to that of conventional suture anchors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
179
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The primary aims of Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering are to provide a means of communicating the advances being made in the areas of biomechanics and biomedical engineering and to stimulate interest in the continually emerging computer based technologies which are being applied in these multidisciplinary subjects. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering will also provide a focus for the importance of integrating the disciplines of engineering with medical technology and clinical expertise. Such integration will have a major impact on health care in the future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信