斯里兰卡和英国在线和面对面医学教育中的权力距离。

IF 5.2 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Amaya Ellawala, Alison Ledger, Harith Wickramasekara
{"title":"斯里兰卡和英国在线和面对面医学教育中的权力距离。","authors":"Amaya Ellawala, Alison Ledger, Harith Wickramasekara","doi":"10.1111/medu.70025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The student-teacher relationship can impact learning - power distance is an integral component of this relationship. This study drew on Hofstede's Model of National Culture to compare UK and Sri Lankan students' and teachers' experiences of power in online and face-to-face learning environments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative, exploratory approach was employed. Fourteen interviews and two focus groups were undertaken with undergraduate medical students and teachers in the two settings, during which participants drew their perceptions of power in both learning environments (online and face-to-face). These rich pictures were analysed using aesthetic analysis alongside participants' interview responses, to explore patterns and construct themes for reporting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Though differences between cultures and learning environments were expected, teachers and students in both countries shared understandings of power distance in the teacher-student relationship and expected the teacher to hold power in both online and face-to-face environments. Teachers expressed a desire to lessen hierarchical relationships and attempted to minimise power differentials when online or face-to-face. Strategies for reducing power distance included addressing students by name, using informal and respectful communication, establishing common ground and showing their 'humane' side.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>To achieve greater partnership with students, it is recommended that educators recognise students' strengths and leverage possibilities within their chosen learning environment to modulate the degree of power distance, promote participation and optimise learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":18370,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Power distance within online and face-to-face medical education in Sri Lanka and the UK.\",\"authors\":\"Amaya Ellawala, Alison Ledger, Harith Wickramasekara\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/medu.70025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The student-teacher relationship can impact learning - power distance is an integral component of this relationship. This study drew on Hofstede's Model of National Culture to compare UK and Sri Lankan students' and teachers' experiences of power in online and face-to-face learning environments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative, exploratory approach was employed. Fourteen interviews and two focus groups were undertaken with undergraduate medical students and teachers in the two settings, during which participants drew their perceptions of power in both learning environments (online and face-to-face). These rich pictures were analysed using aesthetic analysis alongside participants' interview responses, to explore patterns and construct themes for reporting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Though differences between cultures and learning environments were expected, teachers and students in both countries shared understandings of power distance in the teacher-student relationship and expected the teacher to hold power in both online and face-to-face environments. Teachers expressed a desire to lessen hierarchical relationships and attempted to minimise power differentials when online or face-to-face. Strategies for reducing power distance included addressing students by name, using informal and respectful communication, establishing common ground and showing their 'humane' side.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>To achieve greater partnership with students, it is recommended that educators recognise students' strengths and leverage possibilities within their chosen learning environment to modulate the degree of power distance, promote participation and optimise learning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.70025\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.70025","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学生与教师的关系会影响学习,而权力距离是这种关系的重要组成部分。本研究利用Hofstede的国家文化模型来比较英国和斯里兰卡的学生和教师在在线和面对面学习环境中的权力体验。方法:采用定性、探索性方法。在两种环境下,对本科医学生和教师进行了14次访谈和2个焦点小组,在此期间,参与者得出了他们在两种学习环境(在线和面对面)中对权力的看法。这些丰富的图片是用美学分析和参与者的采访回答来分析的,以探索模式和构建报告的主题。结果:虽然文化和学习环境的差异是意料之中的,但两国师生对师生关系中的权力距离有着共同的理解,并且在网络和面对面环境中都期望教师掌握权力。教师们表达了减少等级关系的愿望,并试图在在线或面对面时尽量减少权力差异。减少权力距离的策略包括称呼学生的名字,使用非正式和尊重的交流,建立共同点,展示他们“人性化”的一面。讨论:为了与学生建立更紧密的合作关系,我们建议教育工作者认识到学生的优势,并在他们选择的学习环境中利用各种可能性来调节权力距离的程度,促进参与和优化学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Power distance within online and face-to-face medical education in Sri Lanka and the UK.

Introduction: The student-teacher relationship can impact learning - power distance is an integral component of this relationship. This study drew on Hofstede's Model of National Culture to compare UK and Sri Lankan students' and teachers' experiences of power in online and face-to-face learning environments.

Methods: A qualitative, exploratory approach was employed. Fourteen interviews and two focus groups were undertaken with undergraduate medical students and teachers in the two settings, during which participants drew their perceptions of power in both learning environments (online and face-to-face). These rich pictures were analysed using aesthetic analysis alongside participants' interview responses, to explore patterns and construct themes for reporting.

Results: Though differences between cultures and learning environments were expected, teachers and students in both countries shared understandings of power distance in the teacher-student relationship and expected the teacher to hold power in both online and face-to-face environments. Teachers expressed a desire to lessen hierarchical relationships and attempted to minimise power differentials when online or face-to-face. Strategies for reducing power distance included addressing students by name, using informal and respectful communication, establishing common ground and showing their 'humane' side.

Discussion: To achieve greater partnership with students, it is recommended that educators recognise students' strengths and leverage possibilities within their chosen learning environment to modulate the degree of power distance, promote participation and optimise learning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Education
Medical Education 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
279
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education seeks to be the pre-eminent journal in the field of education for health care professionals, and publishes material of the highest quality, reflecting world wide or provocative issues and perspectives. The journal welcomes high quality papers on all aspects of health professional education including; -undergraduate education -postgraduate training -continuing professional development -interprofessional education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信