{"title":"中国青少年捍卫者亚群识别及其课堂分布模式:社会-生态多层次潜在分析","authors":"Ning Xu, Hong Zou, Caina Li, Ping Ren","doi":"10.1007/s10964-025-02255-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Defenders are critical in preventing school bullying, yet the association of their heterogeneity with social-ecological factors remains underexplored, especially over long-term development. Using a multilevel framework, this longitudinal study examined subgroups of defenders among Chinese adolescents, their distribution patterns at the classroom level, and how social-ecological factors influence these subgroups. Data were collected from 3569 junior high school students (initial M<sub>age</sub> = 12.69 ± 0.49, 47.5% girls) across 76 classrooms in three waves at half-year intervals. Multilevel latent profile analysis identified six defender subgroups (frequent aggressive, frequent nonaggressive, moderate aggressive, moderate nonaggressive, infrequent, and nondefenders) and two classroom patterns (high- and low-defending). From the first to the second semester of eighth grade, nonaggressive defenders generally decreased, while aggressive, infrequent, and nondefenders increased at both the student and classroom levels. Furthermore, social status, classroom status hierarchy, and classroom bullying norms predicted defender subgroups, with effects that varied over time. These findings emphasize the necessity of considering defender heterogeneity from a social-ecological perspective and offer insights for classroom-level interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":17624,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Youth and Adolescence","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying Defender Subgroups and Their Classroom Distribution Patterns in Chinese Adolescents: A Social-Ecological Multilevel Latent Profile Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ning Xu, Hong Zou, Caina Li, Ping Ren\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10964-025-02255-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Defenders are critical in preventing school bullying, yet the association of their heterogeneity with social-ecological factors remains underexplored, especially over long-term development. Using a multilevel framework, this longitudinal study examined subgroups of defenders among Chinese adolescents, their distribution patterns at the classroom level, and how social-ecological factors influence these subgroups. Data were collected from 3569 junior high school students (initial M<sub>age</sub> = 12.69 ± 0.49, 47.5% girls) across 76 classrooms in three waves at half-year intervals. Multilevel latent profile analysis identified six defender subgroups (frequent aggressive, frequent nonaggressive, moderate aggressive, moderate nonaggressive, infrequent, and nondefenders) and two classroom patterns (high- and low-defending). From the first to the second semester of eighth grade, nonaggressive defenders generally decreased, while aggressive, infrequent, and nondefenders increased at both the student and classroom levels. Furthermore, social status, classroom status hierarchy, and classroom bullying norms predicted defender subgroups, with effects that varied over time. These findings emphasize the necessity of considering defender heterogeneity from a social-ecological perspective and offer insights for classroom-level interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17624,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Youth and Adolescence\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Youth and Adolescence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-025-02255-z\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Youth and Adolescence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-025-02255-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Identifying Defender Subgroups and Their Classroom Distribution Patterns in Chinese Adolescents: A Social-Ecological Multilevel Latent Profile Analysis.
Defenders are critical in preventing school bullying, yet the association of their heterogeneity with social-ecological factors remains underexplored, especially over long-term development. Using a multilevel framework, this longitudinal study examined subgroups of defenders among Chinese adolescents, their distribution patterns at the classroom level, and how social-ecological factors influence these subgroups. Data were collected from 3569 junior high school students (initial Mage = 12.69 ± 0.49, 47.5% girls) across 76 classrooms in three waves at half-year intervals. Multilevel latent profile analysis identified six defender subgroups (frequent aggressive, frequent nonaggressive, moderate aggressive, moderate nonaggressive, infrequent, and nondefenders) and two classroom patterns (high- and low-defending). From the first to the second semester of eighth grade, nonaggressive defenders generally decreased, while aggressive, infrequent, and nondefenders increased at both the student and classroom levels. Furthermore, social status, classroom status hierarchy, and classroom bullying norms predicted defender subgroups, with effects that varied over time. These findings emphasize the necessity of considering defender heterogeneity from a social-ecological perspective and offer insights for classroom-level interventions.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence provides a single, high-level medium of communication for psychologists, psychiatrists, biologists, criminologists, educators, and researchers in many other allied disciplines who address the subject of youth and adolescence. The journal publishes quantitative analyses, theoretical papers, and comprehensive review articles. The journal especially welcomes empirically rigorous papers that take policy implications seriously. Research need not have been designed to address policy needs, but manuscripts must address implications for the manner society formally (e.g., through laws, policies or regulations) or informally (e.g., through parents, peers, and social institutions) responds to the period of youth and adolescence.