理清头绪：重新思考在线护理讨论论坛

IF 1.7 Q2 NURSING

Teaching and Learning in Nursing Pub Date : 2025-07-28 DOI:10.1016/j.teln.2025.04.018

Michael Coriasco MNE, RN, CNE , Jeffrey R. Jones MET , Heather Hawk DNP, RN, CNE

{"title":"理清头绪：重新思考在线护理讨论论坛","authors":"Michael Coriasco MNE, RN, CNE , Jeffrey R. Jones MET , Heather Hawk DNP, RN, CNE","doi":"10.1016/j.teln.2025.04.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Student-led discussions offer an alternative model for online asynchronous discussion forums, shifting facilitation from instructors to students and aligning with universal design for learning (UDL) principles.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study examines students' perceptions of student-led discussions in online nursing education and their effectiveness compared to traditional discussion forums.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A qualitative study utilizing reflexive thematic analysis (RTA) to generate themes through analysis of anonymous student feedback about student-led discussions from 2 nursing courses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Four themes were generated: (1) Informal conversations foster authenticity, (2) Collaborative learning through peer interaction, (3) Diverse pathways to learning, and (4) Freedom to express and explore. Students valued the conversational nature of discussions, the opportunity for deeper peer engagement, and the flexibility to explore topics of interest.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Findings suggest that student-led discussions enhance student engagement and align with UDL principles, promoting autonomy and meaningful learning experiences. Implementing this approach in nursing education may improve student satisfaction and engagement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46287,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","volume":"20 4","pages":"Pages 333-337"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Untangling threads: Rethinking online nursing discussion forums\",\"authors\":\"Michael Coriasco MNE, RN, CNE , Jeffrey R. Jones MET , Heather Hawk DNP, RN, CNE\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.teln.2025.04.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Student-led discussions offer an alternative model for online asynchronous discussion forums, shifting facilitation from instructors to students and aligning with universal design for learning (UDL) principles.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study examines students' perceptions of student-led discussions in online nursing education and their effectiveness compared to traditional discussion forums.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A qualitative study utilizing reflexive thematic analysis (RTA) to generate themes through analysis of anonymous student feedback about student-led discussions from 2 nursing courses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Four themes were generated: (1) Informal conversations foster authenticity, (2) Collaborative learning through peer interaction, (3) Diverse pathways to learning, and (4) Freedom to express and explore. Students valued the conversational nature of discussions, the opportunity for deeper peer engagement, and the flexibility to explore topics of interest.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Findings suggest that student-led discussions enhance student engagement and align with UDL principles, promoting autonomy and meaningful learning experiences. Implementing this approach in nursing education may improve student satisfaction and engagement.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teaching and Learning in Nursing\",\"volume\":\"20 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 333-337\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teaching and Learning in Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308725001386\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308725001386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

学生主导的讨论为在线异步讨论论坛提供了另一种模式，将促进从教师转移到学生身上，并与学习通用设计（UDL）原则保持一致。目的本研究考察学生对在线护理教育中以学生为主导的讨论的看法，并将其与传统论坛进行比较。方法定性研究采用反思性主题分析（RTA），通过对两门护理课程学生主导讨论的匿名反馈进行分析，得出主题。结果产生了四个主题：(1)非正式对话培养真实性；(2)通过同伴互动进行协作学习；(3)多样化的学习途径；(4)表达和探索的自由。学生们重视讨论的对话性质，更深入的同伴参与的机会，以及探索感兴趣话题的灵活性。研究结果表明，学生主导的讨论提高了学生的参与度，符合UDL原则，促进了自主性和有意义的学习体验。在护理教育中实施这种方法可以提高学生的满意度和参与度。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Untangling threads: Rethinking online nursing discussion forums

Background

Student-led discussions offer an alternative model for online asynchronous discussion forums, shifting facilitation from instructors to students and aligning with universal design for learning (UDL) principles.

Aim

This study examines students' perceptions of student-led discussions in online nursing education and their effectiveness compared to traditional discussion forums.

Methods

A qualitative study utilizing reflexive thematic analysis (RTA) to generate themes through analysis of anonymous student feedback about student-led discussions from 2 nursing courses.

Results

Four themes were generated: (1) Informal conversations foster authenticity, (2) Collaborative learning through peer interaction, (3) Diverse pathways to learning, and (4) Freedom to express and explore. Students valued the conversational nature of discussions, the opportunity for deeper peer engagement, and the flexibility to explore topics of interest.

Conclusions

Findings suggest that student-led discussions enhance student engagement and align with UDL principles, promoting autonomy and meaningful learning experiences. Implementing this approach in nursing education may improve student satisfaction and engagement.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Teaching and Learning in Nursing NURSING-

CiteScore

2.60

自引率

10.50%

发文量

119

审稿时长

37 days

期刊介绍： Teaching and Learning in Nursing is the Official Journal of the National Organization of Associate Degree Nursing. The journal is dedicated to the advancement of Associate Degree Nursing education and practice, and promotes collaboration in charting the future of health care education and delivery. Topics include: - Managing Different Learning Styles - New Faculty Mentoring - Legal Issues - Research - Legislative Issues - Instructional Design Strategies - Leadership, Management Roles - Unique Funding for Programs and Faculty