{"title":"单向和组合载荷作用下常规和改进型吸力沉箱的数值研究和基于ml的计算公式","authors":"Kewen Zhu , Hang Feng , Jian Yu , Sen Li","doi":"10.1016/j.compgeo.2025.107637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The modified suction caisson (MSC), incorporating an external short-skirted structure in addition to its inner caisson, represents an innovative variant of the conventional suction caisson (CSC) in offshore engineering. However, currently available studies lack a comprehensive comparative analysis of CSCs and MSCs and a unified prediction formulation for these foundations, which are essential for practical engineering design. To address this gap, this study systematically compares bearing capacities of CSCs and MSCs under unidirectional and combined loadings using finite element limit analysis (FELA), and proposes a unified failure envelope formulation via the evolutionary polynomial regression (EPR) machine learning technique. In particular, key influencing factors including caisson geometries, soil strength profiles, and interface adhesion are also systematically analyzed. FELA results reveal design recommendations: (i) the failure envelope of MSC and CSC is primarily influenced by the embedment ratio of the inner caisson, with minimal effects from interface adhesion or soil strength heterogeneity; (ii) a 20% increase in external skirt width results in improvements of at least 20% and 23% in vertical and lateral bearing capacities, respectively; and (iii) the lateral capacity becomes independent of the external skirt length once it exceeds 20% of the inner caisson length. Using the FELA dataset, the EPR technique can provide unified and effective bearing capacity formulations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55217,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Geotechnics","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 107637"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Numerical investigation and ML-based formulation for conventional and modified suction caissons subjected to unidirectional and combined loadings\",\"authors\":\"Kewen Zhu , Hang Feng , Jian Yu , Sen Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compgeo.2025.107637\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The modified suction caisson (MSC), incorporating an external short-skirted structure in addition to its inner caisson, represents an innovative variant of the conventional suction caisson (CSC) in offshore engineering. However, currently available studies lack a comprehensive comparative analysis of CSCs and MSCs and a unified prediction formulation for these foundations, which are essential for practical engineering design. To address this gap, this study systematically compares bearing capacities of CSCs and MSCs under unidirectional and combined loadings using finite element limit analysis (FELA), and proposes a unified failure envelope formulation via the evolutionary polynomial regression (EPR) machine learning technique. In particular, key influencing factors including caisson geometries, soil strength profiles, and interface adhesion are also systematically analyzed. FELA results reveal design recommendations: (i) the failure envelope of MSC and CSC is primarily influenced by the embedment ratio of the inner caisson, with minimal effects from interface adhesion or soil strength heterogeneity; (ii) a 20% increase in external skirt width results in improvements of at least 20% and 23% in vertical and lateral bearing capacities, respectively; and (iii) the lateral capacity becomes independent of the external skirt length once it exceeds 20% of the inner caisson length. Using the FELA dataset, the EPR technique can provide unified and effective bearing capacity formulations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers and Geotechnics\",\"volume\":\"189 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107637\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers and Geotechnics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266352X25005865\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Geotechnics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266352X25005865","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Numerical investigation and ML-based formulation for conventional and modified suction caissons subjected to unidirectional and combined loadings
The modified suction caisson (MSC), incorporating an external short-skirted structure in addition to its inner caisson, represents an innovative variant of the conventional suction caisson (CSC) in offshore engineering. However, currently available studies lack a comprehensive comparative analysis of CSCs and MSCs and a unified prediction formulation for these foundations, which are essential for practical engineering design. To address this gap, this study systematically compares bearing capacities of CSCs and MSCs under unidirectional and combined loadings using finite element limit analysis (FELA), and proposes a unified failure envelope formulation via the evolutionary polynomial regression (EPR) machine learning technique. In particular, key influencing factors including caisson geometries, soil strength profiles, and interface adhesion are also systematically analyzed. FELA results reveal design recommendations: (i) the failure envelope of MSC and CSC is primarily influenced by the embedment ratio of the inner caisson, with minimal effects from interface adhesion or soil strength heterogeneity; (ii) a 20% increase in external skirt width results in improvements of at least 20% and 23% in vertical and lateral bearing capacities, respectively; and (iii) the lateral capacity becomes independent of the external skirt length once it exceeds 20% of the inner caisson length. Using the FELA dataset, the EPR technique can provide unified and effective bearing capacity formulations.
期刊介绍:
The use of computers is firmly established in geotechnical engineering and continues to grow rapidly in both engineering practice and academe. The development of advanced numerical techniques and constitutive modeling, in conjunction with rapid developments in computer hardware, enables problems to be tackled that were unthinkable even a few years ago. Computers and Geotechnics provides an up-to-date reference for engineers and researchers engaged in computer aided analysis and research in geotechnical engineering. The journal is intended for an expeditious dissemination of advanced computer applications across a broad range of geotechnical topics. Contributions on advances in numerical algorithms, computer implementation of new constitutive models and probabilistic methods are especially encouraged.