单向和组合载荷作用下常规和改进型吸力沉箱的数值研究和基于ml的计算公式

IF 6.2 1区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Kewen Zhu , Hang Feng , Jian Yu , Sen Li
{"title":"单向和组合载荷作用下常规和改进型吸力沉箱的数值研究和基于ml的计算公式","authors":"Kewen Zhu ,&nbsp;Hang Feng ,&nbsp;Jian Yu ,&nbsp;Sen Li","doi":"10.1016/j.compgeo.2025.107637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The modified suction caisson (MSC), incorporating an external short-skirted structure in addition to its inner caisson, represents an innovative variant of the conventional suction caisson (CSC) in offshore engineering. However, currently available studies lack a comprehensive comparative analysis of CSCs and MSCs and a unified prediction formulation for these foundations, which are essential for practical engineering design. To address this gap, this study systematically compares bearing capacities of CSCs and MSCs under unidirectional and combined loadings using finite element limit analysis (FELA), and proposes a unified failure envelope formulation via the evolutionary polynomial regression (EPR) machine learning technique. In particular, key influencing factors including caisson geometries, soil strength profiles, and interface adhesion are also systematically analyzed. FELA results reveal design recommendations: (i) the failure envelope of MSC and CSC is primarily influenced by the embedment ratio of the inner caisson, with minimal effects from interface adhesion or soil strength heterogeneity; (ii) a 20% increase in external skirt width results in improvements of at least 20% and 23% in vertical and lateral bearing capacities, respectively; and (iii) the lateral capacity becomes independent of the external skirt length once it exceeds 20% of the inner caisson length. Using the FELA dataset, the EPR technique can provide unified and effective bearing capacity formulations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55217,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Geotechnics","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 107637"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Numerical investigation and ML-based formulation for conventional and modified suction caissons subjected to unidirectional and combined loadings\",\"authors\":\"Kewen Zhu ,&nbsp;Hang Feng ,&nbsp;Jian Yu ,&nbsp;Sen Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compgeo.2025.107637\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The modified suction caisson (MSC), incorporating an external short-skirted structure in addition to its inner caisson, represents an innovative variant of the conventional suction caisson (CSC) in offshore engineering. However, currently available studies lack a comprehensive comparative analysis of CSCs and MSCs and a unified prediction formulation for these foundations, which are essential for practical engineering design. To address this gap, this study systematically compares bearing capacities of CSCs and MSCs under unidirectional and combined loadings using finite element limit analysis (FELA), and proposes a unified failure envelope formulation via the evolutionary polynomial regression (EPR) machine learning technique. In particular, key influencing factors including caisson geometries, soil strength profiles, and interface adhesion are also systematically analyzed. FELA results reveal design recommendations: (i) the failure envelope of MSC and CSC is primarily influenced by the embedment ratio of the inner caisson, with minimal effects from interface adhesion or soil strength heterogeneity; (ii) a 20% increase in external skirt width results in improvements of at least 20% and 23% in vertical and lateral bearing capacities, respectively; and (iii) the lateral capacity becomes independent of the external skirt length once it exceeds 20% of the inner caisson length. Using the FELA dataset, the EPR technique can provide unified and effective bearing capacity formulations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers and Geotechnics\",\"volume\":\"189 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107637\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers and Geotechnics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266352X25005865\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Geotechnics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266352X25005865","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

改进型吸式沉箱(MSC)除了内部沉箱外,还采用了外部短裙边结构,是海上工程中传统吸式沉箱(CSC)的创新变种。然而,目前的研究缺乏对CSCs和MSCs的综合比较分析和统一的预测公式,这对实际工程设计至关重要。为了解决这一差距,本研究使用有限元极限分析(FELA)系统地比较了CSCs和MSCs在单向和组合载荷下的承载能力,并通过进化多项式回归(EPR)机器学习技术提出了统一的失效包络公式。特别对沉箱几何形状、土体强度剖面、界面附着力等关键影响因素进行了系统分析。FELA结果揭示了设计建议:(i) MSC和CSC的破坏包络主要受内沉箱嵌入比的影响,界面粘附性或土壤强度非均质性的影响最小;(ii)外部裙边宽度增加20%,垂直和横向承载能力分别提高至少20%和23%;(3)当裙边长度超过内沉箱长度的20%时,横向承载力与外裙边长度无关。利用FELA数据集,EPR技术可以提供统一有效的承载力计算公式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Numerical investigation and ML-based formulation for conventional and modified suction caissons subjected to unidirectional and combined loadings
The modified suction caisson (MSC), incorporating an external short-skirted structure in addition to its inner caisson, represents an innovative variant of the conventional suction caisson (CSC) in offshore engineering. However, currently available studies lack a comprehensive comparative analysis of CSCs and MSCs and a unified prediction formulation for these foundations, which are essential for practical engineering design. To address this gap, this study systematically compares bearing capacities of CSCs and MSCs under unidirectional and combined loadings using finite element limit analysis (FELA), and proposes a unified failure envelope formulation via the evolutionary polynomial regression (EPR) machine learning technique. In particular, key influencing factors including caisson geometries, soil strength profiles, and interface adhesion are also systematically analyzed. FELA results reveal design recommendations: (i) the failure envelope of MSC and CSC is primarily influenced by the embedment ratio of the inner caisson, with minimal effects from interface adhesion or soil strength heterogeneity; (ii) a 20% increase in external skirt width results in improvements of at least 20% and 23% in vertical and lateral bearing capacities, respectively; and (iii) the lateral capacity becomes independent of the external skirt length once it exceeds 20% of the inner caisson length. Using the FELA dataset, the EPR technique can provide unified and effective bearing capacity formulations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers and Geotechnics
Computers and Geotechnics 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
15.10%
发文量
438
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: The use of computers is firmly established in geotechnical engineering and continues to grow rapidly in both engineering practice and academe. The development of advanced numerical techniques and constitutive modeling, in conjunction with rapid developments in computer hardware, enables problems to be tackled that were unthinkable even a few years ago. Computers and Geotechnics provides an up-to-date reference for engineers and researchers engaged in computer aided analysis and research in geotechnical engineering. The journal is intended for an expeditious dissemination of advanced computer applications across a broad range of geotechnical topics. Contributions on advances in numerical algorithms, computer implementation of new constitutive models and probabilistic methods are especially encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信