护生对ChatGPT在护理教育中使用的认知和伦理考虑:一项横断面研究

IF 1.7 Q2 NURSING
Hosny Maher Sultan, Beryl Juliet Sam, Remya R. Pillai
{"title":"护生对ChatGPT在护理教育中使用的认知和伦理考虑:一项横断面研究","authors":"Hosny Maher Sultan,&nbsp;Beryl Juliet Sam,&nbsp;Remya R. Pillai","doi":"10.1016/j.teln.2025.06.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Artificial intelligence tools like ChatGPT are increasingly integrated into nursing education, yet concerns about accuracy, academic integrity, and ethical implications remain underexplored.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To examine nursing students’ perceptions, usage patterns, and ethical concerns regarding ChatGPT in nursing education.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Cross-sectional descriptive study conducted at a UAE university. Fifty-five undergraduate nursing students participated using a validated structured questionnaire (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.71). Chi-square tests analyzed associations between variables.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Most students used ChatGPT for exam preparation (74.5%) and coursework (63.6%). While 81.8% verified responses, 87.3% encountered misinformation. Significant associations existed between usage frequency and academic year (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). Students expressed concerns about academic dishonesty and over-reliance.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Nursing students widely adopt ChatGPT despite accuracy and ethical concerns. Findings highlight urgent needs for AI literacy programs, ethical frameworks, and institutional guidelines for responsible AI integration in nursing education.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46287,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","volume":"20 4","pages":"Pages e1197-e1206"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nursing students’ perceptions and ethical considerations of ChatGPT usage in nursing education: A cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"Hosny Maher Sultan,&nbsp;Beryl Juliet Sam,&nbsp;Remya R. Pillai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.teln.2025.06.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Artificial intelligence tools like ChatGPT are increasingly integrated into nursing education, yet concerns about accuracy, academic integrity, and ethical implications remain underexplored.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To examine nursing students’ perceptions, usage patterns, and ethical concerns regarding ChatGPT in nursing education.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Cross-sectional descriptive study conducted at a UAE university. Fifty-five undergraduate nursing students participated using a validated structured questionnaire (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.71). Chi-square tests analyzed associations between variables.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Most students used ChatGPT for exam preparation (74.5%) and coursework (63.6%). While 81.8% verified responses, 87.3% encountered misinformation. Significant associations existed between usage frequency and academic year (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). Students expressed concerns about academic dishonesty and over-reliance.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Nursing students widely adopt ChatGPT despite accuracy and ethical concerns. Findings highlight urgent needs for AI literacy programs, ethical frameworks, and institutional guidelines for responsible AI integration in nursing education.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teaching and Learning in Nursing\",\"volume\":\"20 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages e1197-e1206\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teaching and Learning in Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308725002008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308725002008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

ChatGPT等人工智能工具越来越多地融入护理教育,但对准确性、学术诚信和伦理影响的担忧仍未得到充分探讨。目的探讨护生在护理教育中对ChatGPT的认知、使用模式和伦理问题。方法在阿联酋一所大学进行横断面描述性研究。55名本科护生采用有效的结构化问卷(Cronbach’s alpha = 0.71)参与。卡方检验分析变量之间的关联。结果大部分学生将ChatGPT用于备考(74.5%)和课程作业(63.6%)。81.8%的回复得到了验证,87.3%的回复遇到了错误信息。使用频率与学年之间存在显著相关(p < 0.05)。学生们表达了对学术不诚实和过度依赖的担忧。结论尽管存在准确性和伦理问题,但护生广泛采用ChatGPT。研究结果强调,迫切需要人工智能扫盲计划、伦理框架和机构指南,以负责任地将人工智能融入护理教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nursing students’ perceptions and ethical considerations of ChatGPT usage in nursing education: A cross-sectional study

Background

Artificial intelligence tools like ChatGPT are increasingly integrated into nursing education, yet concerns about accuracy, academic integrity, and ethical implications remain underexplored.

Aim

To examine nursing students’ perceptions, usage patterns, and ethical concerns regarding ChatGPT in nursing education.

Methods

Cross-sectional descriptive study conducted at a UAE university. Fifty-five undergraduate nursing students participated using a validated structured questionnaire (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.71). Chi-square tests analyzed associations between variables.

Results

Most students used ChatGPT for exam preparation (74.5%) and coursework (63.6%). While 81.8% verified responses, 87.3% encountered misinformation. Significant associations existed between usage frequency and academic year (p < 0.05). Students expressed concerns about academic dishonesty and over-reliance.

Conclusions

Nursing students widely adopt ChatGPT despite accuracy and ethical concerns. Findings highlight urgent needs for AI literacy programs, ethical frameworks, and institutional guidelines for responsible AI integration in nursing education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
119
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Teaching and Learning in Nursing is the Official Journal of the National Organization of Associate Degree Nursing. The journal is dedicated to the advancement of Associate Degree Nursing education and practice, and promotes collaboration in charting the future of health care education and delivery. Topics include: - Managing Different Learning Styles - New Faculty Mentoring - Legal Issues - Research - Legislative Issues - Instructional Design Strategies - Leadership, Management Roles - Unique Funding for Programs and Faculty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信