人工智能在护生学术写作中的应用:一项质的研究

IF 1.7 Q2 NURSING
Jandy Perra Jembu, Rekaya Vincent Balang
{"title":"人工智能在护生学术写作中的应用:一项质的研究","authors":"Jandy Perra Jembu,&nbsp;Rekaya Vincent Balang","doi":"10.1016/j.teln.2025.04.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>There has been an increase in the use of AI-based tools, such as Grammarly and ChatGPT, in academic writing, offering potential benefits and challenges to students across various fields.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study aimed to explore how nursing students perceive the use of AI tools in their academic writing and identify the factors influencing their adoption.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A descriptive qualitative research design was employed. Eleven nursing students (9 from public and 2 from private universities) across Malaysia participated through snowball and purposive sampling. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, and data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis with NVivo 14.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Four themes emerged: perceived strengths of AI adoption (increased productivity and improved writing quality); perceived flaws (concerns over data accuracy and plagiarism); influential factors (peer and family support); and systemic barriers (lack of formal training and financial constraints).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>AI tools provide academic advantages, but ethical concerns and resource limitations must be addressed. Theoretically, this study informs AI adoption in higher education. Practically, it offers insights to guide institutional support and integration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46287,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","volume":"20 4","pages":"Pages e1012-e1020"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence adoption in nursing students' academic writing: A qualitative study\",\"authors\":\"Jandy Perra Jembu,&nbsp;Rekaya Vincent Balang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.teln.2025.04.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>There has been an increase in the use of AI-based tools, such as Grammarly and ChatGPT, in academic writing, offering potential benefits and challenges to students across various fields.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study aimed to explore how nursing students perceive the use of AI tools in their academic writing and identify the factors influencing their adoption.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A descriptive qualitative research design was employed. Eleven nursing students (9 from public and 2 from private universities) across Malaysia participated through snowball and purposive sampling. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, and data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis with NVivo 14.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Four themes emerged: perceived strengths of AI adoption (increased productivity and improved writing quality); perceived flaws (concerns over data accuracy and plagiarism); influential factors (peer and family support); and systemic barriers (lack of formal training and financial constraints).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>AI tools provide academic advantages, but ethical concerns and resource limitations must be addressed. Theoretically, this study informs AI adoption in higher education. Practically, it offers insights to guide institutional support and integration.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teaching and Learning in Nursing\",\"volume\":\"20 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages e1012-e1020\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teaching and Learning in Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308725001350\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308725001350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在学术写作中,越来越多地使用基于人工智能的工具,如Grammarly和ChatGPT,为各个领域的学生提供了潜在的好处和挑战。目的本研究旨在探讨护理学生如何看待在学术写作中使用人工智能工具,并确定影响其采用的因素。方法采用描述性定性研究设计。来自马来西亚的11名护理专业学生(9名来自公立大学,2名来自私立大学)通过滚雪球和有目的的抽样参与了调查。进行了半结构化访谈,并使用Braun和Clarke的NVivo 14主题分析来分析数据。结果出现了四个主题:采用人工智能的感知优势(提高生产力和提高写作质量);感知缺陷(对数据准确性和剽窃的担忧);影响因素(同伴和家庭支持);以及系统性障碍(缺乏正规培训和财政限制)。结论人工智能工具具有学术优势,但必须解决伦理问题和资源限制问题。从理论上讲,这项研究为高等教育采用人工智能提供了参考。实际上,它提供了指导制度支持和整合的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial intelligence adoption in nursing students' academic writing: A qualitative study

Background

There has been an increase in the use of AI-based tools, such as Grammarly and ChatGPT, in academic writing, offering potential benefits and challenges to students across various fields.

Aim

This study aimed to explore how nursing students perceive the use of AI tools in their academic writing and identify the factors influencing their adoption.

Methods

A descriptive qualitative research design was employed. Eleven nursing students (9 from public and 2 from private universities) across Malaysia participated through snowball and purposive sampling. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, and data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis with NVivo 14.

Results

Four themes emerged: perceived strengths of AI adoption (increased productivity and improved writing quality); perceived flaws (concerns over data accuracy and plagiarism); influential factors (peer and family support); and systemic barriers (lack of formal training and financial constraints).

Conclusions

AI tools provide academic advantages, but ethical concerns and resource limitations must be addressed. Theoretically, this study informs AI adoption in higher education. Practically, it offers insights to guide institutional support and integration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
119
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Teaching and Learning in Nursing is the Official Journal of the National Organization of Associate Degree Nursing. The journal is dedicated to the advancement of Associate Degree Nursing education and practice, and promotes collaboration in charting the future of health care education and delivery. Topics include: - Managing Different Learning Styles - New Faculty Mentoring - Legal Issues - Research - Legislative Issues - Instructional Design Strategies - Leadership, Management Roles - Unique Funding for Programs and Faculty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信