以父母为中心的行为干预预防儿童早期肥胖(TOPCHILD):一项系统综述和个体参与者数据荟萃分析

Kylie E Hunter, David Nguyen, Sol Libesman, Jonathan G Williams, Mason Aberoumand, Jannik Aagerup, Brittany J Johnson, Rebecca K Golley, Angie Barba, James X Sotiropoulos, Nipun Shrestha, Talia Palacios, Samantha J Pryde, Luke Wolfenden, Rachael W Taylor, Peter J Godolphin, Karen Matvienko-Sikar, Lee M Sanders, Kristy P Robledo, Vicki Brown, Anna Lene Seidler
{"title":"以父母为中心的行为干预预防儿童早期肥胖(TOPCHILD):一项系统综述和个体参与者数据荟萃分析","authors":"Kylie E Hunter, David Nguyen, Sol Libesman, Jonathan G Williams, Mason Aberoumand, Jannik Aagerup, Brittany J Johnson, Rebecca K Golley, Angie Barba, James X Sotiropoulos, Nipun Shrestha, Talia Palacios, Samantha J Pryde, Luke Wolfenden, Rachael W Taylor, Peter J Godolphin, Karen Matvienko-Sikar, Lee M Sanders, Kristy P Robledo, Vicki Brown, Anna Lene Seidler","doi":"10.1016/s0140-6736(25)01144-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background</h3>Childhood obesity is a global public health issue, which has prompted governments to invest in prevention programmes. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of parent-focused early childhood obesity prevention interventions globally.<h3>Methods</h3>We did a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. We searched databases and trial registries (MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, PsycInfo, <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg aria-label=\"Opens in new window\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"20\" viewbox=\"0 0 8 8\"><path d=\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\"></path></svg></span>, and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform) from inception until Sept 30, 2024, for randomised controlled trials commencing before 12 months of age examining parent-focused behavioural interventions to prevent obesity in children, compared with usual care, no intervention, or attention control. Individual participant data were checked, harmonised, and assessed for integrity and risk of bias. We excluded trials that were quasi-randomised, investigated pregnancy-only interventions, or did not collect any child weight-related outcomes. The primary outcome was BMI Z score at age 24 months (±6 months). We did an intention-to-treat, two-stage, random effects meta-analysis to examine effects overall and for prespecified subgroups. We assessed certainty of evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42020177408.<h3>Findings</h3>Of 19 990 identified records, 47 (0·24%) trials were completed and eligible. Of these, 18 (38%) assessed our primary outcome, BMI Z score. We obtained individual participant data for 17 (94%; n=9128) of these 18 trials (n=9383), representing 97% of eligible participants. Of these 9128 participants, 4549 (50%) were boys, 4415 (48%) were girls, and 164 (2%) had unknown sex. We found no evidence of an effect of interventions on BMI Z score at age 24 months (±6 months; mean difference –0·01 [95% CI –0·08 to 0·05]; high certainty evidence, τ<sup>2</sup>=0·01; n=6505; 2623 missing). Findings were robust to prespecified sensitivity analyses (eg, different analysis methods and missing data), and we found no evidence of differential intervention effects for prespecified subgroups including priority populations and trial-level factors.<h3>Interpretation</h3>These findings indicate that examined parent-focused behavioural interventions are insufficient to prevent obesity at age 24 months (±6 months). This evidence highlights a need to re-think childhood obesity prevention approaches.<h3>Funding</h3>Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.","PeriodicalId":22898,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet","volume":"86 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parent-focused behavioural interventions for the prevention of early childhood obesity (TOPCHILD): a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Kylie E Hunter, David Nguyen, Sol Libesman, Jonathan G Williams, Mason Aberoumand, Jannik Aagerup, Brittany J Johnson, Rebecca K Golley, Angie Barba, James X Sotiropoulos, Nipun Shrestha, Talia Palacios, Samantha J Pryde, Luke Wolfenden, Rachael W Taylor, Peter J Godolphin, Karen Matvienko-Sikar, Lee M Sanders, Kristy P Robledo, Vicki Brown, Anna Lene Seidler\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/s0140-6736(25)01144-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Background</h3>Childhood obesity is a global public health issue, which has prompted governments to invest in prevention programmes. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of parent-focused early childhood obesity prevention interventions globally.<h3>Methods</h3>We did a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. We searched databases and trial registries (MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, PsycInfo, <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg aria-label=\\\"Opens in new window\\\" focusable=\\\"false\\\" height=\\\"20\\\" viewbox=\\\"0 0 8 8\\\"><path d=\\\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\\\"></path></svg></span>, and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform) from inception until Sept 30, 2024, for randomised controlled trials commencing before 12 months of age examining parent-focused behavioural interventions to prevent obesity in children, compared with usual care, no intervention, or attention control. Individual participant data were checked, harmonised, and assessed for integrity and risk of bias. We excluded trials that were quasi-randomised, investigated pregnancy-only interventions, or did not collect any child weight-related outcomes. The primary outcome was BMI Z score at age 24 months (±6 months). We did an intention-to-treat, two-stage, random effects meta-analysis to examine effects overall and for prespecified subgroups. We assessed certainty of evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42020177408.<h3>Findings</h3>Of 19 990 identified records, 47 (0·24%) trials were completed and eligible. Of these, 18 (38%) assessed our primary outcome, BMI Z score. We obtained individual participant data for 17 (94%; n=9128) of these 18 trials (n=9383), representing 97% of eligible participants. Of these 9128 participants, 4549 (50%) were boys, 4415 (48%) were girls, and 164 (2%) had unknown sex. We found no evidence of an effect of interventions on BMI Z score at age 24 months (±6 months; mean difference –0·01 [95% CI –0·08 to 0·05]; high certainty evidence, τ<sup>2</sup>=0·01; n=6505; 2623 missing). Findings were robust to prespecified sensitivity analyses (eg, different analysis methods and missing data), and we found no evidence of differential intervention effects for prespecified subgroups including priority populations and trial-level factors.<h3>Interpretation</h3>These findings indicate that examined parent-focused behavioural interventions are insufficient to prevent obesity at age 24 months (±6 months). This evidence highlights a need to re-think childhood obesity prevention approaches.<h3>Funding</h3>Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Lancet\",\"volume\":\"86 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Lancet\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(25)01144-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(25)01144-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

儿童肥胖是一个全球性的公共卫生问题,这促使各国政府投资于预防规划。我们的目的是在全球范围内调查以家长为中心的儿童早期肥胖预防干预措施的有效性。方法进行系统评价和个体参与者数据荟萃分析。我们检索了数据库和试验注册中心(MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, PsycInfo, ClinicalTrials.gov和WHO国际临床试验注册平台),从开始到2024年9月30日,检索了12个月前开始的随机对照试验,与常规护理、无干预或注意控制相比,研究了以父母为中心的行为干预预防儿童肥胖的方法。对个体参与者的数据进行检查、协调,并评估其完整性和偏倚风险。我们排除了准随机、仅调查妊娠干预或未收集任何儿童体重相关结果的试验。主要终点为24个月(±6个月)时BMI Z评分。我们进行了意向治疗、两阶段随机效应荟萃分析,以检查总体效应和预先指定的亚组效应。我们使用推荐评估、发展和评价分级来评估证据的确定性。本研究已注册为PROSPERO, CRD42020177408。在19990份鉴定的记录中,有47项(0.24%)试验完成并符合条件。其中,18例(38%)评估了我们的主要结局,BMI Z评分。我们获得了18项试验(n=9383)中17项(94%;n=9128)的个体受试者数据,占符合条件受试者的97%。在这9128名参与者中,4549名(50%)是男孩,4415名(48%)是女孩,164名(2%)性别不明。我们没有发现干预措施对24月龄BMI Z评分有影响的证据(±6个月;平均差值- 0.01 [95% CI - 0.08至0.05];高确定性证据,τ2= 0.01; n=6505;缺失2623)。研究结果对预先指定的敏感性分析(例如,不同的分析方法和缺失的数据)是稳健的,我们没有发现证据表明预先指定的亚组(包括优先人群和试验水平因素)存在差异干预效果。这些发现表明,以父母为中心的行为干预不足以预防24个月(±6个月)大的肥胖。这一证据凸显了重新思考儿童肥胖预防方法的必要性。澳大利亚国家健康和医学研究委员会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Parent-focused behavioural interventions for the prevention of early childhood obesity (TOPCHILD): a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis

Background

Childhood obesity is a global public health issue, which has prompted governments to invest in prevention programmes. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of parent-focused early childhood obesity prevention interventions globally.

Methods

We did a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. We searched databases and trial registries (MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, PsycInfo, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform) from inception until Sept 30, 2024, for randomised controlled trials commencing before 12 months of age examining parent-focused behavioural interventions to prevent obesity in children, compared with usual care, no intervention, or attention control. Individual participant data were checked, harmonised, and assessed for integrity and risk of bias. We excluded trials that were quasi-randomised, investigated pregnancy-only interventions, or did not collect any child weight-related outcomes. The primary outcome was BMI Z score at age 24 months (±6 months). We did an intention-to-treat, two-stage, random effects meta-analysis to examine effects overall and for prespecified subgroups. We assessed certainty of evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42020177408.

Findings

Of 19 990 identified records, 47 (0·24%) trials were completed and eligible. Of these, 18 (38%) assessed our primary outcome, BMI Z score. We obtained individual participant data for 17 (94%; n=9128) of these 18 trials (n=9383), representing 97% of eligible participants. Of these 9128 participants, 4549 (50%) were boys, 4415 (48%) were girls, and 164 (2%) had unknown sex. We found no evidence of an effect of interventions on BMI Z score at age 24 months (±6 months; mean difference –0·01 [95% CI –0·08 to 0·05]; high certainty evidence, τ2=0·01; n=6505; 2623 missing). Findings were robust to prespecified sensitivity analyses (eg, different analysis methods and missing data), and we found no evidence of differential intervention effects for prespecified subgroups including priority populations and trial-level factors.

Interpretation

These findings indicate that examined parent-focused behavioural interventions are insufficient to prevent obesity at age 24 months (±6 months). This evidence highlights a need to re-think childhood obesity prevention approaches.

Funding

Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信