老师评估的作业是学生写的还是人工智能写的?生成式人工智能生成内容检测研究综述

IF 3.6 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Jining Han, Yuying Yang, Geping Liu
{"title":"老师评估的作业是学生写的还是人工智能写的?生成式人工智能生成内容检测研究综述","authors":"Jining Han,&nbsp;Yuying Yang,&nbsp;Geping Liu","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The rapid emergence of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in academic settings has led to growing concerns about its impact on writing and assessment practices. This paper reviews the latest literature on detecting GenAI-generated content and explores the challenges and potential solutions faced by educators. This study identifies various GenAI detection tools and analyses their strengths, weaknesses, and effectiveness across different writing contexts. It also discusses the growing complexity of GenAI outputs, including modifications by humans or other AI systems, which complicate detection efforts. The findings highlight the importance of adopting multifaceted approaches to evaluation, combining detection tools with expert human judgement to ensure academic integrity. Additionally, the results of this study suggest that pedagogical models need to evolve to accommodate the use of GenAI, advocating for a shift toward promoting critical thinking, creativity, and real-world problem solving. This review provides insights into how educators can adapt their teaching strategies and assessment methods in response to the increasing prevalence of GenAI tools in education.</p>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"60 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejed.70240","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are Teachers Assessing Work Written by Students or by AI? A Rapid Literature Review of Research on Detecting Content Generated by Generative AI\",\"authors\":\"Jining Han,&nbsp;Yuying Yang,&nbsp;Geping Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ejed.70240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The rapid emergence of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in academic settings has led to growing concerns about its impact on writing and assessment practices. This paper reviews the latest literature on detecting GenAI-generated content and explores the challenges and potential solutions faced by educators. This study identifies various GenAI detection tools and analyses their strengths, weaknesses, and effectiveness across different writing contexts. It also discusses the growing complexity of GenAI outputs, including modifications by humans or other AI systems, which complicate detection efforts. The findings highlight the importance of adopting multifaceted approaches to evaluation, combining detection tools with expert human judgement to ensure academic integrity. Additionally, the results of this study suggest that pedagogical models need to evolve to accommodate the use of GenAI, advocating for a shift toward promoting critical thinking, creativity, and real-world problem solving. This review provides insights into how educators can adapt their teaching strategies and assessment methods in response to the increasing prevalence of GenAI tools in education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Education\",\"volume\":\"60 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejed.70240\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.70240\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.70240","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生成式人工智能(GenAI)在学术环境中的迅速出现,导致人们越来越关注其对写作和评估实践的影响。本文回顾了关于检测基因生成内容的最新文献,并探讨了教育工作者面临的挑战和潜在的解决方案。本研究确定了各种GenAI检测工具,并分析了它们在不同写作环境中的优势、劣势和有效性。它还讨论了GenAI输出的日益复杂,包括人类或其他人工智能系统的修改,这些修改使检测工作复杂化。研究结果强调了采用多方面评估方法的重要性,将检测工具与专家的人类判断相结合,以确保学术诚信。此外,本研究的结果表明,教学模式需要发展以适应GenAI的使用,提倡向促进批判性思维、创造力和解决现实问题的转变。这篇综述为教育工作者如何调整他们的教学策略和评估方法提供了见解,以应对GenAI工具在教育中的日益普及。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Are Teachers Assessing Work Written by Students or by AI? A Rapid Literature Review of Research on Detecting Content Generated by Generative AI

Are Teachers Assessing Work Written by Students or by AI? A Rapid Literature Review of Research on Detecting Content Generated by Generative AI

The rapid emergence of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in academic settings has led to growing concerns about its impact on writing and assessment practices. This paper reviews the latest literature on detecting GenAI-generated content and explores the challenges and potential solutions faced by educators. This study identifies various GenAI detection tools and analyses their strengths, weaknesses, and effectiveness across different writing contexts. It also discusses the growing complexity of GenAI outputs, including modifications by humans or other AI systems, which complicate detection efforts. The findings highlight the importance of adopting multifaceted approaches to evaluation, combining detection tools with expert human judgement to ensure academic integrity. Additionally, the results of this study suggest that pedagogical models need to evolve to accommodate the use of GenAI, advocating for a shift toward promoting critical thinking, creativity, and real-world problem solving. This review provides insights into how educators can adapt their teaching strategies and assessment methods in response to the increasing prevalence of GenAI tools in education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Education
European Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The prime aims of the European Journal of Education are: - To examine, compare and assess education policies, trends, reforms and programmes of European countries in an international perspective - To disseminate policy debates and research results to a wide audience of academics, researchers, practitioners and students of education sciences - To contribute to the policy debate at the national and European level by providing European administrators and policy-makers in international organisations, national and local governments with comparative and up-to-date material centred on specific themes of common interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信