期望对伤害感受中重复抑制的影响。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Lisa-Marie G Pohle, Moritz M Nickel, Birgit Nierula, Markus Ploner, Ulrike Horn, Falk Eippert
{"title":"期望对伤害感受中重复抑制的影响。","authors":"Lisa-Marie G Pohle, Moritz M Nickel, Birgit Nierula, Markus Ploner, Ulrike Horn, Falk Eippert","doi":"10.1152/jn.00359.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Repetition suppression, the reduced neural response upon repeated presentation of a stimulus, can be explained by models focussing on bottom-up (i.e. adaptation) or top-down (i.e. expectation) mechanisms. Predictive coding models fall into the latter category and propose that repetitions are expected and therefore elicit smaller prediction error responses. While studies in the visual and auditory domain provide some support for such models, in nociception evidence remains inconclusive, despite the substantial influence expectations exert on pain perception. To assess expectation effects on repetition suppression in nociception, we developed a paradigm in which healthy volunteers received brief CO<sub>2</sub> laser stimuli, while we acquired electroencephalographic (EEG) and peripheral physiological data. Importantly, laser stimuli could be either repeated after one second or not be repeated, with the probability of repetitions manipulated in a block-wise fashion, such that repetitions were either expected or unexpected. We observed repetition suppression in laser-evoked potentials as well as laser-induced gamma band oscillations, but not in laser-induced desynchronisations in the alpha and beta band. Critically, neither these EEG responses, nor the peripheral physiological data showed significant differences between the expectation conditions, with Bayesian analyses mostly providing evidence for an absence of effects. This indicates that repetition suppression to brief nociceptive laser stimuli is not driven by top-down factors, but rather mediated by other adaptation processes. While this does not preclude an influence of predictive coding models in nociception, it suggests that when the nervous system receives highly precise input, its responses are less susceptible to influence from expectations.</p>","PeriodicalId":16563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7618183/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expectation effects on repetition suppression in nociception.\",\"authors\":\"Lisa-Marie G Pohle, Moritz M Nickel, Birgit Nierula, Markus Ploner, Ulrike Horn, Falk Eippert\",\"doi\":\"10.1152/jn.00359.2025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Repetition suppression, the reduced neural response upon repeated presentation of a stimulus, can be explained by models focussing on bottom-up (i.e. adaptation) or top-down (i.e. expectation) mechanisms. Predictive coding models fall into the latter category and propose that repetitions are expected and therefore elicit smaller prediction error responses. While studies in the visual and auditory domain provide some support for such models, in nociception evidence remains inconclusive, despite the substantial influence expectations exert on pain perception. To assess expectation effects on repetition suppression in nociception, we developed a paradigm in which healthy volunteers received brief CO<sub>2</sub> laser stimuli, while we acquired electroencephalographic (EEG) and peripheral physiological data. Importantly, laser stimuli could be either repeated after one second or not be repeated, with the probability of repetitions manipulated in a block-wise fashion, such that repetitions were either expected or unexpected. We observed repetition suppression in laser-evoked potentials as well as laser-induced gamma band oscillations, but not in laser-induced desynchronisations in the alpha and beta band. Critically, neither these EEG responses, nor the peripheral physiological data showed significant differences between the expectation conditions, with Bayesian analyses mostly providing evidence for an absence of effects. This indicates that repetition suppression to brief nociceptive laser stimuli is not driven by top-down factors, but rather mediated by other adaptation processes. While this does not preclude an influence of predictive coding models in nociception, it suggests that when the nervous system receives highly precise input, its responses are less susceptible to influence from expectations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurophysiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7618183/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00359.2025\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00359.2025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重复抑制,即重复呈现刺激时神经反应的减少,可以通过关注自下而上(即适应)或自上而下(即期望)机制的模型来解释。预测编码模型属于后一类,并提出重复是预期的,因此引起较小的预测误差响应。虽然在视觉和听觉领域的研究为这些模型提供了一些支持,但在伤害感觉方面的证据仍然不确定,尽管预期对疼痛感知产生了重大影响。为了评估期望对伤害感觉中重复抑制的影响,我们建立了一个范式,在该范式中,健康志愿者接受短暂的CO2激光刺激,同时我们获得脑电图(EEG)和外周生理数据。重要的是,激光刺激可以在一秒钟后重复或不重复,重复的概率以块方向的方式操纵,这样重复要么是预期的,要么是意外的。我们观察到激光诱发电位的重复抑制以及激光诱导的伽马波段振荡,但在激光诱导的α和β波段的去同步中没有。关键的是,这些脑电图反应和外周生理数据都没有显示出期望条件之间的显著差异,贝叶斯分析主要提供了没有影响的证据。这表明对短暂伤害性激光刺激的重复抑制不是由自上而下的因素驱动的,而是由其他适应过程介导的。虽然这并不排除预测编码模型对伤害感觉的影响,但它表明,当神经系统接收到高度精确的输入时,其反应不太容易受到预期的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Expectation effects on repetition suppression in nociception.

Repetition suppression, the reduced neural response upon repeated presentation of a stimulus, can be explained by models focussing on bottom-up (i.e. adaptation) or top-down (i.e. expectation) mechanisms. Predictive coding models fall into the latter category and propose that repetitions are expected and therefore elicit smaller prediction error responses. While studies in the visual and auditory domain provide some support for such models, in nociception evidence remains inconclusive, despite the substantial influence expectations exert on pain perception. To assess expectation effects on repetition suppression in nociception, we developed a paradigm in which healthy volunteers received brief CO2 laser stimuli, while we acquired electroencephalographic (EEG) and peripheral physiological data. Importantly, laser stimuli could be either repeated after one second or not be repeated, with the probability of repetitions manipulated in a block-wise fashion, such that repetitions were either expected or unexpected. We observed repetition suppression in laser-evoked potentials as well as laser-induced gamma band oscillations, but not in laser-induced desynchronisations in the alpha and beta band. Critically, neither these EEG responses, nor the peripheral physiological data showed significant differences between the expectation conditions, with Bayesian analyses mostly providing evidence for an absence of effects. This indicates that repetition suppression to brief nociceptive laser stimuli is not driven by top-down factors, but rather mediated by other adaptation processes. While this does not preclude an influence of predictive coding models in nociception, it suggests that when the nervous system receives highly precise input, its responses are less susceptible to influence from expectations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurophysiology
Journal of neurophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
255
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurophysiology publishes original articles on the function of the nervous system. All levels of function are included, from the membrane and cell to systems and behavior. Experimental approaches include molecular neurobiology, cell culture and slice preparations, membrane physiology, developmental neurobiology, functional neuroanatomy, neurochemistry, neuropharmacology, systems electrophysiology, imaging and mapping techniques, and behavioral analysis. Experimental preparations may be invertebrate or vertebrate species, including humans. Theoretical studies are acceptable if they are tied closely to the interpretation of experimental data and elucidate principles of broad interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信