Jeesung Ahn, Lara Foland-Ross, Teddy J Akiki, Leyla Boyar, Isabelle Wydler, Catherine Bostian, Xue Zhang, Hyun-Joon Yang, Andrea Ellsay, Erica Ma, Divya Rajasekharan, Paul Holtzheimer, Kelvin Lim, Michelle Madore, Noah Philip, Olu Ajilore, Jun Ma, Leanne M Williams
{"title":"在精神病学中发展临床可解释的神经影像学生物型。","authors":"Jeesung Ahn, Lara Foland-Ross, Teddy J Akiki, Leyla Boyar, Isabelle Wydler, Catherine Bostian, Xue Zhang, Hyun-Joon Yang, Andrea Ellsay, Erica Ma, Divya Rajasekharan, Paul Holtzheimer, Kelvin Lim, Michelle Madore, Noah Philip, Olu Ajilore, Jun Ma, Leanne M Williams","doi":"10.1016/j.biopsych.2025.08.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite available treatments, major depressive disorder (MDD) remains one of the leading causes of disability across medical conditions. The current symptom-based diagnostic system groups patients with highly heterogeneous presentations, with no biomarkers to guide treatment-akin to diagnosing heart disease solely by chest pain, without imaging to reveal the underlying pathology. Lacking biological guidance, clinicians rely on trial-and-error prescribing. Only 33% of individuals with MDD achieve remission on initial treatments, and most cycle through multiple treatments over an average of seven years. The risk of relapse increases with each treatment failure, rising from 50% to 90%. This critical review synthesizes studies showing how functional MRI (fMRI) can predict treatment outcomes and identify which treatment is most effective for an individual based on their brain circuit profile. We illustrate one such method: a theoretically informed approach that quantifies dysfunction across six large-scale brain circuits, relative to healthy reference norms. The resulting personalized circuit scores serve as predictors of response or failure and as moderators of differential treatment outcomes. Matching treatment to a patient's biotype, defined by their circuit profile, has the potential to double remission rates compared to unmatched treatment. We place this example in the broader context of precision imaging approaches to parsing MDD heterogeneity. We also discuss key challenges, limitations, and future directions for translating fMRI-based tools into clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":8918,"journal":{"name":"Biological Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing Clinically Interpretable Neuroimaging Biotypes in Psychiatry.\",\"authors\":\"Jeesung Ahn, Lara Foland-Ross, Teddy J Akiki, Leyla Boyar, Isabelle Wydler, Catherine Bostian, Xue Zhang, Hyun-Joon Yang, Andrea Ellsay, Erica Ma, Divya Rajasekharan, Paul Holtzheimer, Kelvin Lim, Michelle Madore, Noah Philip, Olu Ajilore, Jun Ma, Leanne M Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.biopsych.2025.08.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite available treatments, major depressive disorder (MDD) remains one of the leading causes of disability across medical conditions. The current symptom-based diagnostic system groups patients with highly heterogeneous presentations, with no biomarkers to guide treatment-akin to diagnosing heart disease solely by chest pain, without imaging to reveal the underlying pathology. Lacking biological guidance, clinicians rely on trial-and-error prescribing. Only 33% of individuals with MDD achieve remission on initial treatments, and most cycle through multiple treatments over an average of seven years. The risk of relapse increases with each treatment failure, rising from 50% to 90%. This critical review synthesizes studies showing how functional MRI (fMRI) can predict treatment outcomes and identify which treatment is most effective for an individual based on their brain circuit profile. We illustrate one such method: a theoretically informed approach that quantifies dysfunction across six large-scale brain circuits, relative to healthy reference norms. The resulting personalized circuit scores serve as predictors of response or failure and as moderators of differential treatment outcomes. Matching treatment to a patient's biotype, defined by their circuit profile, has the potential to double remission rates compared to unmatched treatment. We place this example in the broader context of precision imaging approaches to parsing MDD heterogeneity. We also discuss key challenges, limitations, and future directions for translating fMRI-based tools into clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8918,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2025.08.019\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2025.08.019","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Developing Clinically Interpretable Neuroimaging Biotypes in Psychiatry.
Despite available treatments, major depressive disorder (MDD) remains one of the leading causes of disability across medical conditions. The current symptom-based diagnostic system groups patients with highly heterogeneous presentations, with no biomarkers to guide treatment-akin to diagnosing heart disease solely by chest pain, without imaging to reveal the underlying pathology. Lacking biological guidance, clinicians rely on trial-and-error prescribing. Only 33% of individuals with MDD achieve remission on initial treatments, and most cycle through multiple treatments over an average of seven years. The risk of relapse increases with each treatment failure, rising from 50% to 90%. This critical review synthesizes studies showing how functional MRI (fMRI) can predict treatment outcomes and identify which treatment is most effective for an individual based on their brain circuit profile. We illustrate one such method: a theoretically informed approach that quantifies dysfunction across six large-scale brain circuits, relative to healthy reference norms. The resulting personalized circuit scores serve as predictors of response or failure and as moderators of differential treatment outcomes. Matching treatment to a patient's biotype, defined by their circuit profile, has the potential to double remission rates compared to unmatched treatment. We place this example in the broader context of precision imaging approaches to parsing MDD heterogeneity. We also discuss key challenges, limitations, and future directions for translating fMRI-based tools into clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
Biological Psychiatry is an official journal of the Society of Biological Psychiatry and was established in 1969. It is the first journal in the Biological Psychiatry family, which also includes Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging and Biological Psychiatry: Global Open Science. The Society's main goal is to promote excellence in scientific research and education in the fields related to the nature, causes, mechanisms, and treatments of disorders pertaining to thought, emotion, and behavior. To fulfill this mission, Biological Psychiatry publishes peer-reviewed, rapid-publication articles that present new findings from original basic, translational, and clinical mechanistic research, ultimately advancing our understanding of psychiatric disorders and their treatment. The journal also encourages the submission of reviews and commentaries on current research and topics of interest.