在精神病学中发展临床可解释的神经影像学生物型。

IF 9 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Jeesung Ahn, Lara Foland-Ross, Teddy J Akiki, Leyla Boyar, Isabelle Wydler, Catherine Bostian, Xue Zhang, Hyun-Joon Yang, Andrea Ellsay, Erica Ma, Divya Rajasekharan, Paul Holtzheimer, Kelvin Lim, Michelle Madore, Noah Philip, Olu Ajilore, Jun Ma, Leanne M Williams
{"title":"在精神病学中发展临床可解释的神经影像学生物型。","authors":"Jeesung Ahn, Lara Foland-Ross, Teddy J Akiki, Leyla Boyar, Isabelle Wydler, Catherine Bostian, Xue Zhang, Hyun-Joon Yang, Andrea Ellsay, Erica Ma, Divya Rajasekharan, Paul Holtzheimer, Kelvin Lim, Michelle Madore, Noah Philip, Olu Ajilore, Jun Ma, Leanne M Williams","doi":"10.1016/j.biopsych.2025.08.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite available treatments, major depressive disorder (MDD) remains one of the leading causes of disability across medical conditions. The current symptom-based diagnostic system groups patients with highly heterogeneous presentations, with no biomarkers to guide treatment-akin to diagnosing heart disease solely by chest pain, without imaging to reveal the underlying pathology. Lacking biological guidance, clinicians rely on trial-and-error prescribing. Only 33% of individuals with MDD achieve remission on initial treatments, and most cycle through multiple treatments over an average of seven years. The risk of relapse increases with each treatment failure, rising from 50% to 90%. This critical review synthesizes studies showing how functional MRI (fMRI) can predict treatment outcomes and identify which treatment is most effective for an individual based on their brain circuit profile. We illustrate one such method: a theoretically informed approach that quantifies dysfunction across six large-scale brain circuits, relative to healthy reference norms. The resulting personalized circuit scores serve as predictors of response or failure and as moderators of differential treatment outcomes. Matching treatment to a patient's biotype, defined by their circuit profile, has the potential to double remission rates compared to unmatched treatment. We place this example in the broader context of precision imaging approaches to parsing MDD heterogeneity. We also discuss key challenges, limitations, and future directions for translating fMRI-based tools into clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":8918,"journal":{"name":"Biological Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing Clinically Interpretable Neuroimaging Biotypes in Psychiatry.\",\"authors\":\"Jeesung Ahn, Lara Foland-Ross, Teddy J Akiki, Leyla Boyar, Isabelle Wydler, Catherine Bostian, Xue Zhang, Hyun-Joon Yang, Andrea Ellsay, Erica Ma, Divya Rajasekharan, Paul Holtzheimer, Kelvin Lim, Michelle Madore, Noah Philip, Olu Ajilore, Jun Ma, Leanne M Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.biopsych.2025.08.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite available treatments, major depressive disorder (MDD) remains one of the leading causes of disability across medical conditions. The current symptom-based diagnostic system groups patients with highly heterogeneous presentations, with no biomarkers to guide treatment-akin to diagnosing heart disease solely by chest pain, without imaging to reveal the underlying pathology. Lacking biological guidance, clinicians rely on trial-and-error prescribing. Only 33% of individuals with MDD achieve remission on initial treatments, and most cycle through multiple treatments over an average of seven years. The risk of relapse increases with each treatment failure, rising from 50% to 90%. This critical review synthesizes studies showing how functional MRI (fMRI) can predict treatment outcomes and identify which treatment is most effective for an individual based on their brain circuit profile. We illustrate one such method: a theoretically informed approach that quantifies dysfunction across six large-scale brain circuits, relative to healthy reference norms. The resulting personalized circuit scores serve as predictors of response or failure and as moderators of differential treatment outcomes. Matching treatment to a patient's biotype, defined by their circuit profile, has the potential to double remission rates compared to unmatched treatment. We place this example in the broader context of precision imaging approaches to parsing MDD heterogeneity. We also discuss key challenges, limitations, and future directions for translating fMRI-based tools into clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8918,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2025.08.019\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2025.08.019","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管有现有的治疗方法,重度抑郁症(MDD)仍然是各种医疗条件下导致残疾的主要原因之一。目前基于症状的诊断系统对表现高度异质性的患者进行分组,没有生物标志物指导治疗,类似于仅通过胸痛诊断心脏病,没有影像学显示潜在病理。由于缺乏生物学指导,临床医生依赖于试错处方。在最初的治疗中,只有33%的重度抑郁症患者病情得到缓解,而且大多数人在平均7年的时间里反复接受多次治疗。每次治疗失败,复发的风险都会增加,从50%上升到90%。这篇重要的综述综合了功能性磁共振成像(fMRI)如何预测治疗结果的研究,并根据他们的大脑回路概况确定哪种治疗对个体最有效。我们举例说明了一种这样的方法:一种理论上知情的方法,量化了六个大规模脑回路的功能障碍,相对于健康的参考规范。由此产生的个性化电路分数作为反应或失败的预测因子,并作为差异治疗结果的调节因子。与不匹配的治疗相比,与患者的生物型匹配的治疗(由其电路概况定义)有可能使缓解率加倍。我们把这个例子放在解析MDD异构性的精确成像方法的更广泛的背景中。我们还讨论了将基于fmri的工具转化为临床实践的关键挑战、限制和未来方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing Clinically Interpretable Neuroimaging Biotypes in Psychiatry.

Despite available treatments, major depressive disorder (MDD) remains one of the leading causes of disability across medical conditions. The current symptom-based diagnostic system groups patients with highly heterogeneous presentations, with no biomarkers to guide treatment-akin to diagnosing heart disease solely by chest pain, without imaging to reveal the underlying pathology. Lacking biological guidance, clinicians rely on trial-and-error prescribing. Only 33% of individuals with MDD achieve remission on initial treatments, and most cycle through multiple treatments over an average of seven years. The risk of relapse increases with each treatment failure, rising from 50% to 90%. This critical review synthesizes studies showing how functional MRI (fMRI) can predict treatment outcomes and identify which treatment is most effective for an individual based on their brain circuit profile. We illustrate one such method: a theoretically informed approach that quantifies dysfunction across six large-scale brain circuits, relative to healthy reference norms. The resulting personalized circuit scores serve as predictors of response or failure and as moderators of differential treatment outcomes. Matching treatment to a patient's biotype, defined by their circuit profile, has the potential to double remission rates compared to unmatched treatment. We place this example in the broader context of precision imaging approaches to parsing MDD heterogeneity. We also discuss key challenges, limitations, and future directions for translating fMRI-based tools into clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Psychiatry
Biological Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
18.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
1398
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Biological Psychiatry is an official journal of the Society of Biological Psychiatry and was established in 1969. It is the first journal in the Biological Psychiatry family, which also includes Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging and Biological Psychiatry: Global Open Science. The Society's main goal is to promote excellence in scientific research and education in the fields related to the nature, causes, mechanisms, and treatments of disorders pertaining to thought, emotion, and behavior. To fulfill this mission, Biological Psychiatry publishes peer-reviewed, rapid-publication articles that present new findings from original basic, translational, and clinical mechanistic research, ultimately advancing our understanding of psychiatric disorders and their treatment. The journal also encourages the submission of reviews and commentaries on current research and topics of interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信