{"title":"随着时间的推移,父母和孩子的智能手机使用问题:在两个韩国队列中进行了六年的二代分析","authors":"Xyle Ku","doi":"10.1016/j.addbeh.2025.108477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Emerging evidence suggests a positive link between parental and child problematic smartphone use (PSU), yet the direction and reciprocity of this relationship over time remain unclear. Here, we address this gap by examining six years (2018–2023) of PSU data from 4,086 parent–child dyads in South Korea, comprising two cohorts: a child cohort (1,984 dyads; mean child age = 11.00, 51.1 % female; mean parent age = 42.17, 95.0 % mothers) and an adolescent cohort (2,102 dyads; mean child age = 14.00, 46.6 % female; mean parent age = 44.32, 94.6 % mothers). Random-intercept cross-lagged panel models (RI-CLPMs) revealed consistent patterns across both cohorts. At the between-dyad level, parental and child PSU covaried, such that children of parents with higher PSU also reported higher PSU. At the within-dyad level, their PSU levels co-fluctuated over time; that is, in years when parents’ PSU rose above their typical level, their children’s PSU rose as well. However, no significant cross-lagged effects emerged, indicating that increases in parental PSU did not predict subsequent changes in child PSU and vice versa. Together, these findings suggest that longitudinal co-fluctuation patterns in PSU, rather than causal transmission, exist within a shared family digital ecology, thereby highlighting family-level dynamics in understanding PSU.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7155,"journal":{"name":"Addictive behaviors","volume":"172 ","pages":"Article 108477"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parental and child problematic smartphone use over time: Six-year within-dyad analysis in two Korean cohorts\",\"authors\":\"Xyle Ku\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.addbeh.2025.108477\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Emerging evidence suggests a positive link between parental and child problematic smartphone use (PSU), yet the direction and reciprocity of this relationship over time remain unclear. Here, we address this gap by examining six years (2018–2023) of PSU data from 4,086 parent–child dyads in South Korea, comprising two cohorts: a child cohort (1,984 dyads; mean child age = 11.00, 51.1 % female; mean parent age = 42.17, 95.0 % mothers) and an adolescent cohort (2,102 dyads; mean child age = 14.00, 46.6 % female; mean parent age = 44.32, 94.6 % mothers). Random-intercept cross-lagged panel models (RI-CLPMs) revealed consistent patterns across both cohorts. At the between-dyad level, parental and child PSU covaried, such that children of parents with higher PSU also reported higher PSU. At the within-dyad level, their PSU levels co-fluctuated over time; that is, in years when parents’ PSU rose above their typical level, their children’s PSU rose as well. However, no significant cross-lagged effects emerged, indicating that increases in parental PSU did not predict subsequent changes in child PSU and vice versa. Together, these findings suggest that longitudinal co-fluctuation patterns in PSU, rather than causal transmission, exist within a shared family digital ecology, thereby highlighting family-level dynamics in understanding PSU.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Addictive behaviors\",\"volume\":\"172 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108477\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Addictive behaviors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306460325002382\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addictive behaviors","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306460325002382","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Parental and child problematic smartphone use over time: Six-year within-dyad analysis in two Korean cohorts
Emerging evidence suggests a positive link between parental and child problematic smartphone use (PSU), yet the direction and reciprocity of this relationship over time remain unclear. Here, we address this gap by examining six years (2018–2023) of PSU data from 4,086 parent–child dyads in South Korea, comprising two cohorts: a child cohort (1,984 dyads; mean child age = 11.00, 51.1 % female; mean parent age = 42.17, 95.0 % mothers) and an adolescent cohort (2,102 dyads; mean child age = 14.00, 46.6 % female; mean parent age = 44.32, 94.6 % mothers). Random-intercept cross-lagged panel models (RI-CLPMs) revealed consistent patterns across both cohorts. At the between-dyad level, parental and child PSU covaried, such that children of parents with higher PSU also reported higher PSU. At the within-dyad level, their PSU levels co-fluctuated over time; that is, in years when parents’ PSU rose above their typical level, their children’s PSU rose as well. However, no significant cross-lagged effects emerged, indicating that increases in parental PSU did not predict subsequent changes in child PSU and vice versa. Together, these findings suggest that longitudinal co-fluctuation patterns in PSU, rather than causal transmission, exist within a shared family digital ecology, thereby highlighting family-level dynamics in understanding PSU.
期刊介绍:
Addictive Behaviors is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing high quality human research on addictive behaviors and disorders since 1975. The journal accepts submissions of full-length papers and short communications on substance-related addictions such as the abuse of alcohol, drugs and nicotine, and behavioral addictions involving gambling and technology. We primarily publish behavioral and psychosocial research but our articles span the fields of psychology, sociology, psychiatry, epidemiology, social policy, medicine, pharmacology and neuroscience. While theoretical orientations are diverse, the emphasis of the journal is primarily empirical. That is, sound experimental design combined with valid, reliable assessment and evaluation procedures are a requisite for acceptance. However, innovative and empirically oriented case studies that might encourage new lines of inquiry are accepted as well. Studies that clearly contribute to current knowledge of etiology, prevention, social policy or treatment are given priority. Scholarly commentaries on topical issues, systematic reviews, and mini reviews are encouraged. We especially welcome multimedia papers that incorporate video or audio components to better display methodology or findings.
Studies can also be submitted to Addictive Behaviors? companion title, the open access journal Addictive Behaviors Reports, which has a particular interest in ''non-traditional'', innovative and empirically-oriented research such as negative/null data papers, replication studies, case reports on novel treatments, and cross-cultural research.