促进发展中国家患者的姑息治疗:全球视角和未来建议。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of palliative medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-05 DOI:10.1177/10966218251376298
Jeannine M Brant, Lili Tang, Sophia Nestoros, Mohamed Hablas, Tamar Rukhadze, Marisol Bustamante, Salma A Al-Hadad, Seema R Rao, Dingle Spence, Mohammad Al-Qadire, Gulnara Kunirova, Islam Salikhanov, John Weru, Michel N Daher, Maricela S Bacerril, Asmaa El-Azhari, Emmanuel Luyirica, Mohamad Khleif, Aleksandra Kotlinska-Lemieszek, Daniela Mosoiu, Rejin Kebudi, Gabriela P Alvarez, Maryam Rassouli, Michael Silbermann
{"title":"促进发展中国家患者的姑息治疗:全球视角和未来建议。","authors":"Jeannine M Brant, Lili Tang, Sophia Nestoros, Mohamed Hablas, Tamar Rukhadze, Marisol Bustamante, Salma A Al-Hadad, Seema R Rao, Dingle Spence, Mohammad Al-Qadire, Gulnara Kunirova, Islam Salikhanov, John Weru, Michel N Daher, Maricela S Bacerril, Asmaa El-Azhari, Emmanuel Luyirica, Mohamad Khleif, Aleksandra Kotlinska-Lemieszek, Daniela Mosoiu, Rejin Kebudi, Gabriela P Alvarez, Maryam Rassouli, Michael Silbermann","doi":"10.1177/10966218251376298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Despite a plethora of evidence available on the benefits of palliative care (PC), it is estimated that only about 14% of those living in low- to middle-income countries (LMIC) or developing countries have access to PC. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> To globally examine PC expert perspectives regarding PC infrastructure and resources within each country, drug and opioid availability to provide PC, and workforce and educational issues. <b><i>Design:</i></b> Descriptive, open-ended survey seeking first-hand qualitative perspectives. <b><i>Setting/Subjects:</i></b> PC experts from 21 developing countries representing 5 continents around the world. <b><i>Measurements:</i></b> Qualitative narratives and discussions with PC experts. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The summaries inform four key recommendations for future progress of PC in developing countries: (1) PC infrastructure should increase accessibility to both urban and rural areas; (2) increasing medication and nonpharmacologic approaches for symptoms is essential; (3) interdisciplinary education should continue to expand and include scholarships, PC certifications, and advanced education; and 4) future research with developing countries is desperately needed to advance care and progress. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Considerable PC progress has been accomplished; however, significant gaps remain. This report can be used to discuss PC capacity building within a country. It could serve as an important document while negotiating with authorities and Ministries of Health about expanding PC infrastructure, especially in rural areas. Finally, PC champions can use this report to advocate for increased opioid availability to promote comfort; in particular, increased availability of oral opioids is essential, so that patients can die comfortably at home.</p>","PeriodicalId":16656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1155-1169"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Promoting Palliative Care to Patients in Developing Countries-Global Perspectives and Future Recommendations.\",\"authors\":\"Jeannine M Brant, Lili Tang, Sophia Nestoros, Mohamed Hablas, Tamar Rukhadze, Marisol Bustamante, Salma A Al-Hadad, Seema R Rao, Dingle Spence, Mohammad Al-Qadire, Gulnara Kunirova, Islam Salikhanov, John Weru, Michel N Daher, Maricela S Bacerril, Asmaa El-Azhari, Emmanuel Luyirica, Mohamad Khleif, Aleksandra Kotlinska-Lemieszek, Daniela Mosoiu, Rejin Kebudi, Gabriela P Alvarez, Maryam Rassouli, Michael Silbermann\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10966218251376298\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Despite a plethora of evidence available on the benefits of palliative care (PC), it is estimated that only about 14% of those living in low- to middle-income countries (LMIC) or developing countries have access to PC. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> To globally examine PC expert perspectives regarding PC infrastructure and resources within each country, drug and opioid availability to provide PC, and workforce and educational issues. <b><i>Design:</i></b> Descriptive, open-ended survey seeking first-hand qualitative perspectives. <b><i>Setting/Subjects:</i></b> PC experts from 21 developing countries representing 5 continents around the world. <b><i>Measurements:</i></b> Qualitative narratives and discussions with PC experts. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The summaries inform four key recommendations for future progress of PC in developing countries: (1) PC infrastructure should increase accessibility to both urban and rural areas; (2) increasing medication and nonpharmacologic approaches for symptoms is essential; (3) interdisciplinary education should continue to expand and include scholarships, PC certifications, and advanced education; and 4) future research with developing countries is desperately needed to advance care and progress. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Considerable PC progress has been accomplished; however, significant gaps remain. This report can be used to discuss PC capacity building within a country. It could serve as an important document while negotiating with authorities and Ministries of Health about expanding PC infrastructure, especially in rural areas. Finally, PC champions can use this report to advocate for increased opioid availability to promote comfort; in particular, increased availability of oral opioids is essential, so that patients can die comfortably at home.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of palliative medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1155-1169\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of palliative medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10966218251376298\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10966218251376298","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管有大量证据表明姑息治疗(PC)的益处,但据估计,生活在低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)或发展中国家的人中只有约14%能够获得姑息治疗。目的:在全球范围内考察个人电脑专家对每个国家的个人电脑基础设施和资源、提供个人电脑的药物和阿片类药物的可用性、劳动力和教育问题的看法。设计:描述性的开放式调查,寻求第一手的定性观点。背景/主题:来自全球5大洲21个发展中国家的PC专家。测量:定性叙述和讨论与PC专家。结果:总结为发展中国家PC的未来发展提供了四项关键建议:(1)PC基础设施应增加城市和农村地区的可及性;(2)增加药物治疗和非药物治疗是必要的;(3)继续扩大跨学科教育,包括奖学金、PC认证和高等教育;4)未来迫切需要与发展中国家进行研究,以促进护理和进步。结论:PC取得了相当大的进展;然而,巨大的差距仍然存在。这份报告可以用来讨论一个国家的个人电脑能力建设。在与当局和卫生部就扩大个人电脑基础设施,特别是在农村地区进行谈判时,它可以作为一份重要文件。最后,PC冠军可以利用这份报告来倡导增加阿片类药物的可用性,以促进舒适感;特别是,增加口服阿片类药物的可得性至关重要,这样患者才能在家中舒适地死去。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Promoting Palliative Care to Patients in Developing Countries-Global Perspectives and Future Recommendations.

Background: Despite a plethora of evidence available on the benefits of palliative care (PC), it is estimated that only about 14% of those living in low- to middle-income countries (LMIC) or developing countries have access to PC. Objective: To globally examine PC expert perspectives regarding PC infrastructure and resources within each country, drug and opioid availability to provide PC, and workforce and educational issues. Design: Descriptive, open-ended survey seeking first-hand qualitative perspectives. Setting/Subjects: PC experts from 21 developing countries representing 5 continents around the world. Measurements: Qualitative narratives and discussions with PC experts. Results: The summaries inform four key recommendations for future progress of PC in developing countries: (1) PC infrastructure should increase accessibility to both urban and rural areas; (2) increasing medication and nonpharmacologic approaches for symptoms is essential; (3) interdisciplinary education should continue to expand and include scholarships, PC certifications, and advanced education; and 4) future research with developing countries is desperately needed to advance care and progress. Conclusions: Considerable PC progress has been accomplished; however, significant gaps remain. This report can be used to discuss PC capacity building within a country. It could serve as an important document while negotiating with authorities and Ministries of Health about expanding PC infrastructure, especially in rural areas. Finally, PC champions can use this report to advocate for increased opioid availability to promote comfort; in particular, increased availability of oral opioids is essential, so that patients can die comfortably at home.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of palliative medicine
Journal of palliative medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
345
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Palliative Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed journal covering medical, psychosocial, policy, and legal issues in end-of-life care and relief of suffering for patients with intractable pain. The Journal presents essential information for professionals in hospice/palliative medicine, focusing on improving quality of life for patients and their families, and the latest developments in drug and non-drug treatments. The companion biweekly eNewsletter, Briefings in Palliative Medicine, delivers the latest breaking news and information to keep clinicians and health care providers continuously updated.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信