视角:多元文化人群的营养研究与规划:固定质量可变类型(FQVT)饮食干预。

IF 9.2
David L Katz, Christopher D Gardner
{"title":"视角:多元文化人群的营养研究与规划:固定质量可变类型(FQVT)饮食干预。","authors":"David L Katz, Christopher D Gardner","doi":"10.1016/j.advnut.2025.100505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The sine qua non of intervention studies in general, and randomized controlled trials in particular, is to define and isolate an exposure of interest that defines the intervention and distinguishes between groups. The isolation of a presumptive cause is a prerequisite to the confident attribution of given effects. In the context of dietary intervention studies, this has historically translated into a unitary intervention diet type, no matter the diversity of preferences, tastes, upbringings, ethnicities, and cultures represented in a given study cohort. To the extent such diversities have been constrained to achieve this aim, generalizability (external validity) has been diminished. To the extent such diversities have been ignored, inattention to them has likely shifted results toward the null and compromised adherence over time. These same liabilities pertain to food service projects and public health nutrition, notably the food-as-medicine movement. We propose a remedy to these issues and an update to the formula for dietary intervention research (and service) that accommodates a multicultural society: the fixed-quality, variable-type (FQVT) nutrition intervention. This method standardizes the objective measure of diet quality and incorporates fixed tolerances for nutrients of particular interest, while allowing for a range of diet types responsive to the variable preferences of study participants/population members. We describe the application of tools to facilitate this methodological innovation, enumerate the expected advantages, and characterize means of empirical testing. We submit the FQVT method as a promising, testable advance in the evolution of clinical nutrition research and food-is/as-medicine programming.</p>","PeriodicalId":72101,"journal":{"name":"Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":"100505"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nutrition Research and Programming in Multicultural Populations: The Fixed-Quality Variable-Type Dietary Intervention.\",\"authors\":\"David L Katz, Christopher D Gardner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.advnut.2025.100505\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The sine qua non of intervention studies in general, and randomized controlled trials in particular, is to define and isolate an exposure of interest that defines the intervention and distinguishes between groups. The isolation of a presumptive cause is a prerequisite to the confident attribution of given effects. In the context of dietary intervention studies, this has historically translated into a unitary intervention diet type, no matter the diversity of preferences, tastes, upbringings, ethnicities, and cultures represented in a given study cohort. To the extent such diversities have been constrained to achieve this aim, generalizability (external validity) has been diminished. To the extent such diversities have been ignored, inattention to them has likely shifted results toward the null and compromised adherence over time. These same liabilities pertain to food service projects and public health nutrition, notably the food-as-medicine movement. We propose a remedy to these issues and an update to the formula for dietary intervention research (and service) that accommodates a multicultural society: the fixed-quality, variable-type (FQVT) nutrition intervention. This method standardizes the objective measure of diet quality and incorporates fixed tolerances for nutrients of particular interest, while allowing for a range of diet types responsive to the variable preferences of study participants/population members. We describe the application of tools to facilitate this methodological innovation, enumerate the expected advantages, and characterize means of empirical testing. We submit the FQVT method as a promising, testable advance in the evolution of clinical nutrition research and food-is/as-medicine programming.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"100505\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advnut.2025.100505\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advnut.2025.100505","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一般来说,干预研究,特别是随机对照试验的必要条件是定义和隔离感兴趣的暴露,以定义干预并区分各组。孤立一个假定的原因是对给定结果有信心归因的先决条件。在饮食干预研究的背景下,这在历史上已经转化为单一的干预饮食类型,而不管在给定的研究队列中所代表的偏好、口味、教养、种族和文化的多样性。在某种程度上,为了达到这一目的,这种多样性受到限制,概括性(外部有效性)已被削弱。在某种程度上,这种多样性被忽视了,对它们的忽视可能会使结果趋于零,并随着时间的推移损害了依从性。这些责任同样适用于食品服务项目和公共卫生营养,特别是食品即药物运动。我们提出了解决这些问题的方法,并对饮食干预研究(和服务)的公式进行了更新,以适应多元文化社会:固定质量,可变类型(FQVT)营养干预。该方法标准化了饮食质量的客观衡量标准,并结合了对特别感兴趣的营养素的固定耐受性,同时允许一系列饮食类型响应研究参与者/人群成员的可变偏好。我们描述了促进这种方法创新的工具的应用,列举了预期的优势,并描述了经验检验的手段。我们认为FQVT方法在临床营养研究和食品即医学规划的发展中是一个有前途的、可测试的进步。意义说明:本文介绍了用于膳食干预研究和规划的固定质量可变型(FQVT)结构。FQVT方法的特别新颖之处在于,它有机会在单个研究或项目中包含任何给定的多个(即,不仅仅是两个或几个)饮食模式,在n-of-1的水平上进行个性化,但在预先指定的客观测量饮食质量的层次内进行标准化,并在相关和感兴趣的营养范围内进行匹配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nutrition Research and Programming in Multicultural Populations: The Fixed-Quality Variable-Type Dietary Intervention.

The sine qua non of intervention studies in general, and randomized controlled trials in particular, is to define and isolate an exposure of interest that defines the intervention and distinguishes between groups. The isolation of a presumptive cause is a prerequisite to the confident attribution of given effects. In the context of dietary intervention studies, this has historically translated into a unitary intervention diet type, no matter the diversity of preferences, tastes, upbringings, ethnicities, and cultures represented in a given study cohort. To the extent such diversities have been constrained to achieve this aim, generalizability (external validity) has been diminished. To the extent such diversities have been ignored, inattention to them has likely shifted results toward the null and compromised adherence over time. These same liabilities pertain to food service projects and public health nutrition, notably the food-as-medicine movement. We propose a remedy to these issues and an update to the formula for dietary intervention research (and service) that accommodates a multicultural society: the fixed-quality, variable-type (FQVT) nutrition intervention. This method standardizes the objective measure of diet quality and incorporates fixed tolerances for nutrients of particular interest, while allowing for a range of diet types responsive to the variable preferences of study participants/population members. We describe the application of tools to facilitate this methodological innovation, enumerate the expected advantages, and characterize means of empirical testing. We submit the FQVT method as a promising, testable advance in the evolution of clinical nutrition research and food-is/as-medicine programming.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信