{"title":"汉语英语写作中的性别偏见:基于语料库的中性代词研究","authors":"Hanzhong Sun , Wei Cheng , Hye Pae , Li Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.linged.2025.101464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With the global shift towards gender-inclusive language, there has been a renewed interest in the use of epicene pronouns by learners of English. This study examined the use of three epicene pronouns—generic <em>he, he or she</em>, and singular <em>they</em>—among Chinese learners of English as a foreign language (EFL), focusing on variations across antecedent types and semantic contexts. Drawing on a 9.4-million-word learner corpus comprising 52,854 English essays written by Chinese university students in the 2010s, we extracted 914 instances of epicene pronouns referring to the non-gendered noun <em>person</em>. All instances were manually coded for antecedent type (definite, indefinite, and quantificational noun phrases) and semantic context (positive, neutral, and negative). Results showed that generic <em>he</em> was used the most frequently, followed by singular <em>they</em> and then <em>he or she</em>, with notable variations across the two variables analyzed. Specifically, singular <em>they</em> was more commonly used with quantificational antecedents (e.g., <em>every person</em>), whereas generic <em>he</em> predominated with indefinite noun phrases (e.g., <em>a person</em>). Moreover, singular <em>they</em> appeared more often in positive than negative contexts, while generic <em>he</em> showed the reverse pattern. Overall, these findings provide updated insights into how Chinese EFL learners use epicene pronouns, emphasizing how their linguistic and sociocultural backgrounds can influence how they use them. Pedagogical implications are discussed, centering on how to promote inclusive language practices in EFL instruction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47468,"journal":{"name":"Linguistics and Education","volume":"89 ","pages":"Article 101464"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender bias in Chinese EFL writing: A corpus-based study of epicene pronouns\",\"authors\":\"Hanzhong Sun , Wei Cheng , Hye Pae , Li Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.linged.2025.101464\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>With the global shift towards gender-inclusive language, there has been a renewed interest in the use of epicene pronouns by learners of English. This study examined the use of three epicene pronouns—generic <em>he, he or she</em>, and singular <em>they</em>—among Chinese learners of English as a foreign language (EFL), focusing on variations across antecedent types and semantic contexts. Drawing on a 9.4-million-word learner corpus comprising 52,854 English essays written by Chinese university students in the 2010s, we extracted 914 instances of epicene pronouns referring to the non-gendered noun <em>person</em>. All instances were manually coded for antecedent type (definite, indefinite, and quantificational noun phrases) and semantic context (positive, neutral, and negative). Results showed that generic <em>he</em> was used the most frequently, followed by singular <em>they</em> and then <em>he or she</em>, with notable variations across the two variables analyzed. Specifically, singular <em>they</em> was more commonly used with quantificational antecedents (e.g., <em>every person</em>), whereas generic <em>he</em> predominated with indefinite noun phrases (e.g., <em>a person</em>). Moreover, singular <em>they</em> appeared more often in positive than negative contexts, while generic <em>he</em> showed the reverse pattern. Overall, these findings provide updated insights into how Chinese EFL learners use epicene pronouns, emphasizing how their linguistic and sociocultural backgrounds can influence how they use them. Pedagogical implications are discussed, centering on how to promote inclusive language practices in EFL instruction.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistics and Education\",\"volume\":\"89 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101464\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistics and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0898589825000816\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistics and Education","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0898589825000816","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Gender bias in Chinese EFL writing: A corpus-based study of epicene pronouns
With the global shift towards gender-inclusive language, there has been a renewed interest in the use of epicene pronouns by learners of English. This study examined the use of three epicene pronouns—generic he, he or she, and singular they—among Chinese learners of English as a foreign language (EFL), focusing on variations across antecedent types and semantic contexts. Drawing on a 9.4-million-word learner corpus comprising 52,854 English essays written by Chinese university students in the 2010s, we extracted 914 instances of epicene pronouns referring to the non-gendered noun person. All instances were manually coded for antecedent type (definite, indefinite, and quantificational noun phrases) and semantic context (positive, neutral, and negative). Results showed that generic he was used the most frequently, followed by singular they and then he or she, with notable variations across the two variables analyzed. Specifically, singular they was more commonly used with quantificational antecedents (e.g., every person), whereas generic he predominated with indefinite noun phrases (e.g., a person). Moreover, singular they appeared more often in positive than negative contexts, while generic he showed the reverse pattern. Overall, these findings provide updated insights into how Chinese EFL learners use epicene pronouns, emphasizing how their linguistic and sociocultural backgrounds can influence how they use them. Pedagogical implications are discussed, centering on how to promote inclusive language practices in EFL instruction.
期刊介绍:
Linguistics and Education encourages submissions that apply theory and method from all areas of linguistics to the study of education. Areas of linguistic study include, but are not limited to: text/corpus linguistics, sociolinguistics, functional grammar, discourse analysis, critical discourse analysis, conversational analysis, linguistic anthropology/ethnography, language acquisition, language socialization, narrative studies, gesture/ sign /visual forms of communication, cognitive linguistics, literacy studies, language policy, and language ideology.