高危子宫内膜癌女性(PORTEC-3)的辅助放化疗与单独放疗:一项随机3期试验的10年临床结果和分子分类事后分析

Cathalijne C B Post, Stephanie M de Boer, Melanie E Powell, Linda Mileshkin, Dionyssios Katsaros, Paul Bessette, Alexandra Leary, Petronella B Ottevanger, Mary McCormack, Pearly Khaw, Romerai D'Amico, Anthony Fyles, Cyrus Chargari, Henry C Kitchener, Viet Do, Andrea Lissoni, Diane Provencher, Catherine Genestie, Hans W Nijman, Karen Whitmarsh, Carien L Creutzberg
{"title":"高危子宫内膜癌女性(PORTEC-3)的辅助放化疗与单独放疗:一项随机3期试验的10年临床结果和分子分类事后分析","authors":"Cathalijne C B Post, Stephanie M de Boer, Melanie E Powell, Linda Mileshkin, Dionyssios Katsaros, Paul Bessette, Alexandra Leary, Petronella B Ottevanger, Mary McCormack, Pearly Khaw, Romerai D'Amico, Anthony Fyles, Cyrus Chargari, Henry C Kitchener, Viet Do, Andrea Lissoni, Diane Provencher, Catherine Genestie, Hans W Nijman, Karen Whitmarsh, Carien L Creutzberg","doi":"10.1016/s1470-2045(25)00379-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background</h3>The PORTEC-3 trial investigated the benefit of chemoradiotherapy versus pelvic radiotherapy alone for women with high-risk endometrial cancer. We present the preplanned long-term analysis of the randomised PORTEC-3 trial with a post-hoc analysis including molecular classification of the tumours.<h3>Methods</h3>PORTEC-3 was an open-label, multicentre, randomised, international phase 3 trial. Women were eligible if they had high-risk endometrial cancer (either International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 stage I, grade 3, with deep myometrial invasion and/or lymphovascular space invasion; stage II–III; or stage I–III with serous or clear-cell histology), were aged 18 years or older, and had a WHO performance score of 0–2. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive pelvic radiotherapy (48·6 Gy in 1·8 Gy fractions) or chemoradiotherapy (radiotherapy combined with two cycles of cisplatin 50 mg/m<sup>2</sup> intravenously in weeks one and four, followed by four cycles of carboplatin area-under-the-curve 5 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m<sup>2</sup> intravenously at 3-week intervals). Randomisation was done by use of biased-coin minimisation with stratification for participating centre, lymphadenectomy, stage, and histological type. We report the primary outcomes of overall survival and recurrence-free survival at 10 years. We also report primary outcomes by molecular subgroup in a post-hoc analysis. Survival was analysed in the intention-to-treat population. The study is registered with <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg aria-label=\"Opens in new window\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"20\" viewbox=\"0 0 8 8\"><path d=\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\"></path></svg></span> (<span><span>NCT00411138</span><svg aria-label=\"Opens in new window\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"20\" viewbox=\"0 0 8 8\"><path d=\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\"></path></svg></span>) and is now complete.<h3>Findings</h3>Between Nov 23, 2006, and Dec 20, 2013, 660 eligible and evaluable patients recruited at 103 centres in six clinical trial groups across seven countries were randomly assigned to chemoradiotherapy (n=330) or radiotherapy alone (n=330). Median follow-up was 10·1 years (IQR 9·8–11·0). Estimated 10-year overall survival was 74·4% (95% CI 69·8–79·4) in the chemoradiotherapy group and 67·3% (62·3–72·7) in the radiotherapy group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·73 [95% CI 0·54–0·97], p=0·032), and 10-year recurrence-free survival was 72·8% (67·2–77·6) versus 67·4% (61·7–72·4; adjusted HR 0·74 [95% CI 0·56–0·98], p=0·034). Molecular analysis was available for 411 (62%) patients (210 [64%] of 330 patients in the chemoradiotherapy group and 201 [61%] of 330 patients in the radiotherapy group), whose characteristics were similar to the overall trial population. Post-hoc analysis by molecular class showed that, for women with p53 abnormal tumours, 10-year overall survival was 52·7% (95% CI 40·8–68·1) with chemoradiotherapy versus 36·6% (25·0 to 53·7) with radiotherapy alone (adjusted HR 0·52 [95% CI 0·30–0·91], p=0·021); 10-year recurrence-free survival was 52·6% (95% CI 38·3 to 65·0) versus 37·0% (95% CI 23·7 to 50·2; HR 0·42 [95% CI 0·24 to 0·74], p=0·0027). MMRd and POLEmut cancers did not seem to benefit from chemoradiotherapy over radiotherapy alone, whereas the effects for NSMP cancers were modulated by oestrogen-receptor status.<h3>Interpretation</h3>10-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival were improved for patients with high-risk endometrial cancer treated with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone, with most clinically relevant benefit suggested for p53 abnormal cancers.<h3>Funding</h3>Dutch Cancer Society, Cancer Research UK, National Health and Medical Research Council Australia, Cancer Australia, Italian Medicines Agency, and the Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute.","PeriodicalId":22865,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Oncology","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): 10-year clinical outcomes and post-hoc analysis by molecular classification from a randomised phase 3 trial\",\"authors\":\"Cathalijne C B Post, Stephanie M de Boer, Melanie E Powell, Linda Mileshkin, Dionyssios Katsaros, Paul Bessette, Alexandra Leary, Petronella B Ottevanger, Mary McCormack, Pearly Khaw, Romerai D'Amico, Anthony Fyles, Cyrus Chargari, Henry C Kitchener, Viet Do, Andrea Lissoni, Diane Provencher, Catherine Genestie, Hans W Nijman, Karen Whitmarsh, Carien L Creutzberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/s1470-2045(25)00379-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Background</h3>The PORTEC-3 trial investigated the benefit of chemoradiotherapy versus pelvic radiotherapy alone for women with high-risk endometrial cancer. We present the preplanned long-term analysis of the randomised PORTEC-3 trial with a post-hoc analysis including molecular classification of the tumours.<h3>Methods</h3>PORTEC-3 was an open-label, multicentre, randomised, international phase 3 trial. Women were eligible if they had high-risk endometrial cancer (either International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 stage I, grade 3, with deep myometrial invasion and/or lymphovascular space invasion; stage II–III; or stage I–III with serous or clear-cell histology), were aged 18 years or older, and had a WHO performance score of 0–2. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive pelvic radiotherapy (48·6 Gy in 1·8 Gy fractions) or chemoradiotherapy (radiotherapy combined with two cycles of cisplatin 50 mg/m<sup>2</sup> intravenously in weeks one and four, followed by four cycles of carboplatin area-under-the-curve 5 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m<sup>2</sup> intravenously at 3-week intervals). Randomisation was done by use of biased-coin minimisation with stratification for participating centre, lymphadenectomy, stage, and histological type. We report the primary outcomes of overall survival and recurrence-free survival at 10 years. We also report primary outcomes by molecular subgroup in a post-hoc analysis. Survival was analysed in the intention-to-treat population. The study is registered with <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg aria-label=\\\"Opens in new window\\\" focusable=\\\"false\\\" height=\\\"20\\\" viewbox=\\\"0 0 8 8\\\"><path d=\\\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\\\"></path></svg></span> (<span><span>NCT00411138</span><svg aria-label=\\\"Opens in new window\\\" focusable=\\\"false\\\" height=\\\"20\\\" viewbox=\\\"0 0 8 8\\\"><path d=\\\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\\\"></path></svg></span>) and is now complete.<h3>Findings</h3>Between Nov 23, 2006, and Dec 20, 2013, 660 eligible and evaluable patients recruited at 103 centres in six clinical trial groups across seven countries were randomly assigned to chemoradiotherapy (n=330) or radiotherapy alone (n=330). Median follow-up was 10·1 years (IQR 9·8–11·0). Estimated 10-year overall survival was 74·4% (95% CI 69·8–79·4) in the chemoradiotherapy group and 67·3% (62·3–72·7) in the radiotherapy group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·73 [95% CI 0·54–0·97], p=0·032), and 10-year recurrence-free survival was 72·8% (67·2–77·6) versus 67·4% (61·7–72·4; adjusted HR 0·74 [95% CI 0·56–0·98], p=0·034). Molecular analysis was available for 411 (62%) patients (210 [64%] of 330 patients in the chemoradiotherapy group and 201 [61%] of 330 patients in the radiotherapy group), whose characteristics were similar to the overall trial population. Post-hoc analysis by molecular class showed that, for women with p53 abnormal tumours, 10-year overall survival was 52·7% (95% CI 40·8–68·1) with chemoradiotherapy versus 36·6% (25·0 to 53·7) with radiotherapy alone (adjusted HR 0·52 [95% CI 0·30–0·91], p=0·021); 10-year recurrence-free survival was 52·6% (95% CI 38·3 to 65·0) versus 37·0% (95% CI 23·7 to 50·2; HR 0·42 [95% CI 0·24 to 0·74], p=0·0027). MMRd and POLEmut cancers did not seem to benefit from chemoradiotherapy over radiotherapy alone, whereas the effects for NSMP cancers were modulated by oestrogen-receptor status.<h3>Interpretation</h3>10-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival were improved for patients with high-risk endometrial cancer treated with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone, with most clinically relevant benefit suggested for p53 abnormal cancers.<h3>Funding</h3>Dutch Cancer Society, Cancer Research UK, National Health and Medical Research Council Australia, Cancer Australia, Italian Medicines Agency, and the Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Lancet Oncology\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Lancet Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(25)00379-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(25)00379-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

PORTEC-3试验研究了放化疗与盆腔放疗对高危子宫内膜癌患者的益处。我们提出了预先计划的随机PORTEC-3试验的长期分析,并进行了包括肿瘤分子分类的事后分析。sportec -3是一项开放标签、多中心、随机、国际3期试验。如果女性患有高危子宫内膜癌(2009年国际妇产科联合会I期,3级,深部肌层浸润和/或淋巴血管间隙浸润;II-III期;或I - iii期,浆液或透明细胞组织学),年龄在18岁或以上,并且WHO表现评分为0-2,则符合条件。参与者被随机分配(1:1)接受盆腔放疗(48.6 Gy / 1.8 Gy)或放化疗(放疗联合2周期顺铂50 mg/m2静脉注射,在第1周和第4周,随后4周期卡铂曲线下面积5和紫杉醇175 mg/m2静脉注射,间隔3周)。随机化采用偏置硬币最小化法,并对参与中心、淋巴结切除术、分期和组织学类型进行分层。我们报告了10年总生存期和无复发生存期的主要结局。我们还在事后分析中报告了分子亚组的主要结果。分析意向治疗人群的生存率。该研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT00411138),现已完成。在2006年11月23日至2013年12月20日期间,从7个国家的6个临床试验组的103个中心招募了660名符合条件且可评估的患者,随机分配到放化疗组(n=330)或单独放疗组(n=330)。中位随访时间为10.1年(IQR为9.8 ~ 11.0)。放化疗组和放疗组的10年总生存率分别为71.4% (95% CI为69.8 ~ 79.4)和67.3%(62.3 ~ 72.7)(校正风险比[HR] 0.73 [95% CI 0.54 ~ 0.97], p= 0.032), 10年无复发生存率分别为72.8%(67.2 ~ 77.6)和67.4%(61.7 ~ 72.4),校正风险比为0.74 [95% CI 0.56 ~ 0.98], p= 0.034)。411例(62%)患者(330例放化疗组210例[64%],330例放疗组201例[61%])可进行分子分析,其特征与总体试验人群相似。分子分类后分析显示,对于患有p53异常肿瘤的女性,放化疗的10年总生存率为52.7% (95% CI 40.8 - 68.1),而单纯放疗的10年总生存率为36.6%(25.0 - 53.7)(调整后危险度0.52 [95% CI 0.30 - 0.91], p= 0.021);10年无复发生存率分别为52.6% (95% CI 38.3 ~ 65.0)和37.0% (95% CI 23.7 ~ 50.2; HR 0.42 [95% CI 0.24 ~ 0.74], p= 0.0027)。MMRd和POLEmut癌症似乎并没有从放化疗中获益,而对NSMP癌症的效果则受到雌激素受体状态的调节。结论:与单纯放疗相比,接受辅助放化疗的高危子宫内膜癌患者的10年总生存率和无复发生存率均有提高,其中p53异常癌的获益最多。资助:荷兰癌症协会、英国癌症研究所、澳大利亚国家健康和医学研究委员会、澳大利亚癌症协会、意大利药品管理局和加拿大癌症协会研究所。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): 10-year clinical outcomes and post-hoc analysis by molecular classification from a randomised phase 3 trial

Background

The PORTEC-3 trial investigated the benefit of chemoradiotherapy versus pelvic radiotherapy alone for women with high-risk endometrial cancer. We present the preplanned long-term analysis of the randomised PORTEC-3 trial with a post-hoc analysis including molecular classification of the tumours.

Methods

PORTEC-3 was an open-label, multicentre, randomised, international phase 3 trial. Women were eligible if they had high-risk endometrial cancer (either International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 stage I, grade 3, with deep myometrial invasion and/or lymphovascular space invasion; stage II–III; or stage I–III with serous or clear-cell histology), were aged 18 years or older, and had a WHO performance score of 0–2. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive pelvic radiotherapy (48·6 Gy in 1·8 Gy fractions) or chemoradiotherapy (radiotherapy combined with two cycles of cisplatin 50 mg/m2 intravenously in weeks one and four, followed by four cycles of carboplatin area-under-the-curve 5 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 intravenously at 3-week intervals). Randomisation was done by use of biased-coin minimisation with stratification for participating centre, lymphadenectomy, stage, and histological type. We report the primary outcomes of overall survival and recurrence-free survival at 10 years. We also report primary outcomes by molecular subgroup in a post-hoc analysis. Survival was analysed in the intention-to-treat population. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00411138) and is now complete.

Findings

Between Nov 23, 2006, and Dec 20, 2013, 660 eligible and evaluable patients recruited at 103 centres in six clinical trial groups across seven countries were randomly assigned to chemoradiotherapy (n=330) or radiotherapy alone (n=330). Median follow-up was 10·1 years (IQR 9·8–11·0). Estimated 10-year overall survival was 74·4% (95% CI 69·8–79·4) in the chemoradiotherapy group and 67·3% (62·3–72·7) in the radiotherapy group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·73 [95% CI 0·54–0·97], p=0·032), and 10-year recurrence-free survival was 72·8% (67·2–77·6) versus 67·4% (61·7–72·4; adjusted HR 0·74 [95% CI 0·56–0·98], p=0·034). Molecular analysis was available for 411 (62%) patients (210 [64%] of 330 patients in the chemoradiotherapy group and 201 [61%] of 330 patients in the radiotherapy group), whose characteristics were similar to the overall trial population. Post-hoc analysis by molecular class showed that, for women with p53 abnormal tumours, 10-year overall survival was 52·7% (95% CI 40·8–68·1) with chemoradiotherapy versus 36·6% (25·0 to 53·7) with radiotherapy alone (adjusted HR 0·52 [95% CI 0·30–0·91], p=0·021); 10-year recurrence-free survival was 52·6% (95% CI 38·3 to 65·0) versus 37·0% (95% CI 23·7 to 50·2; HR 0·42 [95% CI 0·24 to 0·74], p=0·0027). MMRd and POLEmut cancers did not seem to benefit from chemoradiotherapy over radiotherapy alone, whereas the effects for NSMP cancers were modulated by oestrogen-receptor status.

Interpretation

10-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival were improved for patients with high-risk endometrial cancer treated with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone, with most clinically relevant benefit suggested for p53 abnormal cancers.

Funding

Dutch Cancer Society, Cancer Research UK, National Health and Medical Research Council Australia, Cancer Australia, Italian Medicines Agency, and the Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信