轻度智障患者创伤性与压力性生活事件后PTSD症状:证明无效。

IF 2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Mariëlle Rouleaux, Nienke Peters-Scheffer, Samantha Bouwmeester, Ramón Lindauer, Liesbeth Mevissen, Robert Didden
{"title":"轻度智障患者创伤性与压力性生活事件后PTSD症状:证明无效。","authors":"Mariëlle Rouleaux, Nienke Peters-Scheffer, Samantha Bouwmeester, Ramón Lindauer, Liesbeth Mevissen, Robert Didden","doi":"10.1111/jir.70034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research in people without ID suggests that both traumatic events (i.e., A criterion events) and stressful life events (i.e., non-A criterion events) can produce PTSD symptoms. However, research on this subject in ID populations is limited. The discussion about the usefulness of Criterion A (i.e., the stressor criterion) as a gate criterion for PTSD in the DSM-5-TR is particularly important for people with mild intellectual disabilities (MID) or borderline intellectual functioning (BIF) because of their vulnerability to stressors. This study aimed to compare PTSD symptoms and impairment of daily life functioning (IDLF) score following traumatic versus stressful index events in people with MID-BIF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Diagnostic Interview Trauma and Stressors-Intellectual Disability (DITS-ID) was administered to 54 participants with MID-BIF. Two groups were generated based on the type of index event (i.e., traumatic or stressful). Bayesian equivalence testing was used to assess whether the two groups differed in terms of PTSD symptoms and IDLF score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were more consistent with either a small difference or no difference at all between the traumatic (N = 22) and stressful group (N = 32) regarding the mean number of PTSD symptoms and the mean IDLF score. Differences in PTSD symptoms and IDLF scores ranged from 0.00 to 0.87.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No clinically relevant differences were found between the traumatic and stressful groups in terms of mean number of PTSD symptoms and IDLF score. Stressful life events might produce PTSD symptoms in people with MID-BIF.</p>","PeriodicalId":16163,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PTSD Symptoms After Traumatic Versus Stressful Life Events in People With Mild Intellectual Disabilities: Proving the Null.\",\"authors\":\"Mariëlle Rouleaux, Nienke Peters-Scheffer, Samantha Bouwmeester, Ramón Lindauer, Liesbeth Mevissen, Robert Didden\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jir.70034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research in people without ID suggests that both traumatic events (i.e., A criterion events) and stressful life events (i.e., non-A criterion events) can produce PTSD symptoms. However, research on this subject in ID populations is limited. The discussion about the usefulness of Criterion A (i.e., the stressor criterion) as a gate criterion for PTSD in the DSM-5-TR is particularly important for people with mild intellectual disabilities (MID) or borderline intellectual functioning (BIF) because of their vulnerability to stressors. This study aimed to compare PTSD symptoms and impairment of daily life functioning (IDLF) score following traumatic versus stressful index events in people with MID-BIF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Diagnostic Interview Trauma and Stressors-Intellectual Disability (DITS-ID) was administered to 54 participants with MID-BIF. Two groups were generated based on the type of index event (i.e., traumatic or stressful). Bayesian equivalence testing was used to assess whether the two groups differed in terms of PTSD symptoms and IDLF score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were more consistent with either a small difference or no difference at all between the traumatic (N = 22) and stressful group (N = 32) regarding the mean number of PTSD symptoms and the mean IDLF score. Differences in PTSD symptoms and IDLF scores ranged from 0.00 to 0.87.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No clinically relevant differences were found between the traumatic and stressful groups in terms of mean number of PTSD symptoms and IDLF score. Stressful life events might produce PTSD symptoms in people with MID-BIF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.70034\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.70034","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对无ID人群的研究表明,创伤性事件(即A标准事件)和应激性生活事件(即非A标准事件)均可产生PTSD症状。然而,关于这一问题在身份证人群中的研究是有限的。在DSM-5-TR中,关于标准A(即应激源标准)作为创伤后应激障碍的门标准的有用性的讨论,对于具有轻度智力障碍(MID)或边缘性智力功能(BIF)的人尤其重要,因为他们易受应激源的影响。本研究旨在比较中期bif患者创伤性和应激性指数事件后PTSD症状和日常生活功能障碍(IDLF)评分。方法:对54例MID-BIF患者进行创伤与应激-智力障碍诊断性访谈(dtis - id)。根据指标事件的类型(即创伤性或应激性)产生两组。采用贝叶斯等价检验评估两组在PTSD症状和IDLF评分方面是否存在差异。结果:创伤组(N = 22)和应激组(N = 32)在PTSD症状的平均数量和平均IDLF评分方面的数据比较一致,要么有很小的差异,要么根本没有差异。PTSD症状和IDLF评分的差异在0.00 ~ 0.87之间。结论:创伤组与应激组在PTSD症状的平均出现次数及IDLF评分方面无临床相关差异。有压力的生活事件可能会导致中度bif患者出现PTSD症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PTSD Symptoms After Traumatic Versus Stressful Life Events in People With Mild Intellectual Disabilities: Proving the Null.

Background: Research in people without ID suggests that both traumatic events (i.e., A criterion events) and stressful life events (i.e., non-A criterion events) can produce PTSD symptoms. However, research on this subject in ID populations is limited. The discussion about the usefulness of Criterion A (i.e., the stressor criterion) as a gate criterion for PTSD in the DSM-5-TR is particularly important for people with mild intellectual disabilities (MID) or borderline intellectual functioning (BIF) because of their vulnerability to stressors. This study aimed to compare PTSD symptoms and impairment of daily life functioning (IDLF) score following traumatic versus stressful index events in people with MID-BIF.

Methods: The Diagnostic Interview Trauma and Stressors-Intellectual Disability (DITS-ID) was administered to 54 participants with MID-BIF. Two groups were generated based on the type of index event (i.e., traumatic or stressful). Bayesian equivalence testing was used to assess whether the two groups differed in terms of PTSD symptoms and IDLF score.

Results: Data were more consistent with either a small difference or no difference at all between the traumatic (N = 22) and stressful group (N = 32) regarding the mean number of PTSD symptoms and the mean IDLF score. Differences in PTSD symptoms and IDLF scores ranged from 0.00 to 0.87.

Conclusion: No clinically relevant differences were found between the traumatic and stressful groups in terms of mean number of PTSD symptoms and IDLF score. Stressful life events might produce PTSD symptoms in people with MID-BIF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: The Journal of Intellectual Disability Research is devoted exclusively to the scientific study of intellectual disability and publishes papers reporting original observations in this field. The subject matter is broad and includes, but is not restricted to, findings from biological, educational, genetic, medical, psychiatric, psychological and sociological studies, and ethical, philosophical, and legal contributions that increase knowledge on the treatment and prevention of intellectual disability and of associated impairments and disabilities, and/or inform public policy and practice. Expert reviews on themes in which recent research has produced notable advances will be included. Such reviews will normally be by invitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信