“用他们自己的话说”:生活经验的定性探索和医疗保健专业人士对评估暴饮暴食的数字干预的看法。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Rebecca Murphy, Emma L Osborne, Nikki Newhouse, John Powell
{"title":"“用他们自己的话说”:生活经验的定性探索和医疗保健专业人士对评估暴饮暴食的数字干预的看法。","authors":"Rebecca Murphy, Emma L Osborne, Nikki Newhouse, John Powell","doi":"10.1002/eat.24539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Eating disorders characterized by binge eating are prevalent yet under-recognized, limiting access to effective care. The digital, programme-led (self-help) version of Enhanced Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT-E) offers a potentially scalable treatment. This study gathered insights from individuals with lived experience of binge eating (LE) and healthcare professionals (HCPs) to inform the design of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the intervention's effectiveness and to support early-stage implementation planning.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Four focus groups were conducted with 20 participants (8 with LE, 12 HCPs). Discussions explored recruitment strategies, participant engagement, meaningful outcome measures, and barriers to implementation. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two overarching themes were identified: (1) Reach People in Accessible and Supportive Ways, and (2) Be Open to Different Experiences of Progress. Participants emphasized inclusive recruitment and compassionate, hopeful messaging. Stigma and limited recognition of binge eating were cited as recruitment barriers in healthcare settings. Both groups recommended community and online platforms to enhance reach. Participants stressed the importance of outcomes beyond symptom reduction (e.g., emotional well-being) and qualitative methods to capture recovery narratives. Findings also highlighted implementation-relevant factors, including how interventions are framed and delivered, and how engagement can be optimized.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Perspectives from individuals with LE and HCPs support a person-centred trial aligned with the needs of those experiencing binge eating and those providing care, while considering both evaluative and implementation priorities. Findings inform strategies to enhance reach and understanding of digital intervention outcomes, contributing to trial designs that are consistent with real-world care and meaningful to participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":51067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"In Their Own Words\\\": A Qualitative Exploration of Lived Experience and Healthcare Professional Perspectives on Evaluating a Digital Intervention for Binge Eating.\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca Murphy, Emma L Osborne, Nikki Newhouse, John Powell\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eat.24539\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Eating disorders characterized by binge eating are prevalent yet under-recognized, limiting access to effective care. The digital, programme-led (self-help) version of Enhanced Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT-E) offers a potentially scalable treatment. This study gathered insights from individuals with lived experience of binge eating (LE) and healthcare professionals (HCPs) to inform the design of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the intervention's effectiveness and to support early-stage implementation planning.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Four focus groups were conducted with 20 participants (8 with LE, 12 HCPs). Discussions explored recruitment strategies, participant engagement, meaningful outcome measures, and barriers to implementation. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two overarching themes were identified: (1) Reach People in Accessible and Supportive Ways, and (2) Be Open to Different Experiences of Progress. Participants emphasized inclusive recruitment and compassionate, hopeful messaging. Stigma and limited recognition of binge eating were cited as recruitment barriers in healthcare settings. Both groups recommended community and online platforms to enhance reach. Participants stressed the importance of outcomes beyond symptom reduction (e.g., emotional well-being) and qualitative methods to capture recovery narratives. Findings also highlighted implementation-relevant factors, including how interventions are framed and delivered, and how engagement can be optimized.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Perspectives from individuals with LE and HCPs support a person-centred trial aligned with the needs of those experiencing binge eating and those providing care, while considering both evaluative and implementation priorities. Findings inform strategies to enhance reach and understanding of digital intervention outcomes, contributing to trial designs that are consistent with real-world care and meaningful to participants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Eating Disorders\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Eating Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24539\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24539","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:以暴食为特征的饮食失调很普遍,但未得到充分认识,限制了获得有效治疗的机会。强化认知行为疗法(CBT-E)的数字化、项目主导(自助)版本提供了一种潜在的可扩展治疗。本研究收集了有暴食(LE)生活经历的个体和医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)的见解,为随机对照试验的设计提供信息,以评估干预措施的有效性,并支持早期实施计划。方法:分为4个焦点组,共20人,其中LE组8人,HCPs组12人。讨论探讨了招聘策略、参与者参与、有意义的结果测量和实施障碍。数据采用专题分析进行分析。结果:确定了两个总体主题:(1)以可访问和支持的方式接触人们;(2)对不同的进步经验持开放态度。与会者强调包容性招聘和富有同情心、充满希望的信息。耻辱感和对暴饮暴食的有限认识被认为是医疗保健机构招聘人员的障碍。这两个小组都推荐社区和在线平台来扩大覆盖面。与会者强调了除症状减轻(如情绪健康)和定性方法之外的结果的重要性,以捕捉康复叙述。调查结果还强调了与实施相关的因素,包括如何制定和提供干预措施,以及如何优化参与。讨论:LE和HCPs患者的观点支持以人为中心的试验,与暴饮暴食者和提供护理者的需求保持一致,同时考虑评估和实施的优先事项。研究结果为加强数字干预结果的覆盖范围和理解的策略提供信息,有助于试验设计与现实世界的护理一致,并对参与者有意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"In Their Own Words": A Qualitative Exploration of Lived Experience and Healthcare Professional Perspectives on Evaluating a Digital Intervention for Binge Eating.

Objective: Eating disorders characterized by binge eating are prevalent yet under-recognized, limiting access to effective care. The digital, programme-led (self-help) version of Enhanced Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT-E) offers a potentially scalable treatment. This study gathered insights from individuals with lived experience of binge eating (LE) and healthcare professionals (HCPs) to inform the design of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the intervention's effectiveness and to support early-stage implementation planning.

Method: Four focus groups were conducted with 20 participants (8 with LE, 12 HCPs). Discussions explored recruitment strategies, participant engagement, meaningful outcome measures, and barriers to implementation. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results: Two overarching themes were identified: (1) Reach People in Accessible and Supportive Ways, and (2) Be Open to Different Experiences of Progress. Participants emphasized inclusive recruitment and compassionate, hopeful messaging. Stigma and limited recognition of binge eating were cited as recruitment barriers in healthcare settings. Both groups recommended community and online platforms to enhance reach. Participants stressed the importance of outcomes beyond symptom reduction (e.g., emotional well-being) and qualitative methods to capture recovery narratives. Findings also highlighted implementation-relevant factors, including how interventions are framed and delivered, and how engagement can be optimized.

Discussion: Perspectives from individuals with LE and HCPs support a person-centred trial aligned with the needs of those experiencing binge eating and those providing care, while considering both evaluative and implementation priorities. Findings inform strategies to enhance reach and understanding of digital intervention outcomes, contributing to trial designs that are consistent with real-world care and meaningful to participants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.70%
发文量
204
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Articles featured in the journal describe state-of-the-art scientific research on theory, methodology, etiology, clinical practice, and policy related to eating disorders, as well as contributions that facilitate scholarly critique and discussion of science and practice in the field. Theoretical and empirical work on obesity or healthy eating falls within the journal’s scope inasmuch as it facilitates the advancement of efforts to describe and understand, prevent, or treat eating disorders. IJED welcomes submissions from all regions of the world and representing all levels of inquiry (including basic science, clinical trials, implementation research, and dissemination studies), and across a full range of scientific methods, disciplines, and approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信