Daudi van Veen, Jojanneke van der Toorn, Nour S Kteily
{"title":"我们的殖民后遗症?公然的非人性化在支持有争议的文化传统方面发挥了作用。","authors":"Daudi van Veen, Jojanneke van der Toorn, Nour S Kteily","doi":"10.1037/cdp0000769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Ethnic miming, or impersonating stereotypical caricatures of marginalized groups, remains popular despite years of protests. Previous studies highlight that individual differences in ideological orientations predicting a range of intergroup attitudes-namely, social dominance orientation (SDO) and right-wing authoritarianism (RWA)-also predict support for ethnic miming. We propose that blatant dehumanization of the target groups is an underlying mechanism that helps to further explain why support for ethnic miming is stronger among individuals higher in SDO and RWA. Studies from the Netherlands (Study 1) and the United States (Study 2) provide support for this notion.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The samples consisted of participants residing in the Netherlands (<i>N</i> = 142; Study 1) and the United States (<i>N</i> = 298; Study 2), the majority of whom identified as part of the dominant ethnic group (82% ethnically Dutch, Study 1; 76% White American, Study 2). We used both mediation and cluster analyses to test our hypotheses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mediation analyses reveal indirect effects from each of SDO and RWA to support for ethnic miming via blatant dehumanization. Additionally, the cluster analyses reveal that although some individuals who support ethnic miming have relatively egalitarian attitudes, others have attitudes that arguably reflect a sense of cultural superiority and preference for cultural dominance (i.e., high SDO, RWA, and blatant dehumanization).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that a sense of cultural superiority and preference for cultural dominance helps to explain why support for ethnic miming persists in both cultural contexts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48151,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Our colonial hangover? Blatant dehumanization plays a role in support for contested cultural traditions.\",\"authors\":\"Daudi van Veen, Jojanneke van der Toorn, Nour S Kteily\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/cdp0000769\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Ethnic miming, or impersonating stereotypical caricatures of marginalized groups, remains popular despite years of protests. Previous studies highlight that individual differences in ideological orientations predicting a range of intergroup attitudes-namely, social dominance orientation (SDO) and right-wing authoritarianism (RWA)-also predict support for ethnic miming. We propose that blatant dehumanization of the target groups is an underlying mechanism that helps to further explain why support for ethnic miming is stronger among individuals higher in SDO and RWA. Studies from the Netherlands (Study 1) and the United States (Study 2) provide support for this notion.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The samples consisted of participants residing in the Netherlands (<i>N</i> = 142; Study 1) and the United States (<i>N</i> = 298; Study 2), the majority of whom identified as part of the dominant ethnic group (82% ethnically Dutch, Study 1; 76% White American, Study 2). We used both mediation and cluster analyses to test our hypotheses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mediation analyses reveal indirect effects from each of SDO and RWA to support for ethnic miming via blatant dehumanization. Additionally, the cluster analyses reveal that although some individuals who support ethnic miming have relatively egalitarian attitudes, others have attitudes that arguably reflect a sense of cultural superiority and preference for cultural dominance (i.e., high SDO, RWA, and blatant dehumanization).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that a sense of cultural superiority and preference for cultural dominance helps to explain why support for ethnic miming persists in both cultural contexts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48151,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000769\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHNIC STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000769","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:尽管多年的抗议,种族模仿,或模仿边缘化群体的刻板漫画,仍然很流行。先前的研究强调,意识形态取向的个体差异预测了一系列群体间的态度——即社会支配取向(SDO)和右翼威权主义(RWA)——也预测了对种族模仿的支持。我们认为目标群体的明显非人性化是一个潜在的机制,有助于进一步解释为什么在SDO和RWA较高的个体中对种族模仿的支持更强。来自荷兰(研究1)和美国(研究2)的研究支持了这一观点。方法:样本由居住在荷兰(N = 142;研究1)和美国(N = 298;研究2)的参与者组成,其中大多数人被确定为主要种族群体的一部分(82%的荷兰人,研究1;76%的美国白人,研究2)。我们使用中介和聚类分析来检验我们的假设。结果:中介分析揭示了SDO和RWA各自对支持公然非人性化种族模仿的间接影响。此外,聚类分析显示,尽管一些支持种族模仿的个体具有相对平等主义的态度,但其他人的态度可能反映了一种文化优越感和对文化主导地位的偏好(即,高SDO、RWA和明显的非人性化)。结论:研究结果表明,文化优越感和对文化优势的偏好有助于解释为什么在两种文化背景下都支持种族模仿。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
Our colonial hangover? Blatant dehumanization plays a role in support for contested cultural traditions.
Objectives: Ethnic miming, or impersonating stereotypical caricatures of marginalized groups, remains popular despite years of protests. Previous studies highlight that individual differences in ideological orientations predicting a range of intergroup attitudes-namely, social dominance orientation (SDO) and right-wing authoritarianism (RWA)-also predict support for ethnic miming. We propose that blatant dehumanization of the target groups is an underlying mechanism that helps to further explain why support for ethnic miming is stronger among individuals higher in SDO and RWA. Studies from the Netherlands (Study 1) and the United States (Study 2) provide support for this notion.
Method: The samples consisted of participants residing in the Netherlands (N = 142; Study 1) and the United States (N = 298; Study 2), the majority of whom identified as part of the dominant ethnic group (82% ethnically Dutch, Study 1; 76% White American, Study 2). We used both mediation and cluster analyses to test our hypotheses.
Results: The mediation analyses reveal indirect effects from each of SDO and RWA to support for ethnic miming via blatant dehumanization. Additionally, the cluster analyses reveal that although some individuals who support ethnic miming have relatively egalitarian attitudes, others have attitudes that arguably reflect a sense of cultural superiority and preference for cultural dominance (i.e., high SDO, RWA, and blatant dehumanization).
Conclusion: The findings suggest that a sense of cultural superiority and preference for cultural dominance helps to explain why support for ethnic miming persists in both cultural contexts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology seeks to publish theoretical, conceptual, research, and case study articles that promote the development of knowledge and understanding, application of psychological principles, and scholarly analysis of social–political forces affecting racial and ethnic minorities.