拆除专业心理学中的障碍:支持以前参与司法的学生和学员。

IF 1.4 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Ryan E Flinn, Terrill O Taylor, Bradley D Custer, Grant Tietjen, Christopher R Beasley, Cory J Cascalheira, Tracie L Hitter, Kristen M Abraham, Patrick F Hibbard, Mohamed Elnakib, Eric B Mendoza, Violeta B Jaure, Lisa De La Rue, Kevon-Mark P Jackman, Kimberly Fuentes, Carlos C Mahaffey, Bryce Redd, Ian W Holloway, Raiza M Beltran, Erin E Bonar, Melanie M Wilcox, Lara M Stepleman
{"title":"拆除专业心理学中的障碍:支持以前参与司法的学生和学员。","authors":"Ryan E Flinn, Terrill O Taylor, Bradley D Custer, Grant Tietjen, Christopher R Beasley, Cory J Cascalheira, Tracie L Hitter, Kristen M Abraham, Patrick F Hibbard, Mohamed Elnakib, Eric B Mendoza, Violeta B Jaure, Lisa De La Rue, Kevon-Mark P Jackman, Kimberly Fuentes, Carlos C Mahaffey, Bryce Redd, Ian W Holloway, Raiza M Beltran, Erin E Bonar, Melanie M Wilcox, Lara M Stepleman","doi":"10.1037/tep0000515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the United States, approximately 1.9 million adults are incarcerated, 5.5 million individuals are under some form of correctional supervision, and nearly 80 million people live with the collateral consequences of having a legal record. Given the continued popularity of psychology as an undergraduate major, it is conceivable that formerly justice-involved people are and will continue to be our students, trainees, and colleagues. Meanwhile, colleges, universities, academic disciplines, and professional organizations are increasingly engaging in discussions around inclusion of people with lived experience, and in 2022 the American Psychological Association took a concrete step to foster more inclusion for formerly justice-involved psychologists by removing the felony history question on its membership application. However, to our knowledge, there are no resources that explicitly detail the experiences of formerly justice-involved people in professional psychology. This paper - written by formerly justice-involved psychologists and our allies - detail our own experiences in health service psychology training programs. By sharing these experiences, we identify discriminatory policies that restrict access, impede advancement, and create unique and hidden difficulties for justice-impacted people in health service psychology. We also describe strategies to improve practices in training programs and offer suggestions to psychology leaders invested in fostering inclusion and belonging for formerly justice-involved people.</p>","PeriodicalId":47035,"journal":{"name":"Training and Education in Professional Psychology","volume":"19 3","pages":"245-252"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12382604/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dismantling Barriers in Professional Psychology: Supporting Formerly Justice-Involved Students and Trainees.\",\"authors\":\"Ryan E Flinn, Terrill O Taylor, Bradley D Custer, Grant Tietjen, Christopher R Beasley, Cory J Cascalheira, Tracie L Hitter, Kristen M Abraham, Patrick F Hibbard, Mohamed Elnakib, Eric B Mendoza, Violeta B Jaure, Lisa De La Rue, Kevon-Mark P Jackman, Kimberly Fuentes, Carlos C Mahaffey, Bryce Redd, Ian W Holloway, Raiza M Beltran, Erin E Bonar, Melanie M Wilcox, Lara M Stepleman\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/tep0000515\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In the United States, approximately 1.9 million adults are incarcerated, 5.5 million individuals are under some form of correctional supervision, and nearly 80 million people live with the collateral consequences of having a legal record. Given the continued popularity of psychology as an undergraduate major, it is conceivable that formerly justice-involved people are and will continue to be our students, trainees, and colleagues. Meanwhile, colleges, universities, academic disciplines, and professional organizations are increasingly engaging in discussions around inclusion of people with lived experience, and in 2022 the American Psychological Association took a concrete step to foster more inclusion for formerly justice-involved psychologists by removing the felony history question on its membership application. However, to our knowledge, there are no resources that explicitly detail the experiences of formerly justice-involved people in professional psychology. This paper - written by formerly justice-involved psychologists and our allies - detail our own experiences in health service psychology training programs. By sharing these experiences, we identify discriminatory policies that restrict access, impede advancement, and create unique and hidden difficulties for justice-impacted people in health service psychology. We also describe strategies to improve practices in training programs and offer suggestions to psychology leaders invested in fostering inclusion and belonging for formerly justice-involved people.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Training and Education in Professional Psychology\",\"volume\":\"19 3\",\"pages\":\"245-252\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12382604/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Training and Education in Professional Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000515\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Training and Education in Professional Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000515","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在美国,大约有190万成年人被监禁,550万人受到某种形式的惩教监督,近8000万人生活在有法律记录的附带后果中。鉴于心理学作为一门本科专业的持续流行,可以想象,以前与司法有关的人现在和将来都是我们的学生、实习生和同事。与此同时,学院、大学、学术学科和专业组织越来越多地参与到关于包容有生活经验的人的讨论中来。2022年,美国心理协会采取了具体措施,通过取消会员申请中的重罪历史问题,促进了对曾经参与司法的心理学家的包容。然而,据我们所知,在专业心理学中,没有任何资源可以明确地详细描述以前与正义有关的人的经历。本文由前司法心理学家和我们的盟友撰写,详细介绍了我们自己在卫生服务心理学培训项目中的经验。通过分享这些经验,我们确定了歧视性政策,这些政策限制了获取机会,阻碍了进步,并为卫生服务心理学中受司法影响的人创造了独特和隐藏的困难。我们还描述了改进培训项目实践的策略,并为心理学领导者提供了建议,这些心理学领导者致力于培养以前参与司法的人的包容性和归属感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dismantling Barriers in Professional Psychology: Supporting Formerly Justice-Involved Students and Trainees.

In the United States, approximately 1.9 million adults are incarcerated, 5.5 million individuals are under some form of correctional supervision, and nearly 80 million people live with the collateral consequences of having a legal record. Given the continued popularity of psychology as an undergraduate major, it is conceivable that formerly justice-involved people are and will continue to be our students, trainees, and colleagues. Meanwhile, colleges, universities, academic disciplines, and professional organizations are increasingly engaging in discussions around inclusion of people with lived experience, and in 2022 the American Psychological Association took a concrete step to foster more inclusion for formerly justice-involved psychologists by removing the felony history question on its membership application. However, to our knowledge, there are no resources that explicitly detail the experiences of formerly justice-involved people in professional psychology. This paper - written by formerly justice-involved psychologists and our allies - detail our own experiences in health service psychology training programs. By sharing these experiences, we identify discriminatory policies that restrict access, impede advancement, and create unique and hidden difficulties for justice-impacted people in health service psychology. We also describe strategies to improve practices in training programs and offer suggestions to psychology leaders invested in fostering inclusion and belonging for formerly justice-involved people.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: The Association of Postdoctoral and Internship Centers and the American Psychological Association have joined together to publish Training and Education in Professional Psychology, which serves as the primary source for gathering the most important information that contributes to and advances professional psychology education and training. The journal is written for psychologists and other mental health professionals who educate, supervise, and train mental health practitioners during their academic programs as well as during their participation at practicum, internship, and postdoctoral settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信