Moises David Reyes-Perez, Leticia Carreño Saucedo, María Julia Sanchez-Levano, Roxana Cabanillas-Palomino, Paola Fiorella Monje-Yovera, Johan Pablo Jaime-Rodríguez, Luz Angelica Atoche-Silva, Johannes Michael Alarcón-Bustíos, Antony Esmit Franco Fernández-Altamirano
{"title":"精神-弹性-幸福三位一体:一个理解大学生幸福感的强大模型。","authors":"Moises David Reyes-Perez, Leticia Carreño Saucedo, María Julia Sanchez-Levano, Roxana Cabanillas-Palomino, Paola Fiorella Monje-Yovera, Johan Pablo Jaime-Rodríguez, Luz Angelica Atoche-Silva, Johannes Michael Alarcón-Bustíos, Antony Esmit Franco Fernández-Altamirano","doi":"10.3390/ejihpe15080158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examines the relationships between spirituality, resilience, and happiness among higher education students, exploring the moderating roles of religious belief and years of study based on developmental and religious coping theoretical frameworks. Developmental theory suggests that university students' psychological resources evolve across academic years, while religious coping theory posits that individual differences in religious commitment may buffer spirituality's protective effects on well-being outcomes. Using a quantitative cross-sectional approach, data were collected from 459 university students from environmental science programs across public and private universities in northern Peru. Participants were predominantly female (59.04%) and aged 18-24 years (73%). Three validated instruments were administered: the Personal Spirituality Scale, Connor-Davidson Brief Resilience Scale, and Subjective Happiness Scale. Religious beliefs were measured on a 5-point scale, while years of study was categorized by academic year. Results from partial least squares structural equation modeling revealed significant direct effects of spirituality on both happiness (β = 0.256, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and resilience (β = 0.274, <i>p</i> < 0.001), with resilience also significantly influencing happiness (β = 0.162, <i>p</i> < 0.05). The structural model demonstrated exceptional explanatory power, with spirituality explaining 97.1% of variance in resilience, while spirituality and resilience together accounted for 86.2% of variance in happiness. Contrary to theoretical expectations, neither religious beliefs (β = 0.032, <i>p</i> = 0.489) nor years of study (β = -0.047, <i>p</i> = 0.443) showed significant moderating effects. These results suggest that spirituality and resilience serve as universal contributors to student well-being, operating independently of specific religious orientations and academic progression. The findings support integrating spiritual development and resilience-building components into inclusive university student support programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":30631,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education","volume":"15 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12385709/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Spirituality-Resilience-Happiness Triad: A High-Powered Model for Understanding University Student Well-Being.\",\"authors\":\"Moises David Reyes-Perez, Leticia Carreño Saucedo, María Julia Sanchez-Levano, Roxana Cabanillas-Palomino, Paola Fiorella Monje-Yovera, Johan Pablo Jaime-Rodríguez, Luz Angelica Atoche-Silva, Johannes Michael Alarcón-Bustíos, Antony Esmit Franco Fernández-Altamirano\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/ejihpe15080158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study examines the relationships between spirituality, resilience, and happiness among higher education students, exploring the moderating roles of religious belief and years of study based on developmental and religious coping theoretical frameworks. Developmental theory suggests that university students' psychological resources evolve across academic years, while religious coping theory posits that individual differences in religious commitment may buffer spirituality's protective effects on well-being outcomes. Using a quantitative cross-sectional approach, data were collected from 459 university students from environmental science programs across public and private universities in northern Peru. Participants were predominantly female (59.04%) and aged 18-24 years (73%). Three validated instruments were administered: the Personal Spirituality Scale, Connor-Davidson Brief Resilience Scale, and Subjective Happiness Scale. Religious beliefs were measured on a 5-point scale, while years of study was categorized by academic year. Results from partial least squares structural equation modeling revealed significant direct effects of spirituality on both happiness (β = 0.256, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and resilience (β = 0.274, <i>p</i> < 0.001), with resilience also significantly influencing happiness (β = 0.162, <i>p</i> < 0.05). The structural model demonstrated exceptional explanatory power, with spirituality explaining 97.1% of variance in resilience, while spirituality and resilience together accounted for 86.2% of variance in happiness. Contrary to theoretical expectations, neither religious beliefs (β = 0.032, <i>p</i> = 0.489) nor years of study (β = -0.047, <i>p</i> = 0.443) showed significant moderating effects. These results suggest that spirituality and resilience serve as universal contributors to student well-being, operating independently of specific religious orientations and academic progression. The findings support integrating spiritual development and resilience-building components into inclusive university student support programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":30631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education\",\"volume\":\"15 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12385709/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe15080158\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe15080158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究在发展与宗教应对理论框架的基础上,探讨了高等教育学生的灵性、弹性和幸福感之间的关系,并探讨了宗教信仰和学习年限的调节作用。发展理论认为,大学生的心理资源在整个学年中不断发展,而宗教应对理论认为,宗教承诺的个体差异可能会缓冲灵性对幸福感结果的保护作用。采用定量横断面方法,从秘鲁北部公立和私立大学环境科学专业的459名大学生中收集了数据。参与者主要是女性(59.04%),年龄在18-24岁(73%)。采用三种有效的量表:个人灵性量表、康纳-戴维森简短弹性量表和主观幸福感量表。宗教信仰以5分制来衡量,而学习年限则按学年分类。偏最小二乘结构方程模型结果显示,灵性对幸福感(β = 0.256, p < 0.001)和心理弹性(β = 0.274, p < 0.001)均有显著的直接影响,心理弹性对幸福感也有显著的影响(β = 0.162, p < 0.05)。结构模型显示出卓越的解释力,灵性解释了97.1%的弹性方差,而灵性和弹性共同解释了86.2%的幸福方差。与理论预期相反,无论是宗教信仰(β = 0.032, p = 0.489)还是学习年限(β = -0.047, p = 0.443)都没有显示出显著的调节作用。这些结果表明,灵性和弹性是学生幸福的普遍贡献者,独立于特定的宗教取向和学业进步。研究结果支持将精神发展和复原力建设组成部分纳入包容性大学学生支持计划。
The Spirituality-Resilience-Happiness Triad: A High-Powered Model for Understanding University Student Well-Being.
This study examines the relationships between spirituality, resilience, and happiness among higher education students, exploring the moderating roles of religious belief and years of study based on developmental and religious coping theoretical frameworks. Developmental theory suggests that university students' psychological resources evolve across academic years, while religious coping theory posits that individual differences in religious commitment may buffer spirituality's protective effects on well-being outcomes. Using a quantitative cross-sectional approach, data were collected from 459 university students from environmental science programs across public and private universities in northern Peru. Participants were predominantly female (59.04%) and aged 18-24 years (73%). Three validated instruments were administered: the Personal Spirituality Scale, Connor-Davidson Brief Resilience Scale, and Subjective Happiness Scale. Religious beliefs were measured on a 5-point scale, while years of study was categorized by academic year. Results from partial least squares structural equation modeling revealed significant direct effects of spirituality on both happiness (β = 0.256, p < 0.001) and resilience (β = 0.274, p < 0.001), with resilience also significantly influencing happiness (β = 0.162, p < 0.05). The structural model demonstrated exceptional explanatory power, with spirituality explaining 97.1% of variance in resilience, while spirituality and resilience together accounted for 86.2% of variance in happiness. Contrary to theoretical expectations, neither religious beliefs (β = 0.032, p = 0.489) nor years of study (β = -0.047, p = 0.443) showed significant moderating effects. These results suggest that spirituality and resilience serve as universal contributors to student well-being, operating independently of specific religious orientations and academic progression. The findings support integrating spiritual development and resilience-building components into inclusive university student support programs.